Dwelling in epistemic disobedience: A reply to Go.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Meghji A;Meghji A
  • Source:
    The British journal of sociology [Br J Sociol] 2023 Jun; Vol. 74 (3), pp. 294-301. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 25.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0373126 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-4446 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00071315 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Br J Sociol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: London : published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science
      Original Publication: London, Published by Routledge & Kegan Paul for London, London School of Economics and Political Science.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      In Thinking Against Empire: Anticolonial Thought as Social Theory, Julian Go continues his vital work on rethinking and redirecting the discipline of sociology. Go's piece relates to his wider oeuvre of postcolonial sociology - found in works such as his Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory (2016) as well as multiple journal articles on epistemic exclusion (Go 2020), Southern theory (Go 2016), metrocentrism (Go 2014), and the history of sociology (Go 2009). In this response article, my aim is to think alongside some of the central themes outlined in Go's paper rather than offering a rebuttal of any sorts. In particular, I want to think through how the recent work on 'decoloniality' may play more of a central role in Go's vision of sociology and social theory than he acknowledges. In doing so, I hope to engage in Go's prodigious scholarship through centering discussions of the geopolitics of knowledge, double translation, and border thinking. Before proceeding to this discussion, I will offer a brief review of my reading of Go's paper.
      (© 2022 The Authors. The British Journal of Sociology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.)
    • References:
      Adésínà, J. O. (2006). Sociology beyond despair: Recovery of nerve, endogeneity, and epistemic intervention. South African Review of Sociology, 37(2), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2006.10419157.
      Akiwowo, A. (1999). Indigenous sociologies: Extending the scope of the argument. International Sociology, 14(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014002001.
      Alatas, S. F. (2000). An introduction to the idea of alternative discourses. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1163/030382400x00136.
      Alatas, S. F. (2010). Religion and reform: Two exemplars for autonomous sociology in the non-western context. In S. Patel (Ed.), The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions (pp. 29-39). SAGE.
      Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. Aunt Lute Books.
      Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Connected sociologies. Bloomsbury.
      Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Polity.
      Cusicanqui, S. R. (2012). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612.
      Darrah-Okike, J. (2020). Theorizing race in Hawai‘i: Centering place, indigeneity, and settler colonialism. Sociology Compass, 14(7), e12791. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12791.
      Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics, pluriversal politics. Duke University Press. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781478012108/html. Accessed 21 July 2021.
      Fúnez-Flores, J. I. (2022). Decolonial and ontological challenges in social and anthropological theory. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(6), 02632764211073011. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764211073011.
      Go, J. (2009). The “new” sociology of empire and colonialism. Sociology Compass, 3(5), 775-788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00232.x.
      Go, J. (2014). Beyond metrocentrism: From empire to globalism in early US sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(2), 178-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X13491647.
      Go, J. (2016a). Globalizing sociology, turning South. Perspectival realism and the southern standpoint. Sociologica, (2), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2383/85279.
      Go, J. (2016b). Postcolonial thought and social theory. Oxford University Press.
      Go, J. (2020). Race, empire, and epistemic exclusion: Or the structures of sociological thought. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926213.
      Grosfoguel, R. (2008). Para descolonizar os estudos de economia política e os estudos pós-coloniais: Transmodernidade, pensamento de fronteira e colonialidade global. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, (80), 115-147. Translated by I.M. Ferreira. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.697.
      Grosfoguel, R. (2013). The structure of knowledge in westernized universities: Epistemic racism/sexism, westernized universities and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long 16th century. Tabula Rasa, (19), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.153.
      Grosfoguel, R. (2017). Decolonizing western universalisms: Decolonial pluri-versalism from aime Cesaire to the Zapatistas. In J. M. Paraskeva (Ed.), Towards a just curriculum theory: The epistemicide (pp. 147-164). Routledge.
      Itzigsohn, J., & Brown, K. L. (2020). The sociology of W. E. B. Du Bois racialized modernity and the global color line. NYU Press.
      Lehmann, D. (2021). After the decolonial: Ethnicity, gender and social justice in Latin America. Polity.
      Marcos, S. (2002). Our word is our weapon: Selected writings. Seven Stories Press.
      Meghji, A. (2020). Decolonizing sociology: An introduction. Polity.
      Meghji, A. (2023). A critical synergy: Race, decoloniality, and world crises. Temple University Press.
      Meyer, M. A. (2008). Indigenous and authentic: Hawaiian epistemology and the triangulation of meaning. In N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln, & L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 217-232). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n11.
      Mignolo, W. (2011). Epistemic disobedience and the decolonial option: A manifesto. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 44-66. https://doi.org/10.5070/t412011807.
      Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local histories/global designs: Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press. Paperback reissue.
      Mignolo, W. D. (2002). The zapatistas’s theoretical revolution: Its historical, ethical, and political consequences. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 25(3), 245-275.
      Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 449-514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.
      Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. (2018). On Decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press.
      Patel, S. (2021). Sociology’s encounter with the decolonial: The problematique of indigenous vs that of coloniality, extraversion and colonial modernity. Current Sociology, 69(3), 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120931143.
      Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
      Virdee, S. (2019). Racialized capitalism: An account of its contested origins and consolidation. The Sociological Review, 67(1), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118820293.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: decoloniality; postcolonialism; social theory
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20221225 Date Completed: 20230607 Latest Revision: 20230607
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/1468-4446.12987
    • Accession Number:
      36566474