Factors Impacting Persistence of Phi6 Bacteriophage, an Enveloped Virus Surrogate, on Fomite Surfaces.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Baker CA;Baker CA; Gutierrez A; Gutierrez A; Gibson KE; Gibson KE
  • Source:
    Applied and environmental microbiology [Appl Environ Microbiol] 2022 Apr 12; Vol. 88 (7), pp. e0255221. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 14.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Society for Microbiology Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7605801 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1098-5336 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00992240 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Appl Environ Microbiol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Washington, American Society for Microbiology.
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      The persistence of Phi6 (Φ6) bacteriophage on surfaces commonly encountered in consumer-facing environments was evaluated. Φ6 has been utilized as a surrogate for enveloped viruses, including SARS-CoV-2-the causative agent of COVID-19-due to structural similarities, biosafety level 1 (BSL-1) status, and ease of use. Φ6 persistence on fomites was evaluated by characterizing the impact of the inoculum matrix (artificial saliva, phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], tripartite), inoculum level (low and high), and surface type (nonporous-aluminum, stainless steel, plastic, touchscreen, vinyl; porous-wood). Φ6 was inoculated onto surfaces at low and high inoculum levels for each inoculum matrix and incubated (20.54 ± 0.48°C) for up to 168 h. Φ6 was eluted from the surface and quantified via the double agar overlay assay to determine virus survival over time. For nonporous surfaces inoculated with artificial saliva and PBS, significantly higher D values were observed with high inoculum application according to the 95% confidence intervals. In artificial saliva, D values ranged from 1.00 to 1.35 h at a low inoculum and 4.44 to 7.05 h at a high inoculum across inoculation matrices and surfaces. D values for Φ6, regardless of the inoculum level, were significantly higher in tripartite than in artificial saliva and PBS for nonporous surfaces. In contrast with artificial saliva or PBS, D values in tripartite at low inoculum ( D values ranging from 45.8 to 72.8 h) were greater than those at high inoculum ( D values ranging from 26.4 to 45.5 h) on nonporous surfaces. This study characterized the impact of the inoculum matrix, inoculum level, and surface type on Φ6 survival on various surfaces relevant to fomite transmission in public settings. IMPORTANCE An important consideration in virus contact transmission is the transfer rate between hands and surfaces, which is driven by several factors, including virus persistence on inanimate surfaces. This research characterized Φ6 persistence on surfaces commonly encountered in public settings based on various factors. The inoculum matrix, which simulates the route of transmission, can impact virus persistence, and three separate matrices were evaluated in this study to determine the impact on Φ6 persistence over time. The number of microorganisms has also been suggested to impact persistence, which was evaluated here to simulate real-world contamination scenarios on six surface types. Results from this study will guide future research utilizing Φ6 or other surrogates for enveloped viruses of public health concern.
    • References:
      J Virol Methods. 2003 Sep;112(1-2):3-12. (PMID: 12951207)
      HERD. 2021 Jul;14(3):49-64. (PMID: 33618545)
      Methods Mol Biol. 2009;501:69-76. (PMID: 19066811)
      Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Aug 1;51(15):8692-8700. (PMID: 28657725)
      PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0243505. (PMID: 33290421)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 May 31;84(12):. (PMID: 29625987)
      J Gen Virol. 1977 May;35(2):353-9. (PMID: 874459)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Oct 14;87(21):e0137121. (PMID: 34406830)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Mar;65(3):1186-90. (PMID: 10049881)
      N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567. (PMID: 32182409)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(6):1969-77. (PMID: 22247166)
      PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0177943. (PMID: 28531182)
      mSphere. 2021 Apr 28;6(2):. (PMID: 33910996)
      J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2009 Nov;44(13):1362-6. (PMID: 20183493)
      J Virol Methods. 2022 Jan;299:114307. (PMID: 34606796)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 May 31;84(12):. (PMID: 29625986)
      PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46789. (PMID: 23056454)
      Virol J. 2020 Oct 7;17(1):145. (PMID: 33028356)
      Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):892-893. (PMID: 32628907)
      Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):984. (PMID: 33441775)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jun 25;87(14):e0052621. (PMID: 33962986)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jan;64(1):304-9. (PMID: 9435082)
      ACS Omega. 2021 Mar 05;6(10):6509-6527. (PMID: 33748563)
      J Virol. 1973 May;11(5):799-805. (PMID: 16789137)
      Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Oct 1;41(7):e67-71. (PMID: 16142653)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Aug 18;86(17):. (PMID: 32591388)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jun 11;87(13):e0065321. (PMID: 33931423)
      Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 17;54(6):3581-3590. (PMID: 32073830)
      Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Jul;80(14):4242-50. (PMID: 24795379)
      Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 29;10(1):22419. (PMID: 33376251)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Phi6; SARS-CoV-2; carrier; inoculum matrix; persistence; surrogate
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Saliva, Artificial)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20220314 Date Completed: 20220414 Latest Revision: 20220509
    • Publication Date:
      20240628
    • Accession Number:
      PMC9004354
    • Accession Number:
      10.1128/aem.02552-21
    • Accession Number:
      35285710