'I know you like the back of my hand': biometric practices of humanitarian organisations in international aid.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7702072 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1467-7717 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03613666 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Disasters Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Oxford : Blackwell
      Original Publication: Oxford, Elmsford, N. Y., Pergamon Press.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Humanitarian organisations are increasingly utilising biometric data. However, we know little about the extent and scope of this practice, as its benefits and risks have attracted all the attention so far. This paper explores the biometric practices of the United Nations Refugee Agency, the United Nations World Food Programme, the International Committee of the Red Cross, Médecins Sans Frontières, and World Vision International. The study analysed relevant documents published over the past two decades and 17 semi-structured interviews with humanitarian workers conducted between June 2021 and June 2022. The findings reveal that humanitarian organisations use diverse types and functions of biometric data for different services, collaborate with many actors, and employ various data protection measures. Ultimately, challenging the straightforward generalisations about the use of such data, the paper argues that variational applications of biometrics in the humanitarian context require case-by-case analysis, as each instance will likely produce a different outcome.
      (© 2023 The Authors. Disasters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of ODI.)
    • References:
      Ajana, B. (2013) Governing through Biometrics: The Biopolitics of Identity. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
      Aly, H. (2013) ‘What future for private sector involvement in humanitarianism?’. The New Humanitarian website. 26 August. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/analysis/2013/08/26/what-future-private-sector-involvement-humanitarianism (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Amoore, L. (2006) ‘Biometric borders: governing mobilities in the War on Terror’. Political Geography. 25(3). pp. 336-351.
      Baker, S. and Z. Rahman (2020) Understanding the Lived Effects of Digital ID: A Multi-Country Study. January. https://digitalid.theengineroom.org/assets/pdfs/200123_FINAL_TER_Digital_ID_Report+Annexes_English_Interactive.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Barnett, M. and T.G. Weiss (2008) Humanitarianism in Question: Politics, Power, Ethics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
      Bhatnagar, S. and N. Mishra (2020) ‘A review of MRI brain print as hidden biometric’. TEST Engineering and Management. 83 (May-June). pp. 28,571-28,578.
      Burt, C. (2020) ‘Iris biometrics from IrisGuard to enable paperless disbursement of refugee cash aid in Egypt’. BiometricUpdate.com website. 24 February. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202002/iris-biometrics-from-irisguard-to-enable-paperless-disbursement-of-refugee-cash-aid-in-egypt (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Cheesman, M. (2022) ‘Self-sovereignty for refugees? The contested horizons of digital identity’. Geopolitics. 27(1). pp. 134-159.
      Chibafa, K. (2014) ‘Why not digital? Technology as an interagency tool in the Central African Republic’. Humanitarian Exchange. 62 (September). pp. 19-21.
      Currion, P. (2015) ‘Eyes wide shut: the challenge of humanitarian biometrics’. The New Humanitarian website. 26 August. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/opinion/2015/08/26/eyes-wide-shut-challenge-humanitarian-biometrics (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      de Torrenté, N. (2013) ‘The relevance and effectiveness of humanitarian aid: reflections about the relationship between providers and recipients’. Social Research. 80(2). pp. 607-634.
      Delaigue, S. et al. (2018) ‘Seven years of telemedicine in Médecins Sans Frontières demonstrate that offering direct specialist expertise in the frontline brings clinical and educational value’. Journal of Global Health. 8(2). Article number: 020414. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.08.020414.
      EU (European Union) (2016) ‘Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)’. Official Journal of the European Union. 4 May. L 119/1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679#:~:text=This%20Regulation%20respects%20all%20fundamental,conscience%20and%20religion%2C%20freedom%20of (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2005) Biometrics at the Frontiers: Assessing the Impact on Society. EUR 21585 EN. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Brussels.
      Farraj, A. (2011) 'Refugees and the biometric future: the impact of biometrics on refugees and asylum seekers. Columbia Human Rights Law Review. 42(3). pp. 891-941.
      Gazi, T. (2020) ‘Data to the rescue: how humanitarian aid NGOs should collect information based on the G DPR’. Journal of International Humanitarian Action. 5 (July). Article number: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-020-00078-0.
