The Role of Receptive/Orthographic Vocabulary, Productive/Orthographic Vocabulary, Productive/Phonological Vocabulary and Depth of Vocabulary in Predicting Reading-to-Write Performance.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Pan R;Pan R
  • Source:
    Journal of psycholinguistic research [J Psycholinguist Res] 2023 Dec; Vol. 52 (6), pp. 3039-3062. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 20.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0333506 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-6555 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00906905 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Psycholinguist Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Sept. 2004- : New York : Springer
      Original Publication: New York, Plenum Press
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Vocabulary knowledge greatly affects writing performance (Stæhr in Lang Learn J 36:139-152, 2008; Johnson in Tesol J 7:700-715 2016), but little is known about the relative contribution of different dimensions of vocabulary knowledge to reading-to-write performance. The current study attempted to investigates the contribution of receptive/orthographic (RecOrth) vocabulary knowledge, productive/orthographic knowledge (ProOrth), productive/phonological (ProPhon) vocabulary knowledge and depth of vocabulary knowledge to reading-to-write scores. For this purpose, 154 Chinese English as foreign language (EFL) learners took a battery of vocabulary knowledge tests and a reading-to-write test. The extent to which vocabulary at different word frequencies predicted reading-to-write was also investigated. The results of regression indicated that ProOrth academic level, vocabulary depth, and RecOrth 2, 000 frequency level explained 40.2% of the reading-to-write score variance. Among the high-performing group, ProOrth academic and vocabulary depth were predictive of the reading-to-write score, while only ProOrth academic vocabulary explained the variance in the reading-to-write score for the low-performing group. The findings reveal the important relationship among dimensions of vocabulary knowledge and reading-to-write and stress the need for systematic vocabulary instruction.
      (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
    • References:
      Akbarian, I. (2010). The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for ESP/EAP learners. System, 38(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.06.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.system.2010.06.013)
      Akbarian, I., & Farrokhi, J. (2020). Lexical availability and writing ability of EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJAL.12319. (PMID: 10.1111/IJAL.12319)
      Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.05.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jslw.2009.05.003)
      Chen, X. (2009). The validation study of the objective items in TEM4. Fudan University Press.
      Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851. (PMID: 10.1177/0265532216676851)
      Cobb, T. Compleat Web VP v.2.6 [computer program]. Accessed 5 March 2022 at https://www.lextutor.ca/vp/comp/.
      Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951. (PMID: 10.2307/3587951)
      Coxhead, A. (2012). Academic vocabulary, writing and English for academic purposes: Perspectives from second language learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439323. (PMID: 10.1177/0033688212439323)
      Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOFEL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001)
      Dabbagh, A., & Janebi Enayat, M. (2017). The role of vocabulary breadth and depth in predicting second language descriptive writing performance. Language Learning Journal, 47(5), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1335765. (PMID: 10.1080/09571736.2017.1335765)
      Daller, H., Milton, J., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2007). Editors’ introduction: Conventions, terminology and an overview of the book. In H. Daller, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press. (PMID: 10.1017/CBO9780511667268)
      Goodwin, A. P., August, D., & Calderon, M. (2015). Reading in multiple orthographies: Differences and similarities in reading in Spanish and English for English learners. Language Learning, 65(3), 596–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12127. (PMID: 10.1111/lang.12127)
      González-fernández, B., & Schmitt.N. (2020). Word knowledge: Exploring the relationships and order of acquisition of vocabulary knowledge components, Applied Linguistics, 41(4),481–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy057.
      Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, 18(3), 218–238. (PMID: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002)
      Haastrup, K., & Henriksen, B. (2000). Vocabulary acquisition: Acquiring depth of knowledge through network building. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00149.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2000.tb00149.x)
      Ha, H. T., & Nguyen, D. T. B. (2023). Using structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between receptive vocabulary knowledge and receptive language proficiency: A new light on an old issue. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33, 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12475.
