Disembodied, dehumanised but safe and feasible: The social-spatial flow of a pandemic OSCE.

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 7605655 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2923 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03080110 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med Educ Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell
Original Publication: Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.

Pandemics* ; COVID-19*; Humans ; Educational Measurement ; Physical Examination ; Clinical Competence

Introduction: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a key feature of healthcare education assessment. Many aspects of the OSCE are well-investigated, but not so its sociomaterial assemblage. The Covid-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to (re)consider taken-for-granted OSCE practices. Drawing on Law's modes of ordering, our aim was to demonstrate the 'mangle of practice' between space and people; the spatialised and spatialising processes of an OSCE.
Methods: We used a case study approach to critically examine a redesigned final year MBChB OSCE held during the pandemic. We used multiple sources of data to attune to human and non-human actors: OSCE documentation, photographs, field notes and semi-structured interviews with OSCE staff/organisers. Law's modes of ordering was used as an analytical lens to critically consider how people and things flowed through the adapted OSCE.
Findings: The overarching ordering was the delivery of a 'pandemic safe' OSCE. This necessitated reordering of 'usual' process to deliver a socially distanced, safe flow of human and non-human actors through the assessment space. Each change had material and social 'knock on' effects. We identified three main interrelated orderings: Substituting technologies for bodies: Disembodied and dehumanised but feasible; Flow through space: Architectural affordances and one-way traffic; Barriers to flow: Time and technology.
Discussion: Looking at the OSCE through a sociomaterial lens allows us to critically examine the OSCE's essential and complex processes and the restrictions and affordances of the spaces and props within the OSCE. In doing so, we open the possibility of considering alternative ways of doing OSCEs in the future. Moreover, conceptualising the OSCE as a living set of socially (human) and materially (nonhuman) enacted processes changes the social perception of the OSCE and highlights that an OSCE has agency on people, places and things.
(© 2023 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Pell G, Homer M, Fuller R. Investigating disparity between global grades and checklist scores in OSCEs. Med Teach. 2015;37(12):1106-1113. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1009425.
Violato C. Assessing Competence in Medicine and Other Health Professions. CRC Press; 2019:2018. doi:10.1201/9780429426728.
Regehr G, MacRae H, Reznick RK, Szalay D. Comparing the psychometric properties of checklists and global rating scales for assessing performance on an OSCE-format examination. Acad Med. 1998;73(9):993-997. doi:10.1097/00001888-199809000-00020.
Newble DI, Swanson DB. Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ. 1988;22(4):325-334. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00761.x.
Yeates P, Moreau M, Eva K. Are examiners' judgments in OSCE-style assessments influenced by contrast effects? Acad Med. 2015;90(7):975-980. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000650.
Yeates P, Cardell J, Byrne G, Eva KW. Relatively speaking: contrast effects influence assessors' scores and narrative feedback. Med Educ. 2015;49(9):909-919. doi:10.1111/medu.12777.
Duncumb M, Cleland J. Student perceptions of a sequential Objective Structured Clinical Examination. J Royal College Phys Edinburgh. 2019;49(3):245-249. doi:10.4997/jrcpe.2019.315.
Majumder MAA, Kumar A, Krishnamurthy K, Ojeh N, Adams OP, Sa B. An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:387-397. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S197275.
Fenwick T. Sociomateriality in medical practice and learning: attuning to what matters. Med Educ. 2014;48(1):44-52. doi:10.1111/medu.12295.
Fenwick T, Nimmo G. Making visible what matters: sociomaterial approaches for research and practice in healthcare education. In: Cleland J, Durning SJ, eds. Researching Medical Education. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781118838983.ch7.
MacLeod A, Ajjawi R. Thinking sociomaterially. Acad Med. 2020;95(6):851-855. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003143.
Rees CE, Ottrey E, Barton P, et al. Materials matter: understanding the importance of sociomaterial assemblages for OSCE candidate performance. Med Educ. 2021;55(8):961-971. doi:10.1111/medu.14521.
Bearman M, Ajjawi R, Bennett S, Boud D. The hidden labours of designing the Objective Structured Clinical Examination: a practice theory study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2021;26(2):637-651. doi:10.1007/s10459-020-10015-w.
Bearman M, Ajjawi R. Actor-network theory and the OSCE: formulating a new research agenda for a post-psychometric era. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(5):1037-1049. doi:10.1007/s10459-017-9797-7.
Tai J, Mahoney P, Ajjawi R, et al. How are examinations inclusive for students with disabilities in higher education? A sociomaterial analysis. Assess Eval High Educ. 2022;1-13.
Bleakley A, Bligh J, Browne J. Power in Medical Education; 2011:119-134. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9692-0_9.
Gormley GJ, Hodges BD, McNaughton N, Johnston JL. The show must go on? Patients, props and pedagogy in the theatre of the OSCE. Med Educ. 2016;50(12):1237-1240. doi:10.1111/medu.13016.
Orlikowski WJ. Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organ Stud. 2007;28(9):1435-1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138.
Werner RM, Glied SA. Covid-induced changes in health care delivery-can they last? N Engl J Med. 2021;385(10):868-870. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2110679.
