Assembling a safe and effective toolbox for integrated flea control and plague mitigation: Fipronil experiments with prairie dogs.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Plague, a widely distributed zoonotic disease of mammalian hosts and flea vectors, poses a significant risk to ecosystems throughout much of Earth. Conservation biologists use insecticides for flea control and plague mitigation. Here, we evaluate the use of an insecticide grain bait, laced with 0.005% fipronil (FIP) by weight, with black-tailed prairie dogs (BTPDs, Cynomys ludovicianus). We consider safety measures, flea control, BTPD body condition, BTPD survival, efficacy of plague mitigation, and the speed of FIP grain application vs. infusing BTPD burrows with insecticide dusts. We also explore conservation implications for endangered black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes), which are specialized predators of Cynomys.
      Principal Findings: During 5- and 10-day laboratory trials in Colorado, USA, 2016-2017, FIP grain had no detectable acute toxic effect on 20 BTPDs that readily consumed the grain. During field experiments in South Dakota, USA, 2016-2020, FIP grain suppressed fleas on BTPDs for at least 12 months and up to 24 months in many cases; short-term flea control on a few sites was poor for unknown reasons. In an area of South Dakota where plague circulation appeared low or absent, FIP grain had no detectable effect, positive or negative, on BTPD survival. Experimental results suggest FIP grain may have improved BTPD body condition (mass:foot) and reproduction (juveniles:adults). During a 2019 plague epizootic in Colorado, BTPDs on 238 ha habitat were protected by FIP grain, whereas BTPDs were nearly eliminated on non-treated habitat. Applications of FIP grain were 2-4 times faster than dusting BTPD burrows.
      Significance: Deltamethrin dust is the most commonly used insecticide for plague mitigation on Cynomys colonies. Fleas on BTPD colonies exhibit the ability to evolve resistance to deltamethrin after repeated annual treatments. Thus, more tools are needed. Accumulating data show orally-delivered FIP is safe and usually effective for flea control with BTPDs, though potential acute toxic effects cannot be ruled out. With continued study and refinement, FIP might be used in rotation with, or even replace deltamethrin, and serve an important role in Cynomys and black-footed ferret conservation. More broadly, our stepwise approach to research on FIP may function as a template or guide for evaluations of insecticides in the context of wildlife conservation.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      J Wildl Dis. 2018 Oct;54(4):745-754. (PMID: 29723100)
      Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jan;22(1):103-18. (PMID: 24938819)
      J Vector Ecol. 2017 Jun;42(1):171-177. (PMID: 28504448)
      Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 28;6:75. (PMID: 30984769)
      Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan;35(1):68-80. (PMID: 31604593)
      Anal Chem. 2019 Jan 15;91(2):1532-1540. (PMID: 30521755)
      J Med Entomol. 2017 Mar 1;54(2):411-417. (PMID: 28122816)
      Integr Zool. 2021 Nov;16(6):820-833. (PMID: 33264458)
      Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:451-73. (PMID: 9017899)
      Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):17-26. (PMID: 20158328)
      Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Jul;22(7):1437-47. (PMID: 12836967)
      PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 5;11(9):e0005887. (PMID: 28873412)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 7;116(19):9155-9163. (PMID: 31061115)
      Med Mal Infect. 2018 Aug;48(5):307-317. (PMID: 29773334)
      Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):27-35. (PMID: 20158329)
      Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):1086-1093. (PMID: 25817984)
      J Med Entomol. 2003 Sep;40(5):718-22. (PMID: 14596288)
      Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019 Jun;19(6):400-406. (PMID: 30620249)
      Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020 Nov 24;13:292-298. (PMID: 33335833)
      J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42(7):955-63. (PMID: 15641641)
      Med Vet Entomol. 2001 Sep;15(3):299-303. (PMID: 11583448)
      Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003;176:1-66. (PMID: 12442503)
      J Vector Ecol. 2019 Jun;44(1):40-47. (PMID: 31124240)
      Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S213-5. (PMID: 14667386)
      J Wildl Dis. 2021 Apr 1;57(2):434-438. (PMID: 33631008)
      Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015 May;15(5):291-302. (PMID: 25988438)
      J Wildl Dis. 2018 Apr;54(2):347-351. (PMID: 29286262)
      J Med Entomol. 2020 May 4;57(3):893-900. (PMID: 31891169)
      J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Oct;48(10):4661-5. (PMID: 11052715)
      J Vector Ecol. 2020 Jun;45(1):82-88. (PMID: 32492281)
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Insecticides)
      0 (Nitriles)
      0 (Pyrazoles)
      0 (Pyrethrins)
      QGH063955F (fipronil)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20220808 Date Completed: 20220810 Latest Revision: 20220830
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      PMC9359584
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0272419
    • Accession Number:
      35939486