Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Association Between Brain Substructure Dose and Cognitive Outcomes in Children With Medulloblastoma Treated on SJMB03: A Step Toward Substructure-Informed Planning.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8309333 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1527-7755 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0732183X NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Clin Oncol Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Publication: 2003- : Alexandria, VA : American Society of Clinical Oncology
Original Publication: New York, N.Y. : Grune & Stratton, c1983-
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Purpose: To characterize the association between neurocognitive outcomes (memory and processing speed) and radiation (RT) dose to the hippocampus, corpus callosum (CC), and frontal white matter (WM) in children with medulloblastoma treated on a prospective study, SJMB03.
Patients and Methods: Patients age 3-21 years with medulloblastoma were treated at a single institution on a phase III study. The craniospinal RT dose was 23.4 Gy for average-risk patients and 36-39.6 Gy for high-risk patients. The boost dose was 55.8 Gy to the tumor bed. Patients underwent cognitive testing at baseline and once yearly for 5 years. Performance on tests of memory (associative memory and working memory) and processing speed (composite processing speed and perceptual speed) was analyzed. Mixed-effects models were used to estimate longitudinal trends in neurocognitive outcomes. Reliable change index and logistic regression were used to define clinically meaningful neurocognitive decline and identify variables associated with decline.
Results: One hundred and twenty-four patients were eligible for inclusion, with a median neurocognitive follow-up of 5 years. Mean right and left hippocampal doses were significantly associated with decline in associative memory in patients without posterior fossa syndrome (all P < .05). Mean CC and frontal WM doses were significantly associated with decline in both measures of processing speed (all P < .05). Median brain substructure dose-volume histograms were shifted to the right for patients with a decline in associative memory or processing speed. The odds of decline in associative memory and composite processing speed increased by 23%-26% and by 10%-15% for every 1-Gy increase in mean hippocampal dose and mean CC or frontal WM dose, respectively.
Conclusion: Increasing RT dose to the CC or frontal WM and hippocampus is associated with worse performance on tests of processing speed and associative memory, respectively. Brain substructure-informed RT planning may mitigate neurocognitive impairment.
Competing Interests: Lydia WilsonHonoraria: Elekta Amar GajjarConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, QED Therapeutics, Day One TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), Kazia Therapeutics (Inst) Thomas E. MerchantHonoraria: Varian Medical SystemsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Philips HealthcareNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.
- References:
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Sep;14(9):1185-93. (PMID: 22898373)
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Oct 01;19(10):1408-1418. (PMID: 28541578)
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 20;39(24):2685-2697. (PMID: 34110925)
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2762-2769. (PMID: 30091946)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 30;110(31):12822-7. (PMID: 23858442)
Source Code Biol Med. 2008 Oct 21;3:15. (PMID: 18939983)
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jan;22(1):158-62. (PMID: 11158902)
Nat Med. 1998 Nov;4(11):1313-7. (PMID: 9809557)
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Aug;16(8):1129-36. (PMID: 24497405)
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Jul;32(7):1195-203. (PMID: 27142103)
Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 1;69(3):1190-8. (PMID: 19155304)
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 May;11(5):339-50. (PMID: 20354534)
Cancer Res. 2003 Jul 15;63(14):4021-7. (PMID: 12874001)
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):350-351. (PMID: 33560406)
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5511-9. (PMID: 16110011)
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Sep 6;21(9):1175-1183. (PMID: 30977510)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9. (PMID: 2002127)
Brain Pathol. 2017 Jul;27(4):419-436. (PMID: 27411167)
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4134-40. (PMID: 23071220)
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Feb 14;5(1):11. (PMID: 30765705)
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Sep;14 Suppl 4:iv25-36. (PMID: 23095827)
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1234-1242. (PMID: 29908790)
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:115-42. (PMID: 25251486)
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3494-500. (PMID: 23980078)
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 May;27(3):248-61. (PMID: 22382384)
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):822-835. (PMID: 33405951)
Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Apr 5;22(4):589-599.e5. (PMID: 29625071)
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jul;17(7):2127-36. (PMID: 10561268)
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1019-1029. (PMID: 32058845)
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec 23;8:293. (PMID: 24365155)
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474. (PMID: 29539639)
Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Mar;27(3):355-63. (PMID: 21061011)
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Sep 1;93(1):64-71. (PMID: 26279025)
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57768. (PMID: 23469234)
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):554-61. (PMID: 25160611)
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):1677-1685. (PMID: 32227185)
Ann Neurol. 2007 Nov;62(5):515-20. (PMID: 17786983)
Nat Med. 2002 Sep;8(9):955-62. (PMID: 12161748)
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105(6 Suppl):444-51. (PMID: 17184075)
- Grant Information:
P30 CA021765 United States CA NCI NIH HHS
- Molecular Sequence:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00085202
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20211029 Date Completed: 20220221 Latest Revision: 20240923
- Publication Date:
20240923
- Accession Number:
PMC8683226
- Accession Number:
10.1200/JCO.21.01480
- Accession Number:
34714708
No Comments.