How have governments supported citizens stranded abroad due to COVID-19 travel restrictions? A comparative analysis of the financial and health support in eleven countries.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968551 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2334 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712334 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Infect Dis Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
      COVID-19* ; Pandemics*; Government ; Humans ; Internet ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Travel ; United States
    • Abstract:
      Background: In response to the continuing threat of importing novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), many countries have implemented some form of border restriction. A repercussion of these restrictions has been that some travellers have found themselves stranded abroad unable to return to their country of residence, and in need for government support. Our analysis explores the COVID-19-related information and support options provided by 11 countries to their citizens stranded overseas due to travel restrictions. We also examined the quality (i.e., readability, accessibility, and useability) of the information that was available from selected governments' web-based resources.
      Methods: Between June 18 to June 30, 2021, COVID-19-related webpages from 11 countries (Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Canada, United States of America (USA), United Kingdom (UK), France, Spain, Japan, Singapore, and Thailand) were reviewed and content relating to information and support for citizens stuck overseas analysed. Government assistance-related data from each webpage was extracted and coded for the following themes: travel arrangements, health and wellbeing, finance and accommodation, information needs, and sources. Readability was examined using the Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and the Flesch Kincaid readability tests; content 'accessibility' was measured using the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.1; and content 'usability' assessed using the usability heuristics for website design tool.
      Results: Ninety-eight webpages from 34 websites were evaluated. No country assessed covered all themes analysed. Most provided information and some level of support regarding repatriation options; border control and re-entry measures; medical assistance; and traveller registration. Only three countries provided information or support for emergency housing while abroad, and six provided some form of mental health support for their citizens. Our analysis of the quality of COVID-19-related information available on a subset of four countries' websites found poor readability and multiple accessibility and usability issues.
      Conclusion: This study uniquely analyses government support for citizens stuck abroad during the COVID-19 pandemic. With large variance in the information and services available across the countries analysed, our results highlight gaps, inconsistencies, and potential inequities in support available, and raise issues pertinent to the quality, accessibility, and usability of information. This study will assist policymakers plan and communicate comprehensive support packages for citizens stuck abroad due to the COVID-19 situation and design future efforts to prepare for global public health emergencies.
      (© 2022. The Author(s).)
    • References:
      Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):476-80. (PMID: 19189619)
      BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e041619. (PMID: 33837093)
      Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):503-16. (PMID: 22835706)
      BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):296. (PMID: 30223822)
      Comput Human Behav. 2020 Oct;111:106424. (PMID: 32398890)
      BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;21(1):1573. (PMID: 34416860)
      Psychiatry. 2008 Fall;71(3):266-76. (PMID: 18834277)
      J Appl Psychol. 1948 Jun;32(3):221-33. (PMID: 18867058)
      Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr;30(1):84-88. (PMID: 28707643)
      Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Aug;35(4):447-450. (PMID: 32466819)
      Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(12):1127-33. (PMID: 19998267)
      Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):. (PMID: 34360149)
      J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3090-3095. (PMID: 31742125)
      Int J Pharm. 2002 Feb 21;233(1-2):169-77. (PMID: 11897421)
      J Health Commun. 2012;17(9):1003-10. (PMID: 22512714)
      Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 3;10(1):18909. (PMID: 33144595)
      Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. (PMID: 33686204)
      Global Health. 2021 Mar 17;17(1):28. (PMID: 33731178)
      Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Jul;21(7):1217-9. (PMID: 26079313)
      Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Aug;44(4):257-259. (PMID: 32697418)
      J Air Transp Manag. 2021 Jul;94:102062. (PMID: 33875908)
      J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 May;197(5):316-23. (PMID: 19440104)
      J Travel Med. 2020 Dec 23;27(8):. (PMID: 32749458)
      Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 14;50(SI-1):534-543. (PMID: 32283903)
      Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021 Apr;45(2):116-121. (PMID: 33460234)
      Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020 Dec;51:101813. (PMID: 32864326)
      Science. 2020 Apr 24;368(6489):395-400. (PMID: 32144116)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: COVID-19; Communication; Pandemic; Travel
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20220221 Date Completed: 20220222 Latest Revision: 20220224
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC8858437
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12879-022-07155-2
    • Accession Number:
      35184735