Risk of Pancreatitis With Incretin Therapies Versus Thiazolidinediones in the Veterans Health Administration.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Wilhite K;Wilhite K; Reid JM; Reid JM; Lane M; Lane M
  • Source:
    The Annals of pharmacotherapy [Ann Pharmacother] 2024 Jul; Vol. 58 (7), pp. 685-689. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Oct 26.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Comparative Study
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Sage Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9203131 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1542-6270 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10600280 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Ann Pharmacother Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Sept. 2013- : Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage
      Original Publication: Cincinnati, OH : Harvey Whitney Books Co., c1992-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Incretin therapies, comprised of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), have been increasingly utilized for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Previous studies have conflicting results regarding risk of pancreatitis associated with these agents-some suggest an increased risk and others find no correlation. Adverse event reporting systems indicate that incretin therapies are some of the most common drugs associated with reports of pancreatitis.
      Objectives: This study aimed to compare the odds of developing pancreatitis in veterans with T2DM prescribed an incretin therapy versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs: pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
      Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study analyzing veterans with T2DM first prescribed an incretin therapy or a TZD between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. A diagnosis of pancreatitis within 365 days of being prescribed either therapy was counted as a positive case. Data was collected and analyzed utilizing VA's Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) and an adjusted odds ratio was calculated.
      Results: The TZD cohort consisted of 42 912 patients compared with the incretin cohort of 304 811 patients. The TZD cohort had a pancreatitis incidence rate of 1.94 cases per 1000 patients. The incretin cohort had a incidence rate of 2.06 cases per 1000 patients. An adjusted odds ratio found no statistical difference of pancreatitis cases between the TZD and incretin cohorts (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.94, 95% CI [0.75, 1.18]).
      Conclusion and Relevance: This retrospective cohort study of national VHA data found a relatively low incidence of pancreatitis in both cohorts, and an adjusted odds ratio found no statistical difference of pancreatitis in patients prescribed an incretin therapy compared with a control group. This data adds to growing evidence that incretin therapies do not seem to be associated with an increased risk of developing pancreatitis.
      Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: diabetes; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist; incretin; pancreas; pancreatitis; thiazolidinedione; veterans affairs
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Thiazolidinediones)
      0 (Incretins)
      0 (Hypoglycemic Agents)
      0 (Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors)
      0 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor)
      X4OV71U42S (Pioglitazone)
      05V02F2KDG (Rosiglitazone)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20231026 Date Completed: 20240603 Latest Revision: 20240603
    • Publication Date:
      20240603
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/10600280231205490
    • Accession Number:
      37881914