Characteristics of the sagittal spinal balance in the asymptomatic elderly Chinese population.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Song J;Song J; Pan F; Pan F; Zhu W; Zhu W; Kong C; Kong C; Lu S; Lu S
  • Source:
    European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society [Eur Spine J] 2022 Feb; Vol. 31 (2), pp. 233-240. Date of Electronic Publication: 2021 Aug 31.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Springer-Verlag Country of Publication: Germany NLM ID: 9301980 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1432-0932 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09406719 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Eur Spine J Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany : Springer-Verlag, c1992-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Purpose: To investigate the normal values of the sagittal spinal parameters and analyze the distribution of the global spinal profiles in a Chinese population with age over 75.
      Methods: Two hundred and twelve sets of the whole spine lateral radiographs were obtained from a database of an asymptomatic elderly population. Global and regional spinal parameters were measured. Sagittal profiles were determined according to the Roussouly classification compared with previous studies involving different populations.
      Results: A total of 102 elderly subjects (≥ 75 years) were enrolled with an average age of 79.24 ± 3.53 years. The mean values of the spinopelvic parameters were 42.89 ± 11.64° for TK, 13.84 ± 10.78° for TLK, 44.48 ± 12.88° for LL, 44.76 ± 9.84° for PI, 17.19 ± 8.08° for PT, 28.35 ± 7.94° for SS, 3.47 ± 3.56 cm for SVA, 14.75 ± 7.85° for TPA, -0.27 ± 11.95° for PI-LL, respectively. Subjects ≥ 75 years were found to have significantly smaller LL and SS, but greater TLK, PT, SVA, TPA, and PI-LL than those 60-74 years (p < 0.05). Significant age- and sex-dependent differences were found in the Roussouly classification's distribution between the two subgroups.
      Conclusions: The normal values of the sagittal parameters were presented in the elderly Chinese asymptomatic population (≥ 75 years). Ethnic, age, and sex displayed significant effects on the behaviors of the sagittal spinal balance and profiles. These results could be served as physiological references for the planning of surgical strategies in elderly Chinese patients over 75 years.
      (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
    • References:
      Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Watanabe K, Ohashi M, Vital JM, Dubousset J (2020) Compensation for standing posture by whole-body sagittal alignment in relation to health-related quality of life. Bone Jt J 102-B:1359–1367. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.102b10.bjj-2019-1581.r2. (PMID: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b10.bjj-2019-1581.r2)
      Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine 38:E803–E812. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b923722572)
      Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96. (PMID: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.9616166889)
      Yang X, Kong Q, Song Y, Liu L, Zeng J, Xing R (2014) The characteristics of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar disc degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 23:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3067-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-013-3067-z)
      Boody BS, Rosenthal BD, Jenkins TJ, Patel AA, Savage JW, Hsu WK (2017) Iatrogenic flatback and flatback syndrome: evaluation, management, and prevention. Clin Spine Surg 30:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000522. (PMID: 10.1097/bsd.000000000000052228266956)
      Yokoyama K, Tanaka H, Ito Y, Yamada M, Sugie A, Wanibuchi M, Kawanishi M (2021) Analgesic posture and pelvic morphology in patients with lumbar disc herniation. World neurosurg 147:e411–e415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.074. (PMID: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.07433359525)
      Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Silvestre C, Kharrat K, Bari TJ, Kreichati G, Rizkallah M, Roussouly P (2020) Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 29:904–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06253-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-019-06253-1)
      Sebaaly A, Riouallon G, Obeid I, Grobost P, Rizkallah M, Laouissat F, Charles YP, Roussouly P (2018) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult scoliosis: comparison of four radiological predictor models. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 27:613–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5172-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-017-5172-x)
      Pizones J, Moreno-Manzanaro L, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ, Vila-Casademunt A, Yilgor C, Obeid I, Alanay A, Kleinstück F, Acaroglu ER, Pellisé F (2020) Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 29:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06176-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-019-06176-x)
      Diebo BG, Henry J, Lafage V, Berjano P (2015) Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 24(Suppl 1):S3-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3653-8. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-014-3653-8)
      Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Yoshida M (2018) Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 27:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4807-7. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-016-4807-7)
      Bassani T, Galbusera F, Luca A, Lovi A, Gallazzi E, Brayda-Bruno M (2019) Physiological variations in the sagittal spine alignment in an asymptomatic elderly population. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc 19:1840–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.016. (PMID: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.016)
      Iyer S, Lenke LG, Nemani VM, Albert TJ, Sides BA, Metz LN, Cunningham ME, Kim HJ (2016) Variations in sagittal alignment parameters based on age: a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteers using full-body radiographs. Spine 41:1826–1836. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001642. (PMID: 10.1097/brs.000000000000164227111763)
      Attiah M, Gaonkar B, Alkhalid Y, Villaroman D, Medina R, Ahn C, Niu T, Beckett J, Ames C, Macyszyn L (2019) Natural history of the aging spine: a cross-sectional analysis of spinopelvic parameters in the asymptomatic population. J Neurosurg Spine. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.7.spine181164. (PMID: 10.3171/2019.7.spine18116431561232)
