Exploring the impact of a co-designed shared book reading environment for families in a community hub.

Publisher: Wiley Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9803709 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1460-6984 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13682822 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Lang Commun Disord Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: 2011- : Malden, MA : Wiley
Original Publication: London : Taylor & Francis for the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, c1998-

Reading* ; Books*; Humans ; Female ; Male ; Child ; Literacy ; Child, Preschool ; Social Environment ; Family/psychology

Background: Evidence supports the effectiveness of shared book reading for promoting language and literacy development, but it is known that families experiencing vulnerability may have reduced access to books and are less likely to share books regularly at home. Community hubs often provide support to families experiencing vulnerability and may provide an opportunity to create environments that support families to engage in shared book reading, especially if families are invited into the creation of these environments through co-design. However, there is currently little evidence regarding the impact of co-designing shared book reading environments with families in community settings.
Aims: The current study is part of a broader project which used co-design to develop a shared book reading environment in collaboration with stakeholders in a community hub. This small-scale study aimed to provide a preliminary evaluation of the impact of this co-designed shared book reading environment at the community hub on (1) the frequency of shared book reading at the hub; (2) participants' confidence and enjoyment of reading with children at the hub; and (3) participants' experiences of shared book reading at the hub.
Method & Procedures: The co-design project was carried out in four phases with families, staff and community partners at the community hub. A convergent mixed-methods approach was used to collect and analyse quantitative and qualitative data in the first and last phase of the project to evaluate project outcomes. Quantitative data (environmental observations of reading at the hub and participant ratings of confidence and enjoyment of reading with children at the hub) were analysed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric statistical tests. Qualitative data (participants' responses regarding their experiences of changes implemented in the community hub) were analysed using inductive content analysis.
Outcome & Results: An increased frequency of shared book reading was observed within the community hub after changes were implemented, and positive changes in enjoyment of book reading were recorded. Qualitative responses from participants following conclusion of the project were organised into three main categories, which showed that (1) children and families were reading more and enjoying reading activities that were happening; (2) children and families were borrowing more books; and (3) families had changed the way they were reading at home with their children.
Conclusions & Implications: A co-designed shared book reading environment within a community hub had a positive impact on shared book reading experiences for families in areas with high levels of vulnerability.
What This Paper Adds: What is already known on this subject Community hubs provide a unique opportunity to support early language and literacy development in partnership with families in areas of vulnerability; however, there is limited literature investigating the impacts of these supports. A previous study utilised co-design to develop a shared book reading environment with stakeholders at a community hub in an area where a high proportion of children are considered to be 'vulnerable' in terms of language and literacy development. It was found that co-design enabled the development of collaborative changes to support shared book reading that were valued and owned by families, staff and community partners at the community hub. What this study adds The current study focused on evaluating the impact of a co-design project on the frequency of shared book reading at the hub and participants' experiences, confidence and enjoyment of reading with children at the hub. Analysis of pre- and post-data provide preliminary evidence that a co-designed shared book reading environment in a community hub can have a positive impact on increasing families' awareness and engagement with book borrowing, engagement in shared book reading activities in the community and at home, and participants' confidence and enjoyment of reading with children. What are the clinical implications of this work? Speech pathologists have an important role to play in prevention and promotion. This study has shown that collaboration with families experiencing vulnerability can support the implementation of strategies to promote shared reading in a community hub and demonstrate increased quality and frequency of shared book reading. The utilisation of a community hub also highlights the opportunities for the speech pathology profession to deliver community-based promotion and prevention initiatives as a strategy to address equitable language outcomes.
(© 2024 Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists.)

Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS]. (2017) 2016 Census QuickStats. Retrieved from https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/.
Barratt‐Pugh, C. & Allen, N. (2011) Making a difference: findings from Better Beginnings a family literacy intervention programme. The Australian Library Journal, 60(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2011.10722616.
Blewitt, P., Rump, K.M., Shealy, S.E. & Cook, S.A. (2009) Shared book reading: when and how questions affect young children's word learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013844.
Boyce, L.K., Innocenti, M.S., Roggman, L.A., Norman, V.K.J. & Ortiz, E. (2010) Telling stories and making books: evidence for an intervention to help parents in migrant Head Start families support their children's language and literacy. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 343–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409281003631142.
Bryman, A. (2006) Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
Campana, K., Mills, J.E., Kociubuk, J. & Martin, M.H. (2022) Access, advocacy, and impact: how public libraries are contributing to educational equity for children and families in underserved communities. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(4), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2021.2017375.
Canfield, C.F., Seery, A., Weisleder, A., Workman, C., Brockmeyer Cates, C., Roby, E., Payne, R., Levine, S., Mogilner, L., Dreyer, B. & Mendelsohn, A. (2020) Encouraging parent‐child book sharing: potential additive benefits of literacy in health care and the community. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.002.
Chen, P., Rea, C., Shaw, R. & Bottino, C.J. (2016) Associations between public library use and reading along among families with young children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 173, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.016.
Chow, J.C. & Wehby, J.H. (2018) Associations between language and problem behavior: a systematic review and correlational meta‐analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648‐016‐9385‐z.
Clemens, L.F. & Kegel, C.A.T. (2021) Unique contribution of shared book reading on adult‐child language interaction. Journal of Child Language, 48(2), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000331.
Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008) Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Darcy‐Mahoney, A., McConnell, S.R., Larson, A.L., Becklenberg, A. & Stapel‐Wax, J.L. (2019) Where do we go from here? Examining pediatric and population‐level interventions to improve child outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 50, 205–220.
Demir‐Lira, Ö.E., Applebaum, L.R., Goldin‐Meadow, S. & Levine, S.C. (2019) Parents’ early book reading to children: relation to children's later language and literacy outcomes controlling for other parent language input. Developmental Science, 22(3), e12764. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12764.
Di Sante, M. & Potvin, L. (2022) We need to talk about social inequalities in language development. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology, 31(4), 1894–1897. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP‐21‐00326.
Dockrell, J.E., Forrest, C.L., Law, J., Mathers, S. & Charlton, J. (2022) Screening for language difficulties in disadvantaged populations on entry to early years education: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.833603.
Dowdall, N., Melendez‐Torres, G.J., Murray, L., Gardner, F., Hartford, L. & Cooper, P.J. (2020) Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Child Development, 91(2), e383–e399. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13225.
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008) The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2648.2007.04569.x.
Goldfeld, S., O'Connor, M., Chong, S., Gray, S., O'Connor, E., Woolfenden, S., Redmond, G., Williams, K., Mensah, F., Kvalsvig, A. & Badland, H. (2018) The impact of multidimensional disadvantage over childhood on developmental outcomes in Australia. International Journal of Epidemiology, 47(5), 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy087.
Graneheim, U.H. & Lundman, B. (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
Hall, T., Goldfeld, S., Loftus, H., Honisett, S., Liu, H., De Souza, D., Bailey, C., Reupert, A., Yap, M.B.H., Eapen, V., Haslam, R., Sanci, L., Fisher, J., Eastwood, J., Mukumbang, F.C., Loveday, S., Jones, R., Constable, L., Forell, S., … Hiscock, H. (2022) Integrated Child and Family Hub models for detecting and responding to family adversity: protocol for a mixed‐methods evaluation in two sites. BMJ Open, 12(5), e055431–e055431. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen‐2021‐055431.
Honisett, S., Hall, T., Hiscock, H. & Goldfeld, S. (2022) The feasibility of a child and family hub within Victorian community health services: a qualitative study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 46 (6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753‐6405.13292.
Jacob, R.S., John, S., Bellon‐Harn, M.L. & Manchaiah, V. (2023) Exploring maternal interactions during shared book readings in Indian home contexts. Early Childhood Education Journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643‐023‐01487‐7.
Joshua, P., Zwi, K., Moran, P. & White, L. (2015) Prioritising vulnerable children: why should we address inequity? Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(6), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12264.
Klieve, H.M. & Flückiger, B. (2015) Towards an evidence base: exploring the impact of community‐based literacy programs in remote indigenous communities. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 40(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911504000211.
Law, J., Rush, R., Schoon, I. & Parsons, S. (2009) Modeling developmental language difficulties from school entry into adulthood: literacy, mental health, and employment outcomes. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 52(6), 1401–1416. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092‐4388(2009/08‐0142).
Manz, P.H., Hughes, C., Barnabas, E., Bracaliello, C. & Ginsburg‐Block, M. (2010) A descriptive review and meta‐analysis of family‐based emergent literacy interventions: to what extent is the research applicable to low‐income, ethnic‐minority or linguistically‐diverse young children? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(4), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.03.002.
McKean, C. & Reilly, S. (2023) Creating the conditions for robust early language development for all: part two: evidence informed public health framework for child language in the early years. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460‐6984.12927.
Montag, J.L., Jones, M.N. & Smith, L.B. (2015) The words children hear: picture books and the statistics for language learning. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594361.
Neuman, S.B. & Celano, D.C. (2012) Giving our children a fighting chance: Poverty, literacy, and the development of information capital. New York: Teachers College Press.
OʻFarrelly, C., Doyle, O., Victory, G. & Palamaro‐Munsell, E. (2018) Shared reading in infancy and later development: evidence from an early intervention. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 54, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.12.001.
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh‐Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R.M. (2017) Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3, 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev‐linguistics‐011516‐034226.
Preece, J. & Levy, R. (2020) Understanding the barriers and motivations to shared reading with young children: the role of enjoyment and feedback. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(4), 631–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798418779216.
Rezzonico, S., Hipfner‐Coucher, K., Milburn, T., Weitzman, E., Greenberg, J., Pelletier, J. & Girolametto, L. (2015) Improving preschool educators’ interactive shared book reading: effects of coaching in professional development. American Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology, 24, 717–732.
Sanders, E.B.N. & Stappers, P.J. (2014) Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183.
Schwab, J.F. & Lew‐Williams, C. (2016) Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child‐directed speech. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7(4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1393.
Smith, R. & Gallego, G. (2021) Parents’ ability to access community health occupational therapy services in a disadvantaged area: a proof of concept study. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 68(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440‐1630.12699.
Smith, H., Dunstan, K., Melvin, K., Armstrong, R., Frazer‐Ryan, S. & Scarinci, N. (2023) Co‐designing a shared book reading environment at a community hub. International Journal of Speech‐Language Pathology, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2023.2182742.
Thabrew, H., Fleming, T., Hetrick, S. & Merry, S. (2018) Codesign of eHealth interventions with children and young people. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 481–481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00481.
Zauche, L.H., Thul, T.A., Mahoney, A.E.D. & Stapel‐Wax, J.L. (2016) Influence of language nutrition on children's language and cognitive development: an integrated review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.015.

Speech Pathology Australia Queensland Registration Board Legacy Grant.

Keywords: community hub; co‐design; disadvantaged families; shared book reading

Date Created: 20240108 Date Completed: 20240717 Latest Revision: 20240717

20240717

10.1111/1460-6984.13002

38189112