      Gelb, A. and J. Clark (2013) Identification for Development: The Biometrics Revolution. Working Paper 315. January. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.
      Hayes, B. and M. Marelli (2019) ‘Facilitating innovation, ensuring protection: the ICRC Biometrics Policy’. Humanitarian Law & Policy website. 18 October. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2019/10/18/innovation-protection-icrc-biometrics-policy/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Hersey, F. (2021) ‘“You cannot trust a vendor”: understanding biometrics in the humanitarian sector’. BiometricUpdate.com website. 4 October. https://www.biometricupdate.com/202110/you-cannot-trust-a-vendor-understanding-biometrics-in-the-humanitarian-sector (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Holloway, K., R. Al Masri, and A.A. Yahia (2021) Digital Identity, Biometrics and Inclusion in Humanitarian Responses to Refugee Crises. HPG Working Paper. October. Overseas Development Institute, London.
      Hosein, G. and C. Nyst (2013) Aiding Surveillance: An Exploration of How Development and Humanitarian Aid Initiatives are Enabling Surveillance in Developing Countries. October. Privacy International, London.
      Human Rights Watch (2021) ‘UN shared Rohingya data without informed consent’. Website. 15 June. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/06/15/un-shared-rohingya-data-without-informed-consent (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) (2018) ‘Statutes of the International Committee of the Red Cross’. 1 January. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/statutes-international-committee-red-cross-0 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      ICRC (2019a) Annual Report 2019: Volume I. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/annual-report-2019 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      ICRC (2019b) Policy on the Processing of Biometric Data by the ICRC. https://www.icrc.org/en/download/file/106620/icrc_biometrics_policy_adopted_29_august_2019_.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      ICRC (2021a). Annual Report 2021. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/annual-report-2021 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      ICRC (2021b) ‘The biometrics minefield’. ICRC Inspired website. 26 February. https://blogs.icrc.org/inspired/2021/02/26/the-biometrics-minefield/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Jacobsen, K.L. (2015) ‘Experimentation in humanitarian locations: UNHCR and biometric registration of Afghan refugees’. Security Dialogue. 46(2). pp. 144-164.
      Jacobsen, K.L. (2017) ‘On humanitarian refugee biometrics and new forms of intervention’. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 11(4). pp. 529-551.
      Johnson, M. and E. Campbell (2020) ‘Biometrics, refugees, and the Middle East: better data collection for a more just future’. Middle East Institute website. 25 August. https://www.mei.edu/publications/biometrics-refugees-and-middle-east-better-data-collection-more-just-future (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Kaurin, D. (2019) Data Protection and Digital Agency for Refugees. World Refugee Council Research Paper No. 12. May. Centre for International Governance Innovation, Waterloo, ON.
      Knox Clarke, P. (2018) The State of the Humanitarian System. ALNAP (Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action), London.
      Kranzberg, M. (1986) ‘Technology and history: “Kranzberg's Laws”’. Technology and Culture. 27(3). pp. 544-560.
      Kuner, C. and M. Marelli (2017) Handbook on Data Protection in Humanitarian Action. International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva.
      Latonero, M. (2019) ‘Stop surveillance humanitarianism’. The New York Times website. 11 July. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/11/opinion/data-humanitarian-aid.html (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Lee, J. (2015) ‘IOM deploys biometric verification project to help displaced people in Congo’. BiometricUpdate.com website. 5 May. https://www.biometricupdate.com/201505/iom-deploys-biometric-verification-project-to-help-displaced-people-in-congo (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Loy, I. (2021) ‘Biometric data and the Taliban: what are the risks?’. The New Humanitarian website. 2 September. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/interview/2021/2/9/the-risks-of-biometric-data-and-the-taliban (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Lutz, A., A. Doornbos, A. Kehl, A.E. Ghee, and L. DePauw (2017) Data Protection, Privacy and Security for Humanitarian & Development Programs. World Vision International Discussion Paper. https://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/Discussion%20Paper%20-%20Data%20Protection%20Privacy%20%26%20Security%20for%20Humanitarian%20%20%26%20Development%20Programs%20-%20FINAL.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Madianou, M. (2019) ‘The biometric assemblage: surveillance, experimentation, profit, and the measuring of refugee bodies’. Television and New Media. 20(6). pp. 581-599.
