Clinical comparative analysis of bacterial keratitis according to contact lens use: a retrospective study in a tertiary referral center of South Korea.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Moon CW;Moon CW; Cho CH; Cho CH; Lee SB; Lee SB
  • Source:
    International ophthalmology [Int Ophthalmol] 2023 Oct; Vol. 43 (10), pp. 3509-3521. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Jul 26.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Kluwer Country of Publication: Netherlands NLM ID: 7904294 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-2630 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01655701 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int Ophthalmol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Dordrecht : Kluwer
      Original Publication: The Hague, Junk.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: To compare the clinical aspects and treatment outcomes of contact lens-related bacterial keratitis (CLBK) and non-CLBK patients.
      Methods: Altogether 217 patients of bacterial keratitis (CLBK; 62, non-CLBK; 155) hospitalized between January 2012 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed for epidemiology, microbiological profiles, predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes. Poor treatment outcomes (PTO) were defined as a final BCVA < 0.3 (Snellen), a decreased visual acuity after treatment, complications, or surgical intervention. Relative importance of the initial clinical features leading to PTO was assessed using the random forest model and two-proportion Z-test.
      Results: The most common predisposing factors were sleeping with wearing CL (51.6%) in the CLBK group and trauma (55.5%) in the non-CLBK group. There were significant differences between the two groups in mean age (35.1:55.1 years, p < 0.001), female sex (56.5:34.8%, p = 0.003), symptom duration (6.2:6.9 days, p = 0.019), gram-negative organisms (83.3:48.3%, p = 0.008), epithelial healing time (8.5:14.1 days, p = 0.004), final BCVA (0.15:0.46 logMAR, p = 0.015), and PTO (9.7:21.9%, p = 0.035). For the entire group, the initial BCVA < 0.1 (27.9%), symptom duration ≥ 5 days (19.4%), age ≥ 60 years (16.4%), and hypopyon (14.0%) were important initial clinical features leading to PTO in the random forest model. In CLBK group, the type of CL or CL-related history was not significantly related to PTO.
      Conclusion: CLBK patients had a higher proportion of females, younger age, gram-negative bacteria, and better treatment outcomes than those of non-CLBK patients. There were no significant risk factors leading to PTO in either the type of CL or CL-related history.
      (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)
    • References:
      Ung L, Bispo PJM, Shanbhag SS, Gilmore MS, Chodosh J (2019) The persistent dilemma of microbial keratitis: global burden, diagnosis, and antimicrobial resistance. Surv Ophthalmol 64:255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.12.003. (PMID: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.12.00330590103)
      Shah A, Sachdev A, Coggon D, Hossain P (2011) Geographic variations in microbial keratitis: an analysis of the peer-reviewed literature. Br J Ophthalmol 95:762–767. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.169607. (PMID: 10.1136/bjo.2009.16960721478201)
      Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Taylor HR, Snibson GR, Forde K, Stapleton F (2006) Microbial keratitis predisposing factors and morbidity. Ophthalmology 113:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.08.013. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.08.01316360210)
      Koh YY, Sun CC, Hsiao CH (2020) Epidemiology and the estimated burden of microbial keratitis on the health care system in Taiwan: a 14-year population-based Study. Am J Ophthalmol 220:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.026. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.02632707204)
      Bourcier T, Thomas F, Borderie V, Chaumeil C, Laroche L (2003) Bacterial keratitis: predisposing factors, clinical and microbiological review of 300 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 87:834–838. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.7.834. (PMID: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.834128128781771775)
      Schaefer F, Bruttin O, Zografos L, Guex-Crosier Y (2001) Bacterial keratitis: a prospective clinical and microbiological study. Br J Ophthalmol 85:842–847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.85.7.842. (PMID: 10.1136/bjo.85.7.842114234601724042)
