Exploring engagement with a web-based dietary intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: A mixed methods evaluation of the T2Diet study.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2*/therapy; Humans ; Adult ; Life Style ; Diet ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Background: Improved understanding of participant engagement in web-based dietary interventions is needed. Engagement is a complex construct that may be best explored through mixed methods to gain comprehensive insight. To our knowledge, no web-based dietary intervention in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has previously used a mixed methods approach. The aim of this study was to explore factors that may contribute to effective engagement in a web-based dietary program for people with T2D.
Methods: This study employed a mixed methods intervention design, with a convergent design embedded for post-intervention evaluation. The convergent design collected and analyzed quantitative and qualitative data independent of each other, with the two datasets merged/compared during results/interpretation. Quantitative data collected from intervention group participants (n = 40) were self-administered questionnaires and usage data with average values summarized. Qualitative data were participant semi-structured interviews (n = 15) incorporating a deductive-inductive thematic analysis approach.
Results: The results from the quantitative and qualitative data indicated positive overall engagement with the web-based dietary program. Factors that contributed to effective engagement were sustained frequency and intensity of engagement; structured weekly program delivery; participants affective engagement prior to and during the intervention, with positive affective states enhancing cognitive and behavioral engagement; and participants experience of value and reward. In addition, the user-centered development process employed prior to intervention delivery played an important role in facilitating positive engagement outcomes.
Conclusion: This study yielded novel findings by integrating qualitative and quantitative data to explore engagement with a web-based dietary program involving people with T2D. Effective engagement occurred in this intervention through a combination of factors related to usage and participants' affective, cognitive and behavioral states. The engagement outcomes that emerged will be useful to current and future researchers using digital technologies to deliver lifestyle interventions for T2D or other chronic health conditions.
Competing Interests: JD is co-owner of Diabetes Meal Plans, a web-based nutrition support service for people with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, who licensed the web-platform for the study described in this manuscript; and will run the T2Diet Program in future. This does not alter adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
(Copyright: © 2022 Dening et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1901-1902. (PMID: 31438398)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 15;17(1):49. (PMID: 32295650)
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. (PMID: 32369511)
Health Commun. 2016 Dec;31(12):1557-65. (PMID: 27124817)
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S60-S82. (PMID: 34964866)
Internet Interv. 2022 Feb 12;28:100505. (PMID: 35242592)
JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Feb 18;6(1):e24030. (PMID: 33599618)
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 8;18(1):716. (PMID: 29884161)
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 16;20(11):e292. (PMID: 30446482)
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Jun;51(6):719-739. (PMID: 31036500)
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. (PMID: 26613970)
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Feb;59:299-307. (PMID: 26732997)
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):. (PMID: 32466484)
Nutrients. 2020 Apr 10;12(4):. (PMID: 32290076)
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 25;13(1):e9. (PMID: 21371992)
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Jul 01;7(4):1039-56. (PMID: 23911188)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e187. (PMID: 28559223)
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e054594. (PMID: 35190434)
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267. (PMID: 27966189)
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Aug 22;6(2):e14. (PMID: 28829328)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 29;19(6):e232. (PMID: 28663162)
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):1257. (PMID: 30428860)
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 06;13(1):e2. (PMID: 21212045)
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152. (PMID: 23151820)
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Dec 24;6(1):1. (PMID: 33407942)
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2013 Jul;14(3):293-306. (PMID: 23739524)
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e16437. (PMID: 32857059)
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 08;19(11):e360. (PMID: 29117929)
Internet Interv. 2019 Aug 15;18:100265. (PMID: 31890618)
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e11. (PMID: 15829473)
Front Psychol. 2020 May 27;11:926. (PMID: 32536888)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. (PMID: 32046728)
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):833-842. (PMID: 27745683)
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):130-142. (PMID: 28970034)
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Nov;167:104837. (PMID: 36126353)

Date Created: 20221230 Date Completed: 20230103 Latest Revision: 20230113

20230113

PMC9803196

10.1371/journal.pone.0279466

36584072