      Magnet, S.A. (2011) When Biometrics Fail: Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
      Malik, A.A., E. Mohr, and Y. Irvin-Erickson (2018) Private-Sector Humanitarians? New Approaches in the Global Refugee Response. Research Report. September. Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
      Metcalfe, P. and L. Dencik (2019) ‘The politics of big borders: data (in)justice and the governance of refugees’. First Monday. 24(4). Article number: 9934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i4.9934.
      MSF (Médecins Sans Frontières) (n.d.) Health Data Protection Policy. https://endtb.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/MSF%20Infographics-Health%20Data%20Protection%20Policy_June%202018.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      MSF (2013) Data Sharing Policy. December. https://www.msf.org/sites/default/files/msf_data_sharing_policy_final_061213.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      MSF (2016) ‘Telemedicine helps to bridge the gap between remote areas and large hospitals’. Website. 13 July. https://www.msf.org/telemedicine-280-doctors-little-mohamed (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      MSF (2021) International Financial Report 2021. https://www.msf.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/MSF_Financial_Report_2021_FINAL%20provisional.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      MSF (2022) ‘Telemedicine Data Officer’. Website. https://startup.jobs/telemedicine-data-ofcer-doctors-without-borders-3731900 (last accessed on 9 October 2023).
      NEC Corporation (2021) ‘NEC and ICRC sign memorandum to utilise Japanese technology to resolve humanitarian issues in conflict areas’. Website. 16 June. https://jpn.nec.com/press/202106/20210616_02.html (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Olwig, K.F., K. Grünenberg, P. Møhl, and A. Simonsen (2020) The Biometric Border World: Technologies, Bodies and Identities on the Move. Routledge, London.
      Oxfam (2021) Oxfam Biometric and Foundational Identity Policy. 18 May. https://oxfam.app.box.com/v/OxfamBiometricPolicy (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Parker, B. (2018) ‘Exclusive: audit exposes UN food agency's poor data-handling’. The New Humanitarian website. 18 January. https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news/2018/01/18/exclusive-audit-exposes-un-food-agency-s-poor-data-handling (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Polk, A. (2020) ‘Big brother turns its eye on refugees’. Foreign Policy website. 2 September. https://foreign-policy.com/2020/09/02/big-brother-turns-its-eye-on-refugees/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Prasse-Freeman, E. (2022) ‘Nothing to lose but their (block)chains: biometrics, techno-imaginaries, and transformations in Rohingya lives’. AE: Journal of the American Ethnological Society. 49(4). pp. 563-579.
      Rahman, Z. (2018) Biometrics in the Humanitarian Sector. https://www.theengineroom.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Engine-Room-Oxfam-Biometrics-Review.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Saldinger, A. (2016) ‘Where is the private sector in humanitarian response?’. Devex website. 29 June. https://www.devex.com/news/where-is-the-private-sector-in-humanitarian-response-88328 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Schoemaker, E., D. Baslan, B. Pon, and N. Dell (2020) ‘Identity at the margins: data justice and refugee experiences with digital identity systems in Lebanon, Jordan, and Uganda’. Information Technology for Development. 27(1). pp. 13-36.
      Shamir, L., S. Ling, S. Rahimi, L. Ferrucci, and I.G. Goldberg (2009) ‘Biometric identification using knee X-rays’. International Journal of Biometeorology. 1(2). pp. 365-370.