      Hacking, J. F., & Tschirner, E. (2017). The contribution of vocabulary knowledge to reading proficiency: The case of college Russian. Foreign Language Annals, 50(3), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12282. (PMID: 10.1111/flan.12282)
      Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002089. (PMID: 10.1017/S0272263199002089)
      Johnson, M., Acevedo, A., & Mercado, L. (2016). Vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary use in second language writing. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 700–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.238. (PMID: 10.1002/tesj.238)
      Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Erlbaum.
      Kyle, K. (2020). The relationship between features of source text use and integrated writing quality. Assessing Writing, 45, 100467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100467.
      Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003)
      Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In H. Béjoint & P. Arnaud (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). MacMillan. (PMID: 10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12)
      Laufer, B. (1996). The lexical threshold of second language reading comprehension: What it is and how it relates to L1 reading ability. In K. Sajavaara & C. Fairweather (Eds.), Approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 55–62). University of Jyväskylä.
      Laufer, B., & Aviad-Levitzky, T. (2017). What type of vocabulary knowledge predicts reading comprehension: Word meaning recall or word meaning recognition. Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12431. (PMID: 10.1111/modl.12431)
      Laufer, B., & Cobb, T. (2020). How much knowledge of derived words is needed for Reading? Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 971–998. https://doi.org/10.1093/appplin/amz051. (PMID: 10.1093/appplin/amz051)
      Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge, size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00260.x)
      Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103. (PMID: 10.1177/026553229901600103)
      Lavigne, C. S., Tremblay, K. A., & Binder, K. S. (2022). It’s in the way that you use it: How vocabulary knowledge and usage predict writing quality among adult basic education learners. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 51, 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09877-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s10936-022-09877-5)
      Lee, H., & Anderson, C. (2007). Validity and topic generality of a writing performance test. Language Testing, 24(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207077200. (PMID: 10.1177/0265532207077200)
      Leki, I., & Carson, J. (1997). “Completely different worlds”: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587974. (PMID: 10.2307/3587974)
      Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The effect of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu007. (PMID: 10.1093/applin/amu007)
      Liu, N., & Nation, P. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in Context. RELC Journal, 16(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828501600103. (PMID: 10.1177/003368828501600103)
      Makhoul, B., Sabah, K. (2019). Academic Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension Skills Among Seventh-Graders in Arabic as L1. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 48, 769–784.
      Masrai, A. (2019). Vocabulary and reading comprehension revisited: Evidence for high-, mid-, and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. SAGE Open, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019845182. (PMID: 10.1177/2158244019845182)
      Masrai, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review, 11(3), 423–447. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0106.
      Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2021). How many words do you need to speak Arabic? An Arabic vocabulary size test. The Language Learning Journal, 47(5), 519–536.
      Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015. (PMID: 10.1016/j.system.2015.04.015)
      Matthews, J., Cheng, J., & O’Toole, J. M. (2015). Computer-mediated input, output and feedback in the development of L2 word recognition from speech. ReCALL, 27, 321–339. (PMID: 10.1017/S0958344014000421)
      Mclean, S., Stewart, J., & Batty, A. O. (2020). Predicting l2 reading proficiency with modalities of vocabulary knowledge: A bootstrapping approach. Language Testing, 37(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532219898380.
      Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X., Kourtali, N.-E., Lee, M., & Borges, L. (2020). Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. Second Language Research, 36(3), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320915501. (PMID: 10.1177/0267658320915501)
      Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. Eurosla Monograph Series, 2, 55–78.
      Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: Do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.127. (PMID: 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.127)
      Milton, J., Wade, J., & Hopkins, N. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, & M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 83–98). Multilingual Matters. (PMID: 10.21832/9781847692900-007)
      Miralpeix, I., & Muñoz, C. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0016. (PMID: 10.1515/iral-2017-0016)
      NACFLT. (2000). Syllabus for university English language teaching. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
      Nassaji, H. (2006). The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00431.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00431.x)
      Nation, I. S. P. (1983). Testing and Teaching Vocabulary. Guidelines, 5, 12–25.
      Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Heinle & Heinle.
      Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. (PMID: 10.1017/CBO9781139524759)
      Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59. (PMID: 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59)
      Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–12.