Singleton G, Dowrick A, Manby L, et al. UK healthcare workers' experiences of major system change in elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: reflections on rapid service adaptation. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;11(10):2072-2082. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.101.
Choi B, Jegatheeswaran L, Minocha A, Alhilani M, Nakhoul M, Mutengesa E. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: a national survey. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):206. doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02117-1.
Mian A, Khan S. Medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):100. doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01577-y.
Alsafi Z, Abbas AR, Hassan A, Ali MA. The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: adaptations in medical education. Int J Surg. 2020;78:64-65. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.083.
Darling-Pomranz C, Gray J, Watson C. Undertaking a face to face summative OSCE assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic-a descriptive narrative [version 2]. MedEdPublish. 2020;9(1):244. doi:10.15694/mep.2020.000244.1.
Law J. Organising Modernity: Social Ordering and Social Theory. Wiley-Blackwell; 1993.
Mulcahy MD. Turning around the question of ‘transfer’ in education: tracing the sociomaterial. Educ Philos Theory. 2013;45(12):1276-1289. doi:10.1080/00131857.2013.763592.
Mulcahy D, Cleveland B, Aberton H. Learning spaces and pedagogic change: envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagog Cult Soc. 2015;23(4):575-595. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128.
Soja E. The socio-spatial dialectic. Ann Assoc am Geographers. 1980;70(2):207-225.
Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV. Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology. Work Organization Acad Manag Ann. 2008;2(1):433-474. doi:10.5465/19416520802211644.
MacLeod A, Cameron P, Ajjawi R, Kits O, Tummons J. Actor-network theory and ethnography: sociomaterial approaches to researching medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8(3):177-186. doi:10.1007/S40037-019-0513-6.
Cleland J, MacLeod A, Ellaway RH. The curious case of case study research. Med Educ. 2021;55(10):1131-1141. doi:10.1111/medu.14544.
Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Med Teach. 2013 Sep 22;35(9):e1437-e1446. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.818634.
Cleland J, MacLeod A. The visual vernacular: embracing photographs in research. Perspect Med Educ. 2021;10(4):230-237. doi:10.1007/S40037-021-00672-X.
Fenwick T, Edwards R, Sawchuk P. Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material. Routledge; 2011.
DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):314-321. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
Radley A. What people do with pictures. Vis Stud. 2010;25(3):268-279. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.523279.
Patton M. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage; 1990:169-186.
MacLeod A, Kits O, Mann K, Tummons J, Wilson KW. The invisible work of distributed medical education: exploring the contributions of audiovisual professionals, administrative professionals and faculty teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2017;22(3):623-638. doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9695-4.
Holm G. Photograph as a research method. In: Leavy P, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research; 2014. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.031.
Knox H, O'Doherty D, Vurdubakis T, Westrup C. Enacting airports: space, movement and modes of ordering. Organization. 2008;15(6):869-888. doi:10.1177/1350508408095818.
Booth RG, Andrusyszyn MA, Iwasiw C, Donelle L, Compeau D. Actor-network theory as a sociotechnical lens to explore the relationship of nurses and technology in practice: methodological considerations for nursing research. Nurs Inq. 2016;23(2):109-120. doi:10.1111/nin.12118.
Barad K. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press; 2007. doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq.
Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press; 2005.
Hawick L, Kitto S, Cleland J. Contact is not enough: a qualitative study of how space and place impact on interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2021;35(5):710-717. doi:10.1080/13561820.2020.1812551.
MacLeod A, Kits O, Whelan E, et al. Sociomateriality: a theoretical framework for studying distributed medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1451-1456. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000708.
McGrath L, Brown SD, Kanyeredzi A, Reavey P, Tucker I. Peripheral recovery: ‘keeping safe’ and ‘keep progressing’ as contradictory modes of ordering in a forensic psychiatric unit. Environ Plan D. 2021;39(4):704-721. doi:10.1177/02637758211013032.
Cleland J. The “uncurated exposure” of videoconferencing. Acad Med. 2020;95(9):1293-1294. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003533.
MacLeod A, Cameron P, Kits O, Tummons J. Technologies of exposure: videoconferenced distributed medical education as a sociomaterial practice. Acad Med. 2019;94(3):412-418. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002536.
Hodges B. OSCE! Variations on a theme by harden. Med Educ. 2003;37(12):1134-1140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2003.01717.x.
Cleland JA. The qualitative orientation in medical education research. Korean J Med Educ. 2017;29(2):61-71. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.53.
Brown C, Ross S, Cleland J, Walsh K. Money makes the (medical assessment) world go round: the cost of components of a summative final year Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Med Teach. 2015;37(7):653-659. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1033389.
Fenwick T, Dahlgren MA. Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory. Med Educ. 2015;49(4):359-367. doi:10.1111/medu.12638.
Formanowicz M, Roessel J, Suitner C, Maass A. Verbs as linguistic markers of agency: the social side of grammar. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2017;47(5):566-579. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2231.

Date Created: 20230730 Date Completed: 20240123 Latest Revision: 20240216

20240216

10.1111/medu.15173

37517448