Does specialization matter for technical efficiency in beef cattle farming?

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Alhas-Eroglu N;Alhas-Eroglu N
  • Source:
    Tropical animal health and production [Trop Anim Health Prod] 2022 Dec 05; Vol. 55 (1), pp. 1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Dec 05.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 1277355 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-7438 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00494747 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Trop Anim Health Prod Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2005- : Heidelberg : Springer
      Original Publication: Edinburgh, Livingstone.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The objective of this study was to examine the impact of specialization on technical efficiency of beef cattle farms in Samsun province, Turkey. Farm-level cross-sectional data was collected from randomly selected 171 beef cattle farms. Stochastic frontier analysis was used to determine technical efficiency of beef farming and to identify inefficiency determinants. The model results revealed that mean technical efficiency of specialized and combined cattle farms was 0.66 and 0.55, respectively, whereas it was 0.61 on average. Besides, mean technical efficiency of 29.76% of combined cattle farms were lower than 0.50 whereas this rate was solely 5.74% for specialized cattle farms. The results of the study highlighted that specialization increased technical efficiency in beef production. Efficiency model revealed that an increase in use of all inputs except for roughage increases the amount of beef. The higher elasticity of concentrate feed, capital expense and other expense relative to other inputs indicated that these inputs are more effective on beef production. On the other hand, the variable of labor had no significant effect and indicated that beef production was not labor-intensive. The sum of input elasticity was 0.52 and highlighted that cattle farms operated under decreasing return to scale. Inefficiency model revealed that record keeping and herd size reduced the level of inefficiency, whereas non-agricultural income, fodder crop area and external input rate increased. Cattle farms should be encouraged to improve farm size and keep farm record with specialization, and the government should direct a large part of its support to specialized cattle farms to improve beef farming with technical efficiency.
      (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)
    • References:
      Aigner, D.J., Lovell C.A.K. and Schmidt P., 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21--37. (PMID: 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5)
      Alhas-Eroglu, N. and Bozoglu, M., 2019. The effects of livestock supports and external input use on profitability of beef cattle farming: the case of Samsun Province, Turkey, Custos a Agronegócio, 15, 368--383.
      Bahta, S. and Hikuepi, K., 2015. Measuring technical efficiency and technological gaps of beef farmers in three regions of Botswana: An application of Metafrontier Approach. 20th International Farm Management Congress, Québec (Canada), July 12–17. 44--60.
      Bajrami, E., Wailes, E.J., Dixon, B.L., Musliu, A. and Durand-Morat, A., 2017. Factors affecting the technical efficiency of dairy farms in Kosovo, Journal of Central European Agriculture, 18, 823--840. (PMID: 10.5513/JCEA01/18.4.1964)
      Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J., 1995. A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data, Empirical Economics, 20, 325--332. (PMID: 10.1007/BF01205442)
      Ceyhan, V., Hazneci, K., 2010. Economic efficiency of cattle-fattening farms in Amasya Province, Turkey, Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9, 60-69. (PMID: 10.3923/javaa.2010.60.69)
      Coelli, T.J., 1996. A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation. Armidale, Australia. CEPA Working Papers, 7/96.
      Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, C.J., Battese, G.E., 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, (Springer Science+Business Media, Inc, Boston).
      Czyżewski, A. and Smędzik-Ambroży, K. 2015. Specialization and diversification of agricultural production in the light of sustainable development, Journal of International Studies, 8, 63--73. (PMID: 10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-2/6)
      EC, 2021. European Comission, Agriculture- FADN- Type of Farms. https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/detailtf_en.cfm?TF=TF14&Version=13185 . Accessed 15 Nov 2021.
      Featherstone, A.M., Langemeier, M.R. and Ismet, M., 1997. A nonparametric analysis of efficiency for a sample of Kansas beef cow farms, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29, 175--184. (PMID: 10.1017/S1074070800007653)
      Galluzzo, N., 2018. A non-parametric analysis of technical efficiency in Bulgarian farms using the FADN Dataset, European Countryside, 10, 58--73. (PMID: 10.2478/euco-2018-0004)
      Gul, M., Yilmaz, H., Parlakay, O., Akkoyun, S., Bilgili, M.E., Vurarak, Y., Hizli, H. and Kiliçalp, N., 2018. Technical efficiency of dairy cattle farms in East Mediterranean region of Turkey, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 18, 213--225.
