Sex classification using the human sacrum: Geometric morphometrics versus conventional approaches.

Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science

Hominidae* ; Sacrum*; Animals ; Black People ; Discriminant Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Pelvis ; Pregnancy ; Sex Characteristics

The human pelvis shows marked sexual dimorphism that stems from the conflicting selective pressures of bipedal locomotion and parturition. The sacrum is thought to reflect this dimorphism as it makes up a significant portion of the pelvic girdle. However, reported sexual classification accuracies vary considerably depending on the method and reference sample (54%-98%). We aim to explore this inconsistency by quantifying sexual dimorphism and sex classification accuracies in a geographically heterogeneous sample by comparing 3D geometric morphometrics with the more commonly employed linear metric and qualitative assessments. Our sample included 164 modern humans from Africa, Europe, Asia, and America. The geometric morphometric analysis was based on 44 landmarks and 56 semilandmarks. Linear dimensions included sacral width, corpus depth and width, and the corresponding indices. The qualitative inspection relied on traditional macroscopic features such as proportions between the corpus of the first sacral vertebrae and the alae, and sagittal and coronal curvature of the sacrum. Classification accuracy was determined using linear discriminant function analysis for the entire sample and for the largest subsamples (i.e., Europeans and Africans). Male and female sacral shapes extensively overlapped in the geometric morphometric investigation, leading to a classification accuracy of 72%. Anteroposterior corpus depth was the most powerful discriminating linear parameter (83%), followed by the corpus-area index (78%). Qualitative inspection yielded lower accuracies (64-76%). Classification accuracy was higher for the Central European subsample and diminished with increasing geographical heterogeneity of the subgroups. Although the sacrum forms an integral part of the birth canal, our results suggest that its sex-related variation is surprisingly low. Morphological variation thus seems to be driven also by other factors, including body size, and sacrum shape is therefore likely under stronger biomechanical rather than obstetric selection.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002 Feb;117(2):157-68. (PMID: 11815949)
Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2022 Jan-Feb;32(1):64-74. (PMID: 35874189)
J Forensic Sci. 2013 Jan;58 Suppl 1:S126-34. (PMID: 22998360)
Anat Clin. 1983;5(3):169-76. (PMID: 6671062)
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56(1):161-4. (PMID: 20487142)
J Forensic Sci. 2010 Jul;55(4):859-64. (PMID: 20384930)
Oman Med J. 2018 Jan;33(1):22-28. (PMID: 29467995)
J Anthropol Sci. 2012;90:7-31. (PMID: 22781581)
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Oct;96(5):2031-2057. (PMID: 34013651)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 05;112(18):5655-60. (PMID: 25902498)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Apr;174(4):846-858. (PMID: 33410519)
Int J Legal Med. 2014 Sep;128(5):879-88. (PMID: 24928326)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1955 Nov;70(5):1021-5. (PMID: 13258688)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017 Oct;164(2):440-449. (PMID: 28714560)
J Anat Physiol. 1912 Jan;46(Pt 2):184-92. (PMID: 17232919)
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Jan;294:57-68. (PMID: 30453177)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1963 Dec;21(4):443-55. (PMID: 14185525)
J Anat. 2012 Dec;221(6):537-67. (PMID: 22994881)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1957;36(1):42-57. (PMID: 13424209)
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1973 Jul;14(4):417-34. (PMID: 4748171)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016 Apr;159(4):646-54. (PMID: 26714617)
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2018 Sep;34:21-26. (PMID: 30098582)
J Anthropol Sci. 2021 Dec 27;99:117-134. (PMID: 34958307)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Mar;132(3):395-405. (PMID: 17266155)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Nov;80(3):379-89. (PMID: 2589477)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):662.e1-9. (PMID: 24949546)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007 Jul;133(3):967-77. (PMID: 17427928)
J Forensic Sci. 2009 Mar;54(2):249-54. (PMID: 19207288)
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Oct;303:109955. (PMID: 31541936)
J Anat. 1938 Jul;72(Pt 4):633. (PMID: 17104734)
BMC Med Imaging. 2007 Jan 31;7:1. (PMID: 17266746)
Anthropol Anz. 2022 Feb 14;79(2):211-220. (PMID: 34761799)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978 Jul;49(1):103-10. (PMID: 677289)
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Apr 15;207(1-3):127-34. (PMID: 20951517)
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Sep 10;221(1-3):39-43. (PMID: 22521792)
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1953 Jul;66(1):62-6. (PMID: 13057980)
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Oct;179(4):1063-7. (PMID: 12239066)
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Jul 18;179(1):86.e1-6. (PMID: 18554832)
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 17;4(1):347. (PMID: 33731844)
J Hum Evol. 2013 Aug;65(2):209-22. (PMID: 23838060)
J Forensic Sci. 1994 Jul;39(4):1047-56. (PMID: 8064263)
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2020 Nov;173(3):514-534. (PMID: 32864759)
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Nov;60:45-49. (PMID: 30312874)

Date Created: 20220406 Date Completed: 20220414 Latest Revision: 20240826

20250114

PMC8986015

10.1371/journal.pone.0264770

35385483