      Staehelin, B. (2020) ‘Humanitarian effectiveness through new technology requires standards of control over data, data integrity and data availability’. International Committee of the Red Cross website. 10 June. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/humanitarian-effectiveness-through-new-technology-requires-standards-control-over-data-data (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Sukaitis, J. (2021) Building a Path Towards Responsible Use of Biometrics: A Proposal for Security and Data Privacy Evaluation of Biometric Systems. Master's thesis, École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/285077?ln=en (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Swithern, S. (2015) Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2015. http://www.globalhumanitarianassistance.org/report/gha-report-2015 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Tekle, T.-A. (2020) ‘Refugees in Ethiopia's camps raise privacy and exclusion concerns over UNHCR's new digital registration’. Global Voices website. 19 March. https://advox.globalvoices.org/2020/03/19/refugees-in-ethiopias-camps-raise-privacy-and-exclusion-concerns-over-unhcrs-new-digital-registration/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UN OCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) (2021) From Digital Promise to Frontline Practice: New and Emerging Technologies in Humanitarian Action. April. https://www.unocha.org/publication/policy-briefs-studies/digital-promise-frontline-practice-new-and-emerging-technologies (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UN OCHA (2022) Global Humanitarian Overview 2022. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-humanitarian-overview-2022 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) (2003) ‘Afghanistan: Iris-testing proves successful’. Briefing Notes. 10 October. https://www.unhcr.org/news/briefing/2003/10/3f86a3ac1/afghanistaniris-testing-proves-successful.html (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (2015a) ‘Biometric Identity Management System’. Brochure. http://www.unhcr.org/protection/basic/550c304c9/biometric-identity-management-system.html (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (2015b) Policy on the Protection of Personal Data of Persons of Concern to UNHCR. May. https://www.refworld.org/docid/55643c1d4.html (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (2019). Global Report 2019. https://www.unhcr.org/globalreport2019/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (2021a) Update on Budgets and Funding (2020-2021). Executive Committee of the High Commissioner's Programme. EC/72/SC/CRP.7. 4 March. https://www.unhcr.org/uk/media/update-budgets-and-funding-ec-72-sc-crp-7 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (2021b) ‘Government of Pakistan delivers first new biometric identity smartcards to Afghan refugees’. Website. 25 May. https://www.unhcr.org/asia/news/press/2021/5/60ae48424/government-of-pakistan-delivers-first-new-biometric-identity-smartcards.html (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR (2022) Biometrics. https://help.unhcr.org/jordan/wp-content/uploads/sites/46/2022/04/Biometrics-EN_Final_April2022.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR and WFP (World Food Programme) (2018) Addendum on Data Sharing to the January 2011 Memorandum of Understanding Between the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the World Food Programme (WFP). September. https://emergency.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/WFP%20Addendum%20on%20data%20sharing%20%282018%29.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      UNHCR and WFP (2020) Joint Guidance: Targeting of Assistance to Meet Basic Needs. https://www.unhcr.org/media/joint-guidance-targeting-assistance-meet-basic-needs (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      United States Department of Homeland Security (2019) Privacy Impact Assessment for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) Information Data Share. DHS/USCIS/PIA-081. 13 August. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/privacy-pia-uscis081-unhcr-august2019.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Weitzberg, K., M. Cheesman, A. Martin, and E. Schoemaker (2021) ‘Between surveillance and recognition: rethinking digital identity in aid’. Big Data & Society. 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211006744.
      Wendehorst, C. and Y. Duller (2021) Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection. PE 696.968. August. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2021)696968 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (World Food Programme) (2014) SCOPE in Five Minutes. https://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/communications/wfp272586.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2015) Annual Performance Report for 2014. https://documents.wfp.org/stellent/groups/public/documents/eb/wfpdoc063825.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2016) WFP Guide to Personal Data Protection and Privacy. June. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/e8d24e70cc11448383495caca154cb97/download/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2017a) ‘Blockchain against hunger: harnessing technology in support of Syrian refugees’. Website. 30 May. https://www.wfp.org/news/blockchain-against-hunger-harnessing-technology-support-syrian-refugees (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2017b) ‘First cash assistance to secondary girl students using biometrics in Fata’. Website. 24 May. https://www.wfp.org/news/first-cash-assistance-secondary-girl-students-using-biometrics-fata (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2018) Annual Performance Report for 2017. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/5c0a93ecec0f4dcc9916c3978bae238e/download/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2019a) ‘IOM, WFP conduct first beneficiary data exchange in South Sudan’. Website. 27 June. https://www.wfp.org/news/iom-wfp-conduct-first-beneficiary-data-exchange-south-sudan (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2019b) ‘World Food Programme begins partial suspension of aid in Yemen’. Website. 20 June. https://www.wfp.org/news/world-food-programme-begins-partial-suspension-aid-yemen (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2020a) Afghanistan: Annual Country Report 2020. https://www.wfp.org/publications/annual-country-reports-afghanistan (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2020b) WFP: Philippines Country Brief. December 2020. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000122988/download/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WFP (2021) Annual Performance Report for 2020. https://www.wfp.org/publications/annual-performance-report-2020 (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      Willems, A. (2018) ‘Ebola vaccine Deployment, Acceptance and Compliance (EBODAC) - the simple story’. European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations website. 3 September. https://www.efpia.eu/news-events/the-efpia-view/blog-articles/03092018-ebola-vaccine-deployment-acceptance-and-compliance-ebodac-the-simple-story-guest-blog/ (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WVI (World Vision International) (n.d.) ‘How LMMS works’. Website. https://www.wvi.org/disaster-management/how-lmms-works (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WVI (2018) EBODAC: Ebola Vaccine Trial Brochure. https://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/EBODAC_Flyer_2018-06-14_v08_final.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
      WVI (2021) Global Annual Report 2020. https://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/World%20Vision%20International%20Global%20Annual%20Report%202020%20%282%29.pdf (last accessed on 5 October 2023).
