The right to choose to abort an abortion: should pro-choice advocates support abortion pill reversal?

Publisher: Taylor & Francis Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101627814 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2050-2885 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20502877 NLM ISO Abbreviation: New Bioeth Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: 2016- : Abingdon : Taylor & Francis
Original Publication: Leeds, UK : Maney Publishing, 2013-

Abortion, Induced* ; Women's Rights*; Female ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant Women

Abortion pill reversal (APR) treatment aims to halt an initiated medical abortion, wherein a pregnant woman takes progesterone after having taken the first of the two consecutive abortion pills, typically because she has changed her mind and no longer wants to abort the pregnancy. It is a controversial intervention, generally supported by those identifying as pro-life and opposed by those identifying as pro-choice. This paper examines whether, in principle, those identifying with the pro-choice view should support APR. We firstly examine the commitments of the pro-choice stance. We then briefly outline the evidence supporting the APR. Following this, we discuss potential consequences of APR on women's mental health and its safety. We conclude that those espousing the pro-choice standpoint should be, in principle, committed to supporting the availability of APR, while recognising that data on its efficacy may be difficult to obtain.

Keywords: Abortion – induced; fetus; obstetrics; reproductive medicine; women’s rights

Date Created: 20220518 Date Completed: 20220803 Latest Revision: 20220803

20231215

10.1080/20502877.2022.2073857

35582874