Differential Relationships Between Work-Life Interface Constructs and Intention to Stay in or Leave the Profession: Evidence From Midwives in Canada.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: SAGE Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0376475 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1558-691X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00332941 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychol Rep Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2016- : Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE
      Original Publication: Louisville, Ky. : Southern Universities Press,
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      This paper investigates how positive and negative work-personal life interface constructs are differentially associated with intentions to stay in or leave the profession. The findings help map work-personal life interface constructs on the typology of determinants of intention to stay and intention to leave (disengagers, retainers, criticals, and neutrals). The ordered logistic regression (ologit) modelling of cross-sectional data from a representative sample ( n = 601) of midwives in Canada shows that work interference with personal life is a disengager, which has a stronger association with intention to leave than with intention to stay in the profession. Among the work-personal life interface constructs, work enhancement of personal life seems to be the most critical determinant, showing the most substantive association with both intention to stay and intention to leave. This finding suggests that interventions to increase midwives' intention to stay and decrease their intention to leave should focus on amplifying the enhancing effects of working on midwives' personal lives. Interventions that aim to reduce work interference with personal life might be more effective in decreasing intention to leave the profession than increasing intention to stay.
      Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
    • References:
      Midwifery. 2015 Apr;31(4):482-8. (PMID: 25600327)
      Psychol Rep. 1988 Apr;62(2):499-506. (PMID: 3406267)
      J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Jan;42(1):61-71. (PMID: 30420304)
      J Adv Nurs. 2010 Jul;66(7):1422-34. (PMID: 20497270)
      J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Oct;34(10):961-970. (PMID: 23067952)
      Women Birth. 2014 Dec;27(4):266-70. (PMID: 25067794)
      Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):311-8. (PMID: 18723257)
      Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018 Mar;24(1):35-40. (PMID: 27871209)
      J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Dec;50(12):1987-95. (PMID: 12473010)
      J Nurs Manag. 2016 Jan;24(1):70-9. (PMID: 25580519)
      Lancet. 2014 Sep 27;384(9949):1226-35. (PMID: 24965818)
      Health Policy. 2012 Dec;108(2-3):149-57. (PMID: 23017221)
      J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jan;98(1):1-25. (PMID: 23106685)
      J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):E164-74. (PMID: 26122304)
      Midwifery. 2010 Feb;26(1):76-87. (PMID: 18562056)
      J Nurs Manag. 2013 May;21(4):605-13. (PMID: 23406374)
      Women Birth. 2020 Nov;33(6):e549-e557. (PMID: 31980392)
      Women Birth. 2021 Feb;34(1):e92-e96. (PMID: 32593541)
      Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):727-39. (PMID: 17280674)
      Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Apr-Jun;32(2):160-7. (PMID: 17438399)
      J Clin Nurs. 2012 Jan;21(1-2):255-63. (PMID: 21854472)
      Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):450-458. (PMID: 33551204)
      Can Rev Sociol. 2019 May;56(2):178-203. (PMID: 31066216)
      Women Birth. 2019 Dec;32(6):e584-e593. (PMID: 30635229)
      J Adv Nurs. 2014 Dec;70(12):2703-12. (PMID: 25052582)
      ISRN Nurs. 2013 Aug 20;2013:916061. (PMID: 24027640)
      J Occup Health Psychol. 2009 Oct;14(4):441-56. (PMID: 19839663)
      Midwifery. 2013 May;29(5):497-505. (PMID: 23182501)
      J Adv Nurs. 2012 Nov;68(11):2376-86. (PMID: 22489571)
      J Occup Health. 2014;56(4):292-300. (PMID: 24953092)
      J Occup Health Psychol. 2011 Apr;16(2):151-69. (PMID: 21280939)
      J Nurs Manag. 2007 Apr;15(3):248-55. (PMID: 17359424)
      J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jan;29(1-2):208-220. (PMID: 31633845)
      Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;10:3067. (PMID: 32047455)
      J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):864-875. (PMID: 29117451)
      Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:62-9. (PMID: 27428100)
      Hum Resour Health. 2015 May 10;13:29. (PMID: 25957893)
      Women Birth. 2019 Aug;32(4):e441-e449. (PMID: 30341004)
      Sante Publique. 2018 Dec 19;30(5):725-735. (PMID: 30767488)
      Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Dec 17;21:e65. (PMID: 33327974)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: intention to leave; intention to stay; job demands-resources model; salutogenic theory; work-life conflict and enhancement
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20221014 Date Completed: 20240502 Latest Revision: 20240505
    • Publication Date:
      20240505
    • Accession Number:
      PMC11067423
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/00332941221132994
    • Accession Number:
      36240200