      Arima H, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Yamato Y, Matsuyama Y, Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Cook B, Carreon LY (2018) Differences in lumbar and pelvic parameters among African American, Caucasian and Asian populations. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 27:2990–2998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5743-5. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-018-5743-5)
      Zhu Z, Xu L, Zhu F, Jiang L, Wang Z, Liu Z, Qian BP, Qiu Y (2014) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations. Spine 39:E1-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000022. (PMID: 10.1097/brs.000000000000002224270931)
      Zeng Z, Hai Y, Bi Y, Wang B, Liu M, Liu Y (2018) Characteristics of sagittal spinopelvic alignment in asymptomatic Han Chinese adults. Exp Ther Med 16:4107–4113. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6680. (PMID: 10.3892/etm.2018.6680303446866176135)
      Vira S, Diebo BG, Spiegel MA, Liabaud B, Henry JK, Oren JH, Lafage R, Tanzi EM, Protopsaltis TS, Errico TJ, Schwab FJ, Lafage V (2016) Is There a gender-specific full body sagittal profile for different spinopelvic relationships? a study on propensity-matched cohorts. Spine Deform 4:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.08.004. (PMID: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.08.00427927541)
      Zhou S, Xu F, Wang W, Zou D, Sun Z, Li W (2020) Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 29:396–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06178-9. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-019-06178-9)
      Hu P, Yu M, Sun Z, Li W, Jiang L, Wei F, Liu X, Chen Z, Liu Z (2016) Analysis of global sagittal postural patterns in asymptomatic chinese adults. Asian Spine J 10:282–288. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.282. (PMID: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.282271147694843065)
      Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353. (PMID: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65)
      Lee CS, Chung SS, Kang KC, Park SJ, Shin SK (2011) Normal patterns of sagittal alignment of the spine in young adults radiological analysis in a Korean population. Spine 36:E1648-1654. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216b0fd. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318216b0fd21394071)
      Cho Y (2017) Evaluation of global sagittal balance in Koreans Adults. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60:560–566. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.1212.002. (PMID: 10.3340/jkns.2016.1212.002288811195594629)
      Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Roussouly P (2018) Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 27:2002–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x)
      Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A (2019) Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 28:1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1)
      Hu Z, Man GCW, Yeung KH, Cheung WH, Chu WCW, Law SW, Lam TP, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Cheng JCY (2020) 2020 young investigator award winner: age and sex-related normative value of whole-body sagittal alignment based on 584 asymptomatic chinese adult population from age 20 to 89. Spine 45:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003187. (PMID: 10.1097/brs.000000000000318731899690)
      Cauley JA (2015) Estrogen and bone health in men and women. Steroids 99:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2014.12.010. (PMID: 10.1016/j.steroids.2014.12.01025555470)
      Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Kim HJ, Ames C, Scheer J, Klineberg E, Bess S, Burton D, Lafage V (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine 41:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001171. (PMID: 10.1097/brs.000000000000117126689395)
      Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K (2016) Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25:3675–3686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2)
      Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D’Acunzi G, Perrin G (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 22(Suppl 6):S834-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z)
      Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV, Baikousis AG (1998) Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population. Spine 23:700–704. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199803150-00010. (PMID: 10.1097/00007632-199803150-000109549792)
      Mannion AF, Käser L, Weber E, Rhyner A, Dvorak J, Müntener M (2000) Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fibre type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 9:273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000189. (PMID: 10.1007/s005860000189)
      Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? an overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 35:2224–2231. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd4. (PMID: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ee6bd421102297)
      Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Ryan DJ, Hostin R, Hart R, Burton D, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bess S, Errico T, Lafage V (2014) TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1631–1640. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.m.01459. (PMID: 10.2106/jbjs.m.0145925274788)
      Banno T, Hasegawa T, Yamato Y, Kobayashi S, Togawa D, Oe S, Mihara Y, Matsuyama Y (2016) T1 pelvic angle is a useful parameter for postoperative evaluation in adult spinal deformity patients. Spine 41:1641–1648. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001608. (PMID: 10.1097/brs.000000000000160827802254)
      Zárate-Kalfópulos B, Reyes-Tarrago F, Navarro-Aceves LA, García-Ramos CL, Reyes-Sánchez AA, Alpízar-Aguirre A, Rosales-Olivarez LM (2019) Characteristics of spinopelvic sagittal alignment in lumbar degenerative disease. World Neurosurg 126:e417–e421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.067. (PMID: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.06730822583)
      Sebaaly A, Grobost P, Mallam L, Roussouly P (2018) Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 27:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0. (PMID: 10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Asymptomatic; Elderly population; Normative value; Roussouly classification; Sagittal alignment
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210831 Date Completed: 20220406 Latest Revision: 20221207
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s00586-021-06979-x
    • Accession Number:
      34463863