[A comparative study of the retroperitoneal cavity established by the modified Hasson in urology].

Publisher: Zhonghua yi xue hui, Wai ke xue hui Country of Publication: China NLM ID: 0153611 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0529-5815 (Print) Linking ISSN: 05295815 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Beijing : Zhonghua yi xue hui, Wai ke xue hui

Laparoscopy* ; Urology*; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Retroperitoneal Space ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Instruments

Objective: To examine the safety and complications of two methods of establishing retroperitoneal cavity in urology. Methods: Totally 83 patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery in Department of Urology, Shanxi Bethune Hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 47 males and 36 females, aged (48.3±11.3) years (range: 35 to 71 years). Forty-three cases in Hasson group(the first Trocar channel was selected at the junction of the 12 ^th rib and the posterior axillary line or lumbar triangle), 40 cases in modified Hasson group(the first Trocar channel is selected at 1.5 cm above the iliac crest on the mid-axillary line). The t test, χ² test, and Fisher exact test were used to compare the surgical safety indicators and complications of the two groups of patients. Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, waist length, and height ( P >0.05). The comparison of safety indicators, included the time from skin incision to establishment of the retroperitoneal cavity and the amount of bleeding from the cavity were statistical difference between the two groups ( P <0.05). Compared to that in Hasson group, the time from skin incision to establishment of the abdominal cavity in modified Hasson group was shorter ((8.56±2.64) minutes vs. (5.32±1.36) minutes, t =6.949, P <0.01), the blood loss of establishment was less ((15.32±6.09) ml vs. (9.85±3.55) ml, t =4.951, P< 0.01). In terms of complication indicators, the incidence of Trocar hernia and the number of subcutaneous emphysema in modified Hasson group were lower than that in Hasson group (20.9% (9/43) vs. 2.5% (1/40), P =0.015, 18.6% (8/43) vs. 2.5% (1/40), P =0.030). Conclusions: The modified Hasson group is a safe method of establishing retroperitoneal cavity. The technique is simple and fast. It provides urologists with a more effective and easy-to-implement option with fewer complications.

Local Abstract: [Publisher, Chinese] 目的： 探讨泌尿外科后腹腔镜手术中两种建立后腹腔方法的安全性和并发症。 方法： 回顾性分析山西白求恩医院泌尿外科2020年1月至2021年6月收治的83例接受后腹腔镜手术患者的病例资料。男性47例，女性36例，年龄（48.3±11.3）岁（范围：35~71岁）。43例采用Hasson方法建立后腹腔（Hasson组，第1通道选择在第12肋与腋后线交界处或腰三角处），40例采用改良Hasson方法建立后腹腔（改良Hasson组，第1通道选择在腋中线上髂嵴上1.5 cm处）。采用 t 检验、χ²检验、Fisher确切概率法比较两组患者手术安全性指标及并发症。 结果： 两组患者的性别、年龄、体重指数、腰长、身高差异均无统计学意义（ P >0.05）。与Hasson组相比，改良Hasson组从切皮到建立后腹腔时间更短［（8.56±2.64）min比（5.32±1.36）min， t =6.949， P <0.01］，建腔出血量更少［（15.32±6.09）ml比（9.85±3.55）ml， t =4.951， P <0.01］。改良Hasson组的套管切口疝、皮下气肿发生率低于Hasson组［20.9%（9/43）比2.5%（1/40）， P =0.015；18.6%（8/43）比2.5%（1/40）， P =0.030］。 结论： 改良Hasson法建立后腹腔，技术简单、快速、可行，为泌尿外科医师提供了一种有效和便利的选择。.

Date Created: 20211107 Date Completed: 20211109 Latest Revision: 20211109

20231215

10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210706-00293

34743452