      Keay L, Edwards K, Stapleton F (2009) Signs, symptoms, and comorbidities in contact lens-related microbial keratitis. Optom Vis Sci 86:803–809. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e3181ae1b69. (PMID: 10.1097/opx.0b013e3181ae1b6919543137)
      Morgan PB, Efron N, Brennan NA, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Tullo AB (2005) Risk factors for the development of corneal infiltrative events associated with contact lens wear. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci 46:3136–3143. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0133. (PMID: 10.1167/iovs.05-0133)
      Lam DSC, Houang E, Fan DSP, Lyon D, Seal D, Wong E (2002) Incidence and risk factors for microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: comparison with Europe and North America. Eye 16:608–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700151. (PMID: 10.1038/sj.eye.670015112194077)
      Green M, Apel A, Stapleton F (2008) Risk factors and causative organisms in microbial keratitis. Cornea 27:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0b013e318156caf2. (PMID: 10.1097/ico.0b013e318156caf218245962)
      Stapleton F, Shrestha GS, Vijay AK, Carnt N (2022) Epidemiology, microbiology, and genetics of contact lens–related and non–contact lens-related infectious keratitis. Eye Contact Lens 48:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000884. (PMID: 10.1097/icl.000000000000088435192567)
      Cope JR, Collier SA, Nethercut H, Jones JM, Yates K, Yoder JS (2017) Risk behaviors for contact lens-related eye infections among adults and adolescents - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66:841–845. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6632a2.
      Mukerji N, Vajpayee RB, Sharma N (2003) Technique of area measurement of epithelial defects. Cornea 22:549–551. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200308000-00012. (PMID: 10.1097/00003226-200308000-0001212883349)
      Green MD, Apel AJG, Naduvilath T, Stapleton FJ (2007) Clinical outcomes of keratitis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01511.x. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01511.x17651246)
      Hazra A (2017) Using the confidence interval confidently. J Thorac Dis 9:4125–4130. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.09.14. (PMID: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.14292684245723800)
      Botelho PJ, Johnson LN, Arnold AC (1996) The effect of aspirin on the visual outcome of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol 121:450–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70448-9. (PMID: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70448-98604744)
      Green M, Sara S, Hughes I, Apel A, Stapleton F (2019) Trends in contact lens microbial keratitis 1999 to 2015: a retrospective clinical review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 47:726–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13484. (PMID: 10.1111/ceo.1348430801907)
      Spernovasilis N, Maraki S, Kokorakis E, Kofteridis D, Tsilimbaris M, Siganos C, Samonis G (2021) Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated pathogens from patients with contact lens-related bacterial keratitis in Crete, Greece: a ten-year analysis. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 44:101355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2020.07.006. (PMID: 10.1016/j.clae.2020.07.00632778366)
      Lim CHL, Carnt NA, Farook M, Lam J, Tan DT, Mehta JS, Stapleton F (2016) Risk factors for contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Singapore. Eye 30:447–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.250. (PMID: 10.1038/eye.2015.25026634710)
      Enzor R, Bowers EMR, Perzia B, Perera C, Palazzolo L, Mammen A, Dhaliwal DK, Kowalski RP, Jhanji V (2021) Comparison of clinical features and treatment outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis in contact lens and non–contact lens wearers. Am J Ophthalmol 227:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.024. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.02433657419)
      Raj N, Gupta N, Kumar D, Vashist P, Tandon R (2021) Population-based study on the prevalence, clinical characteristics and vision-related quality of life in patients with corneal opacity resulting from infectious keratitis: results from the Corneal Opacity Rural Epidemiological study. Br J Ophthalmol bjophthalmol-2021–320077. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320077.
      Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR (1989) The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. N Engl J Med 321:773–778. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198909213211201. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJM1989092132112012671733)
      Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Whiting MA, Tullo AB (2005) Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol 89:430–436. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.052688. (PMID: 10.1136/bjo.2004.052688157749191772596)
      Morgan PB, Efron N, Toshida H, Nichols JJ (2011) An international analysis of contact lens compliance. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 34:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2011.08.001. (PMID: 10.1016/j.clae.2011.08.00121868279)
      Farooq AV, Hou JH, Jassim S, Haq Z, Tu EY, de la Cruz J, Cortina MS (2018) Biofilm formation on bandage contact lenses worn by patients with the Boston type 1 Keratoprosthesis: a pilot comparison study of prophylactic topical vancomycin 15 mg/mL and linezolid 0.2%. Eye Contact Lens 44:S106–S109. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000337.
      Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Dart JKG, Brian G, Holden BA (2008) The incidence of contact lens–related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmology 115:1655–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.002. (PMID: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.00218538404)
      Agi J, Rocchetti TT, Yu MCZ, Farah ML, Ramos F, Freitas DD, Höfling-Lima AL (2021) Three decades of contact lens-associated microbial keratitis in a referral hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Arq Bras Oftalmol 84:474–480. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20210079. (PMID: 10.5935/0004-2749.2021007934320109)
      McLaughlin-Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, Dart JK (1998) Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol 84:827–838. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00418.x. (PMID: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00418.x9674137)
      Fleiszig SMJ, Kroken AR, Nieto V, Grosser MR, Wan SJ, Metruccio MME, Evans DJ (2020) Contact lens-related corneal infection: intrinsic resistance and its compromise. Prog Retin Eye Res 76:100804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.100804. (PMID: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.10080431756497)
      Kodjikian L, Casoli-Bergeron E, Malet F, Janin-Manificat H, Freney J, Burillon C, Colin J, Steghens J-P (2008) Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 246:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0703-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00417-007-0703-5)
      Vijay AK, Zhu H, Ozkan J, Wu D, Masoudi S, Bandara R, Borazjani RN, Willcox MDP (2012) Bacterial adhesion to unworn and worn silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci 89:1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e318264f4dc. (PMID: 10.1097/opx.0b013e318264f4dc22820469)
      Bennett L, Hsu HY, Tai S, Ernst B, Schmidt EJ, Parihar R, Horwood C, Edelstein SL (2019) Contact lens versus non–contact lens–related corneal ulcers at an academic center. Eye Contact Lens 45:301–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000568. (PMID: 10.1097/icl.000000000000056831442212)
      Karaca I, Barut Selver O, Palamar M, Egrilmez S, Aydemir S, Yagci A (2020) Contact lens–associated microbial keratitis in a tertiary eye care center in Turkey. Eye Contact Lens 46:110–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000617. (PMID: 10.1097/icl.000000000000061731045617)
      Mayo MS, Schlitzer RL, Ward MA, Wilson LA, Ahearn DG (1987) Association of Pseudomonas and Serratia corneal ulcers with use of contaminated solutions. J Clin Microbiol 25:1398–1400. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.25.8.1398-1400.1987. (PMID: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1398-1400.19873114318269233)
      Stern GA (1998) Contact lens associated bacterial keratitis: past, present, and future. CLAO J 24:52–56. (PMID: 9474455)
      Zhu B, Liu Y, Lin L, Huang X, Zhang Y, Zheng J, Jin X (2019) Characteristics of infectious keratitis in bandage contact lens wear patients. Eye Contact Lens 45:356–359. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000593. (PMID: 10.1097/icl.000000000000059331453822)
      Miedziak AI, Miller MR, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ (1999) Risk factors in microbial keratitis leading to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 106:1166–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90250-6. (PMID: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90250-610366087)
      Konda N, Garg P, Sharma S, Willcox MDP (2021) Risk factors for contact lens-related microbial keratitis and associated vision loss in a South Indian population. Eye Contact Lens 47:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000737. (PMID: 10.1097/ICL.000000000000073733009258)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Bacterial keratitis; Contact lens; Corneal ulcer; Random forest model
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Anti-Bacterial Agents)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20230726 Date Completed: 20230918 Latest Revision: 20230922
    • Publication Date:
      20250114
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s10792-023-02756-5
    • Accession Number:
      37493928