Preschoolers modulate contrastive inferences during online language comprehension.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0372725 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1467-8624 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00093920 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Child Dev Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers
      Original Publication: [Chicago, etc.] : Published by the University of Chicago Press for the Society for Research in Child Development [etc.]
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      This study examined 4- and 5-year-olds' incremental interpretation of size adjectives, focusing on whether contrastive inferences are modulated by speaker behavior. Children (N = 120, 59 females, mostly White, tested between July, 2018 and August, 2019) encountered either a conventional or unconventional speaker who labeled objects in a correspondingly typical or atypical way. Critical utterances contained size adjectives (e.g., "Look at the big duck"). With conventional speakers, gaze measures indicated that children rapidly used the adjective to differentiate members of a contrasting pair, indicating that even 4-year-olds derive contrastive inferences. With unconventional speakers, contrastive inferences were delayed in processing. The findings demonstrate that preschoolers adjust their use of pragmatic cues when presented with evidence disconfirming their default assumptions about a speaker.
      (© 2023 The Authors. Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.)
    • References:
      Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
      Berman, J. M., Graham, S. A., Callaway, D., & Chambers, C. G. (2013). Preschoolers use emotion in speech to learn new words. Child Development, 84, 1791-1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12074.
      Bohn, M., Tessler, M. H., Merrick, M., & Frank, M. C. (2021). How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1046-1054.
      Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 893-900. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.893.
      Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.005.
      Cane, J. E., Ferguson, H. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2017). Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 591-610. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000345.
      Davies, C., Lingwood, J., & Arunachalam, S. (2020). Adjective forms and functions in British English child-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 47, 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000242.
      Davies, C., Lingwood, J., Ivanova, B., & Arunachalam, S. (2021). Three-year-olds' comprehension of contrastive and descriptive adjectives: Evidence for contrastive inference. Cognition, 212, 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104707.
      Dink, J., & Ferguson, B. (2018). eyetrackingR (Version 0.1.8). http://www.eyetracking-R.com.
      Falkum, I. L., Recasens, M., & Clark, E. V. (2017). “The moustache sits down first”: On the acquisition of metonymy. Journal of Child Language, 44, 87-119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000720.
      Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.
      Gardner, B., Dix, S., Lawrence, R., Morgan, C., Sullivan, A., & Kurumada, C. (2021). Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability. PLoS One, 16, e0245130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245130.
      Gazdar, G. (1979). A solution to the projection problem. In Presupposition (pp. 57-89). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368880_003.
      Graham, S. A., Stock, H., & Henderson, A. M. (2006). Nineteen-month-olds' understanding of the conventionality of object labels versus desires. Infancy, 9, 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131215.
      Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003.
      Grodner, D., & Sedivy, J. C. (2011). 10 the effect of speaker-specific information on pragmatic inferences. In The processing and acquisition of reference (Vol. 2327, pp. 239-272). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015127.003.0010.
      Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00022-6.
      Heller, D., Grodner, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The role of perspective in identifying domains of reference. Cognition, 108, 831-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.008.
      Henderson, A. M., Graham, S. A., & Schell, V. (2015). 24-month-olds' selective learning is not an all-or-none phenomenon. PLoS One, 10, e0131215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131215.
      Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-83.
      Horn, L. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form and use in context (pp. 11-42). Georgetown University Press.
      Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2013). The use of lexical and referential cues in children's online interpretation of adjectives. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1090-1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029477.
      Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151-171.
      Khu, M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2020). Preschoolers flexibly shift between Speakers' perspectives during real-time language comprehension. Child Development, 91, e619-e634. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13270.
      Kidd, E., & Garcia, R. (2022). How diverse is child language acquisition research? First Language, 42, 703-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723721106640.
      Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76, 1261-1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.x.
      Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
      Lenth, R. V. (2020). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (Version R package version 1.5.3). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
      Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT press.
      Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 372-380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206780.
      Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. CRC Press.
      Mozuraitis, M., Chambers, C. G., & Daneman, M. (2015). Privileged versus shared knowledge about object identity in real-time referential processing. Cognition, 142, 148-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.001.
      Nadig, A. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science, 13, 329-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00460.x.
      Nilsen, E. S., & Graham, S. A. (2009). The relations between children's communicative perspective-taking and executive functioning. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 220-249. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/1179.
      Orena, A. J., & White, K. S. (2015). I forget what that's called! Children's online processing of disfluencies depends on speaker knowledge. Child Development, 86, 1701-1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12421.
      Pouscoulous, N., & Tomasello, M. (2020). Early birds: Metaphor understanding in 3-year-olds. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.021.
      R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
      Ryskin, R., Kurumada, C., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2019). Information integration in modulation of pragmatic inferences during online language comprehension. Cognitive Science, 43, e12769. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12769.
      Schulze, C., Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M. (2013). 3-year-old children make relevance inferences in indirect verbal communication. Child Development, 84, 2079-2093. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12093.
      Scofield, J., & Behrend, D. A. (2008). Learning words from reliable and unreliable speakers. Cognitive Development, 23, 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.01.003.
      Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00025-6.
      Stiller, A. J., Goodman, N. D., & Frank, M. C. (2015). Ad-hoc implicature in preschool children. Language Learning and Development, 11, 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.927328.
      Syrett, K., LaTourrette, A., Ferguson, B., & Waxman, S. R. (2019). Crying helps, but being sad doesn't: Infants constrain nominal reference online using known verbs, but not known adjectives. Cognition, 193, 104033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104033.
      Thacker, J. M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2018a). Five-year-olds' and adults' use of paralinguistic cues to overcome referential uncertainty. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00143.
      Thacker, J. M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2018b). When it is apt to adapt: Flexible reasoning guides children's use of talker identity and disfluency cues. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.11.008.
      Thacker, J. M., Chambers, C. G., & Graham, S. A. (2023). Preschoolers' attention to emotional prosody: Pragmatic adjustment in response to speaker conventionality [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology. University of Calgary.
      Tribushinina, E., & Gillis, S. (2012). The acquisition of scalar structures: Production of adjectives and degree markers by Dutch-speaking children and their caregivers. Linguistics, 50, 241-268.
      Trueswell, J. C. (2008). Using eye movements as a developmental measure within psycholinguistics. In I. A. Sekerina, E. M. Fernández, & H. Clahsen (Eds.), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children's language processing (pp. 73-96). John Benjamins.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20230327 Date Completed: 20231102 Latest Revision: 20231107
    • Publication Date:
      20240628
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/cdev.13925
    • Accession Number:
      36967654