An intervention to promote positive homeworker health and wellbeing through effective home-working practices: a feasibility and acceptability study.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

COVID-19* ; Health Promotion*; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Exercise ; Feasibility Studies ; Health Behavior ; Young Adult ; Adult ; Middle Aged ; Teleworking

Background: In the wake of Covid-19, the prevalence of working from home ('home-working') is expected to rise. Yet, working from home can have negative health and wellbeing impacts. Interventions are needed to promote effective ways of working that also protect workers' health and wellbeing. This study explored the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention intended to promote home-working practices that would protect and promote health behaviour and wellbeing.
Methods: An uncontrolled, single-arm mixed-methods trial design was employed. Forty-two normally-office-based UK workers, working from home between January-February 2021 (during the Covid pandemic), consented to receive the intervention. The intervention: a digital document offering evidence-based recommendations for home-working in ways conducive to health behaviour and wellbeing. Feasibility and acceptability were quantitatively indexed by: expressions of interest within 1 week (target threshold ≥ 35); attrition across the one-week study period (threshold ≤ 20%); and the absence of any apparent detriments in self-reported physical activity, sedentary behaviour, snacking, and work-related wellbeing prior to and one week after receiving the intervention. Qualitative think-aloud data, obtained while participants read through the intervention, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, explored acceptability. Semi-structured interviews conducted one week after intervention exposure were content-analysed to identify whether and which behaviour changes were adopted.
Results: Two feasibility criteria were met: 85 expressions of interest indicated satisfactory intervention demand, and no detriments were observed in health behaviours or wellbeing. Forty-two participants (i.e., maximum capacity for the study; 26 females, 16 males, aged 22-63) consented to take part. 31% dropped out over the one-week study period leaving a final sample of 29 (18 females, 11 males, aged 22-63), exceeding identified attrition thresholds. Think-aloud data showed that participants concurred with intervention guidance, but felt it lacked novelty and practicality. Follow-up interviews produced 18 (62%) participant reports of intervention adherence, where nine recommendations reportedly prompted behaviour change in at least one participant.
Conclusions: Mixed evidence was found for intervention feasibility and acceptability. Whilst the information was deemed relevant and of value, further development is required to increase its novelty. It may also be more fruitful to provide this information via employers, to encourage and emphasise employer endorsement.
(© 2023. The Author(s).)

Trials. 2014 Jul 03;15:264. (PMID: 24993581)
Arzneimittelforschung. 1978;28(11):2169-72. (PMID: 40568)
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Apr;48(4):433-442. (PMID: 31444097)
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Feb;40(1):78-82. (PMID: 26455349)
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. (PMID: 23512568)
Lancet. 2002 Mar 2;359(9308):781-5. (PMID: 11888606)
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Dec 1;63(12):1065-1072. (PMID: 34560760)
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. (PMID: 21513547)
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. (PMID: 20957426)
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Sep;22(9):1973-80. (PMID: 24942930)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 23;16(19):. (PMID: 31547516)
AIMS Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;9(3):574-588. (PMID: 36330289)
Work. 2013 Jan 1;46(1):39-49. (PMID: 23241703)
J Occup Environ Med. 2022 Nov 17;:. (PMID: 36395077)
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 14;12:348. (PMID: 22583789)
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1473-1480. (PMID: 33963864)
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 05;16:933. (PMID: 27595754)
Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):8-24. (PMID: 21172767)
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 17;15:9. (PMID: 25595219)
Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Nov 11;:1-14. (PMID: 36343923)
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Sep 03;9(9):. (PMID: 34574925)
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jul 29;4:954639. (PMID: 35966113)
AIMS Public Health. 2016 May 30;3(2):341-347. (PMID: 29546167)
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 02;8(10):e76723. (PMID: 24098555)
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0198483. (PMID: 29944662)
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):1. (PMID: 29611687)
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152. (PMID: 23151820)
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e103892. (PMID: 25078965)
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003 Dec;18(8):603-10. (PMID: 14696019)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. (PMID: 28126032)
Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. (PMID: 19362699)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 21;8:115. (PMID: 22018588)
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Jul 1;48(5):380-390. (PMID: 35470862)
Rev Econ Househ. 2020;18(4):1001-1017. (PMID: 32922242)
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):93. (PMID: 30404638)
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 30;9:584. (PMID: 29760670)
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Mar 1;63(3):181-190. (PMID: 33234875)
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):47. (PMID: 28148236)
Work. 2021;69(3):741-749. (PMID: 34180447)
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;10:774509. (PMID: 35155324)

Keywords: Acceptability; Digital intervention; Feasibility; Health-behaviour; Homeworking; Wellbeing

Date Created: 20230330 Date Completed: 20230403 Latest Revision: 20230407

20231215

PMC10063430

10.1186/s12889-023-15347-x

36997955