Cultural differences in stress and affection following social support receipt.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Culturally appropriate social support predicts better psychological outcomes. Motivation for providing social support may vary cross-culturally, with more independent cultures valuing self-esteem and more interdependent cultures valuing closeness. Participants in the U.S. (N = 85) and Singapore (N = 78) reported on emotions and social support receipt using the Day Reconstruction Method. We examined cultural differences in stress and affection, and tested country as a moderator of the associations between both social support receipt and social support motivation, and next-episode emotions. Multilevel modeling analyses showed that not only did the emotional correlates of social support receipt vary by country, but that recipient perceptions of esteem-building and closeness-fostering SS also differentially correlated with subsequent emotion. For example, esteem-building SS predicted greater next-episode stress for Singaporean participants, but less stress in the U.S. Esteem-building SS predicted more next-episode affection only in the U.S. Culturally appropriate social support predicts positive psychological outcomes. This research highlights the importance of considering culture when examining the dynamic emotional correlates of social support receipt.
      Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
    • References:
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):354-62. (PMID: 15382985)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):890-903. (PMID: 17059308)
      Psychol Bull. 2002 Nov;128(6):934-60. (PMID: 12405138)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul;111(1):67-82. (PMID: 26524003)
      Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57. (PMID: 3901065)
      Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Dec;32(12):1595-607. (PMID: 17122173)
      Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jul;43(7):940-956. (PMID: 28903707)
      J Health Soc Behav. 1995;Spec No:53-79. (PMID: 7560850)
      Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1776-80. (PMID: 15576620)
      PLoS One. 2019 Jul 12;14(7):e0219478. (PMID: 31299054)
      Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):928-32. (PMID: 19549083)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):824-38. (PMID: 18444741)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Nov;63(5):857-67. (PMID: 1447698)
      Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):3-13. (PMID: 22214884)
      Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;18(9):831-7. (PMID: 17760781)
      Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Feb;30(2):134-48. (PMID: 15030629)
      Am Psychol. 2008 Sep;63(6):518-26. (PMID: 18793039)
      Psychol Sci. 2018 Aug;29(8):1283-1290. (PMID: 29553880)
      Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2006 Jan;12(1):134-48. (PMID: 16594860)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Apr;68(4):653-63. (PMID: 7738768)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;98(6):904-16. (PMID: 20515246)
      Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:15-18. (PMID: 28813286)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210909 Date Completed: 20211117 Latest Revision: 20211117
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC8428676
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0256859
    • Accession Number:
      34499676