Effect of Isomaltulose on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Elsevier Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101540874 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2156-5376 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 21618313 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Adv Nutr Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2023- : [New York, NY] : Elsevier
      Original Publication: Bethesda, MD : American Society for Nutrition
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Evidence regarding the effect of isomaltulose on glycemic and insulinemic responses is still conflicting, which limits isomaltulose's application in glycemic management. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate its effectiveness and evidence quality. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) prior to October 2021. RCTs were eligible for inclusion if they enrolled adults to oral intake of isomaltulose or other carbohydrates dissolved in water after an overnight fast and compared their 2-h postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations. The DerSimonian-Laird method was used to pool the means of the circulating glucose and insulin concentrations. Both random-effects and fixed-effects models were used to calculate the weighted mean difference in postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations in different groups. Subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Finally, 11 RCTs (n = 175 participants) were included. The trials were conducted in 4 countries (Japan, Brazil, Germany, and the Netherlands), and all of the enrolled participants were >18 y of age with various health statuses (healthy, type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, and hypertension). Moderate evidence suggested that oral isomaltulose caused an attenuated glycemic response compared with sucrose at 30 min. Low evidence suggested that oral isomaltulose caused an attenuated but more prolonged glycemic response than sucrose and an attenuated insulinemic response. Low-to-moderate levels of evidence suggest there may be more benefit of isomaltulose for people with type 2 diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, or hypertension; older people; overweight or obese people; and Asian people. The study was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) as CRD42021290396 (available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).
      (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.)
    • References:
      Diabetes. 2017 Sep;66(9):2436-2445. (PMID: 28588099)
      Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 Jan;30(1):39-44. (PMID: 34816598)
      Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 May;139:239-252. (PMID: 29522789)
      Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. (PMID: 31518657)
      Diabetes Care. 2016 Mar;39(3):e38-9. (PMID: 26721819)
      Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1249-51. (PMID: 22492584)
      Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Sep;63(9):1106-14. (PMID: 19471291)
      Clin Biochem Rev. 2005 May;26(2):19-39. (PMID: 16278749)
      Br J Nutr. 2009 Nov;102(10):1408-13. (PMID: 19671200)
      Nutrients. 2020 Jan 03;12(1):. (PMID: 31947853)
      Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 31;7:11089. (PMID: 27029739)
      J Diabetes Investig. 2013 May 6;4(3):281-6. (PMID: 24843667)
      Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jul;9(7):419-426. (PMID: 33989535)
      Horm Metab Res. 1989 Jun;21(6):338-40. (PMID: 2673967)
      Diabet Med. 2010 Oct;27(10):1205-8. (PMID: 20873364)
      Peptides. 2020 Mar;125:170231. (PMID: 31870938)
      Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2010 Sep;61(6):643-51. (PMID: 20367218)
      Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019 Nov;103(21-22):8677-8687. (PMID: 31587089)
      Br J Nutr. 2010 Jun;103(12):1730-7. (PMID: 20211041)
      Lancet. 2014 Jun 7;383(9933):1999-2007. (PMID: 24910231)
      Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021 May;175:108823. (PMID: 33887353)
      Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;4(6):525-36. (PMID: 26876794)
      Pediatrics. 2006 Sep;118(3):1279-86. (PMID: 16951027)
      Br J Nutr. 2012 Oct;108(7):1210-7. (PMID: 22172468)
      Eur J Nutr. 2018 Jun;57(4):1301-1312. (PMID: 29541907)
      Acta Diabetol. 2015 Feb;52(1):11-9. (PMID: 24791963)
      Nutrients. 2017 Sep 06;9(9):. (PMID: 28878197)
      Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jul;100(1):218-32. (PMID: 24787496)
      Endocrinol Jpn. 1985 Dec;32(6):933-6. (PMID: 3914416)
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Apr;76(4):912-7. (PMID: 8473405)
      N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 6;317(6):350-7. (PMID: 3299096)
      Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Aug;6(8):647-658. (PMID: 30017799)
      Am J Clin Nutr. 1981 Mar;34(3):362-6. (PMID: 6259925)
      Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7875):263-267. (PMID: 34408323)
      J Nutr. 2002 Sep;132(9):2574-9. (PMID: 12221211)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: diabetes; glycemic and insulinemic response; isomaltulose; palatinose; systematic review and meta-analysis
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Blood Glucose)
      0 (Insulin)
      059QF0KO0R (Water)
      57-50-1 (Sucrose)
      67I334IX2M (Isomaltose)
      IY9XDZ35W2 (Glucose)
      V59P50X4UY (isomaltulose)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20220520 Date Completed: 20221004 Latest Revision: 20230629
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC9526864
    • Accession Number:
      10.1093/advances/nmac057
    • Accession Number:
      35595510