    • Grant Information:
      Agency for Management of University and Research Grants of the Government of Catalonia
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: biometrics; data; humanitarian aid; humanitarian organisations; international aid; technology
      Local Abstract: [Publisher, Arabic] تستخدم المنظمات الإنسانيَّة البيانات البيومترية بشكلٍ متزايد. إلا أننا نعلم القليل بشأن مدى هذه الممارسة والغرض منها، فقد جلبت مزاياها ومخاطرها الأنظار إليها إلى حد بعيد؛ لذا، بحثت هذه الورقة حول ماهية الممارسات البيومترية التابعة لوكالة الأمم المتحدة للاجئين، وبرنامج الأغذية العالمي التابع للأمم المتحدة، ولجنة الصليب الأحمر الدولية، ومنظمتي أطباء بلا حدود، و الرؤى الدوليَّة «وورلد فيجن انترناشونال»، ثم حللت الوثائق ذات الصلة المنشورة منذ عقدي ماضيين، وسبع عشرة مقابلات شبه منظمة مع العاملين في المجال الإنساني، والتي أجريت في الفترة بين يونيو 2021 ويونيو 2022. واستعرضت نتائجها بأن المنظمات الإنسانيَّة تستخدم البيانات البيومترية باختلاف صورها ووظائفها لأداء العديد من الخدمات، والتعاون مع الكثير من الجهات الفاعلة، واستخدام تدابير حماية البيانات المختلفة. وعن مناهضة التعميم الصريح بشأن استخدام تلك البيانات، تستعرض المقالة التطبيقات المتعددة للقياسات الحيويَّة في السياقات الإنسانيَّة التي تستلزم تحليل حالة تلو الأخرى، فمن الممكن أن يترتب على ذلك نتائج مختلفة. الكلمات الافتتاحيَّة: القياسات الحيويَّة، والبيانات، والمساعدات، والمنظَّمات الإنسانيَّة، والتكنولوجيا. [Publisher, Chinese] 人道主義組織逐漸增加對生物辨識資料的使用。然而,我們對於這種做法的程度和範圍的認知僅有一星半點,因為迄今為止它的益處和風險吸引了所有的注意力。本文探討了聯合國難民署、聯合國世界糧食計劃署、紅十字國際委員會、無國界醫生及世界展望會的生物辨識做法。本文分析了過去二十年間發表的相關文件及2021年6月至2022年6月期間對人道主義工作者進行的17次引導式訪談。調查結果顯示,人道主義組織針對不同的服務使用了各式各樣的類型和功能的生物辨識資料、與許多行動者共同作業,並使用各種資料保護措施。最後,本文對關於此類資料使用的明確陳述提出了挑戰,認為人道主義環境中的各種生物辨識技術應用需要逐案分析,因為每個案例使用都可能會產生不同的結果。 關鍵詞:生物辨識、資料、人道主義援助、人道主義組織、技術.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20230927 Date Completed: 20240315 Latest Revision: 20240315
    • Publication Date:
      20240315
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/disa.12612
    • Accession Number:
      37756185