      Pan, R., & Lu, X. (2023). The design and cognitive validity verification of reading-to-write tasks in L2 Chinese writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 56, 100699. (PMID: 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100699)
      Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 11(1), 09–29. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v11i1.623. (PMID: 10.18806/tesl.v11i1.623)
      Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation of source use in integrated writing tasks. Assessing Writing Journal, 17(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002)
      Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.02.003)
      Plakans, L., Gebril, A., & Bilki, Z. (2019). Shaping a score: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in integrated writing performances. Language Testing, 36(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216669537. (PMID: 10.1177/0265532216669537)
      Qian, D. D. (1998). Depth of vocabulary knowledge: Assessing its role in adults’ reading comprehension in English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
      Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282–307. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282. (PMID: 10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282)
      Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193. (PMID: 10.1111/1467-9922.00193)
      Qin, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). The influence of reading texts on L2 reading-to-write argumentative writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655601. (PMID: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655601338152358017206)
      Rashidi, N., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81–108.
      Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229301000308. (PMID: 10.1177/026553229301000308)
      Read, J. (1998). Validating a test to measure depth of vocabulary knowledge. In A. Kunnan (Ed.), Validation in language assessment (pp. 41–60). Lawrence Erlbaum.
      Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge University Press. (PMID: 10.1017/CBO9780511732942)
      Read, J. (2023). Towards a new sophistication in vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 40(1), 40–46. (PMID: 10.1177/02655322221125698)
      Read, J., & Dang, T. N. Y. (2022). Measuring depth of academic vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, Online Published. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221105913. (PMID: 10.1177/13621688221105913)
      Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the Research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077. (PMID: 10.1111/lang.12077)
      Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000018. (PMID: 10.1017/S0261444812000018)
      Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103. (PMID: 10.1177/026553220101800103)
      Schwanenflugel, P. J., Stahl, S. A., & McFalls, E. L. (1997). Partial word knowledge and vocabulary growth during reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969709547973. (PMID: 10.1080/10862969709547973)
      Silverman, R. D., Coker, D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J., Piantedosi, K. W., & Hartranft, A. M. (2015). The relationship between language skills and writing outcomes for linguistically diverse students in upper elementary school. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/683135. (PMID: 10.1086/683135)
      Stæhr, L. S. (2008). Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal, 36(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975. (PMID: 10.1080/09571730802389975)
      The TEM Test Centre. (1997). The test for English majors (TEM) validation study. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
      Truckenmiller, A. J., Petscher, Y. (2020). The role of academic language in written composition in elementary and middle school. Reading and Writing, 33, 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09938-7.
      Varnaseri, M., & Farvardin, M. T. (2016). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and writing performance of Iranian MA students of TEFL. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(2), 544.
      Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232–245. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ815123.pdf.
      Webb, S. A. (2009). The effects of pre-learning vocabulary on reading comprehension and writing. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.441. (PMID: 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.441)
      Wu, S., Dixon, L. Q., Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2019). Breadth or depth: The role of vocabulary in Chinese English language beginning writers’ development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(9), 1356–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1572066. (PMID: 10.1080/13670050.2019.1572066)
      Xue, G. Y., & Nation, I. S. P. (1984). A University word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 215–229.
      Zhang, X. L., & Lu, X. (2013). A longitudinal study of receptive vocabulary breadth knowledge growth and vocabulary fluency development. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt014. (PMID: 10.1093/applin/amt014)
      Zhong, H. F. (2018). The relationship between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A perspective from vocabulary use in sentence writing. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 357–370. (PMID: 10.1080/09571736.2015.1127403)
      Zou, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2002). The relationship between item types, reading strategies and test performance—a study of the response validity of TEM4 reading. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 158(5), 19–22.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Academic vocabulary; Productive/orthographic vocabulary; Productive/phonological vocabulary; Reading-to-write; Receptive/orthographic vocabulary
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20231120 Date Completed: 20231216 Latest Revision: 20231216
    • Publication Date:
      20231217
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s10936-023-10027-8
    • Accession Number:
      37982924