      Gunduz, O., 2011. Technical efficiency of dairy cattle farms: a stochastic frontier approach, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Harran University, 15, 11--20.
      Hazneci, E., and Ceyhan, V., 2015. Measuring the productive efficiency and identifying the inefficiency determinants of dairy farms in Amasya Province, Turkey. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 4, 100--107. (PMID: 10.15640/jaes.v4n1a13)
      Hofstrand, D., Livestock production-specializing while retaining income diversification. Iowa, USA. Iowa State University, File B1–76. https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/livestock/pdf/b1-76.pdf , 2008.
      Iraizoz, B., Rapun, M., Zabaleta, I., 2003. Assessing the technical efficiency of horticultural production in Navarra, Spain, Agricultural System, 78, 387--403. (PMID: 10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00039-8)
      Kumar, A., 2012. Technical efficiency in milk production in indo-gangetic plain of India: status and determinants, Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 82, 624--628.
      Latruffe, L., Kelvin Balcombe, K., Davidova, S. and Zawalinska, K., 2004. Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland, Applied Economics, 36, 1255--1263. (PMID: 10.1080/0003684042000176793)
      Latruffe, L., Kelvin Balcombe, K., Davidova, S. and Zawalinska, K., 2005. Technical and scale efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland: does specialization matter? Agricultural Economics, 32, 281--296. (PMID: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00322.x)
      Meeusen, W. and Van den Broeck, J., 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error, International Economic Review, 18, 435--444. (PMID: 10.2307/2525757)
      Mor, S. and Sharma, S., 2012. Technical efficiency and supply chain practices in dairying: the case of India, Agricultural Economics, 58, 85--91.
      Mugera, A.W. and Langemeier, M.R., 2011. Does farm size and specialization matter for productive efficiency? Results from Kansas, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 43, 515--528. (PMID: 10.1017/S1074070800000043)
      Nwigwe, C., Okoruwa, V., Adenegan, K. and Olajide, A., 2016. Technical efficiency of beef cattle production technologies in Nigeria: A stochastic frontier analysis, African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 5152--5161. (PMID: 10.5897/AJAR2016.11744)
      Otieno, D.J., Hubbard, L. and Ruto, E., 2012. Determinants of technical efficiency in beef cattle production in Kenya. In International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil.
      Parlakay, O., Semerci, A. and Celik, A.D., 2015. Estimating technical efficiency of dairy farms in Turkey: a case study of Hatay Province, Custos a Agronegócio, 11, 106--115.
      Rakipova, A.N., Gillespie, J.M. and Franke D.E., 2003. Determinants of technical efficiency in Louisiana beef cattle production. In Journal of American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers (ASFMRA) 99–107, www.asfmra.org .
      TURKSTAT, 2021a. Turkish Statistical Institute, Agricultural Statistics, Agricultural Land. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 . Accessed 12 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2021b. Turkish Statistical Institute, National Accounts, Statistical Tables. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=National-Accounts-113 . Accessed 12 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2021c. Turkish Statistical Institute, Labor Force Statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=istihdam-issizlik-ve-ucret-108&dil=1 . Accessed 14 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2021d. Turkish Statistical Institute, Foreign Trade, Statistical Tables. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=dis-ticaret-104&dil=1 . Accessed 14 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2021e. Turkish Statistical Institute, Foreign Trade, Databases. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=dis-ticaret-104&dil=2 . Accessed 15 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2021f. Turkish Statistical Institute, Agriculture, Statistical Tables. Agricultural Holdings Structure Survey, 2016. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 . Accessed 15 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2021g. Turkish Statistical Institute, Regional Statistics. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bolgeselistatistik/anaSayfa.do?dil=en . Accessed 17 Oct 2021.
      TURKSTAT, 2022. Turkish Statistical Institute, Agriculture, Red Meat Production Statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 . Accessed 25 June 2022.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Cattle; Inefficiency; Specialization; Stochastic production frontier; Technical efficiency; Turkey
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20221205 Date Completed: 20221207 Latest Revision: 20221207
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s11250-022-03416-z
    • Accession Number:
      36469140