Prevalence and impact of HLA and MICA allele mismatching on donor-specific antibodies induction in kidney transplant rejection.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Science Country of Publication: Australia NLM ID: 9615568 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1440-1797 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13205358 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Nephrology (Carlton) Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Carlton, Vic., Australia : Blackwell Science,
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Aim: Donor-recipient antigen mismatching for anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) and MICA is one of the risk factors for antibody induction leading to graft rejection. Our aim was to analyze the incidence and specificity of the different DSAs developing and to investigate the impact of HLA and MICA allele mismatches on antibody production in kidney transplant patients experiencing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).
      Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 253 consecutive recipients of kidney transplant who were diagnosed as experiencing AMR.
      Results: Our results showed that around 27% of our patients were positive for DSAs over a median follow-up period of 24 months. Antibody to HLA-DQ7 was the most prevalent DSA detected. The allele mismatch number was significantly lower for DQ loci than -A and -B loci (DQ vs. A, p < .001; DQ vs. B, p = .002). Considering each HLA antigen, the incidence rate of DQ-DSA [41.9 (32.92-51.46; 95%CI)] was much higher than the rate observed for DSA directed to -A, -DR and -B loci. Half of the recipients in the DQ-DSA-only group, and the DQ-DSA together with non-DQ group, had MFI > 5000. Only one case developed de novo MICA-DSA (MICA002).
      Conclusion: Our study indicates that mismatching for HLA and MICA alleles leads to the development of HLA and MICA antibodies in some kidney transplant recipients. We have also demonstrated that DSA to the DQ locus is the most prevalent in kidney transplant patients with AMR. Thus, matching the DQ locus in kidney allocation algorithms may reduce post-transplant development of DSA.
      (© 2021 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)
    • References:
      Amore A. Antibody-mediated rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2015;20(5):536-542.
      Cox ST, Stephens HA, Fernando R, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain a allele mismatching, antibodies, and rejection in renal transplantation. Hum Immunol. 2011;72(10):827-834.
      Zou Y, Stastny P, Süsal C, Döhler B, Opelz G. Antibodies against MICA antigens and kidney-transplant rejection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(13):1293-1300.
      Lim WH, Chapman JR, Coates PT, et al. HLA-DQ mismatches and rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(5):875-883.
      Tagliamacco A, Cioni M, Comoli P, et al. DQ molecules are the principal stimulators of de novo donor-specific antibodies in nonsensitized pediatric recipients receiving a first kidney transplant. Transpl Int. 2014;27(7):667-673.
      Willicombe M, Brookes P, Sergeant R, et al. De novo DQ donor-specific antibodies are associated with a significant risk of antibody-mediated rejection and transplant glomerulopathy. Transplantation. 2012;94(2):172-177.
      DeVos JM, Gaber AO, Knight RJ, et al. Donor-specific HLA-DQ antibodies may contribute to poor graft outcome after renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 2012;82(5):598-604.
      Everly MJ, Rebellato LM, Haisch CE, et al. Incidence and impact of de novo donor-specific alloantibody in primary renal allografts. Transplantation. 2013;95(3):410-417.
      Haas M, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, et al. The Banff 2017 kidney meeting report: revised diagnostic criteria for chronic active T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and prospects for integrative endpoints for next-generation clinical trials. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(2):293-307.
      Romphruk AV, Romphruk A, Kongmaroeng C, Klumkrathok K, Paupairoj C, Leelayuwat C. HLA class I and II alleles and haplotypes in ethnic northeast Thais. Tissue Antigens. 2010;75(6):701-711.
      Romphruk AV, Naruse TK, Romphruk A, et al. Diversity of MICA (PERB11.1) and HLA haplotypes in northeastern Thais. Tissue Antigens. 2001;58(2):83-89.
      Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(2):388-399.
      Halloran PF, Reeve JP, Pereira AB, Hidalgo LG, Famulski KS. Antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejection, and the injury-repair response: new insights from the Genome Canada studies of kidney transplant biopsies. Kidney Int. 2014;85(2):258-264.
      Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(6):665-673.
      Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, et al. Rates and determinants of progression to graft failure in kidney allograft recipients with de novo donor-specific antibody. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(11):2921-2930.
      Theruvath TP, Saidman SL, Mauiyyedi S, et al. Control of antidonor antibody production with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with chronic rejection. Transplantation. 2001;72(1):77-83.
      Womer KL, Stone JR, Murphy B, Chandraker A, Sayegh MH. Indirect allorecognition of donor class I and II major histocompatibility complex peptides promotes the development of transplant vasculopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12(11):2500-2506.
      Heeger PS. T-cell allorecognition and transplant rejection: a summary and update. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(5):525-533.
      Lee H, Min JW, Kim JI, et al. Clinical significance of HLA-DQ antibodies in the development of chronic antibody-mediated rejection and allograft failure in kidney transplant recipients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(11):e3094.
      Sasaki N, Idica A. The HLA-matching effect in different cohorts of kidney transplant recipients: 10 years later. Clin Transpl. 2010;261-282.
      Freitas MC, Rebellato LM, Ozawa M, et al. The role of immunoglobulin-G subclasses and C1q in de novo HLA-DQ donor-specific antibody kidney transplantation outcomes. Transplantation. 2013;95(9):1113-1119.
      Cross AR, Lion J, Poussin K, et al. HLA-DQ alloantibodies directly activate the endothelium and compromise differentiation of FoxP3high regulatory T lymphocytes. Kidney Int. 2019;96(3):689-698.
      Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, et al. Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(5):1157-1167.
      Deng CT, El-Awar N, Ozawa M, Cai J, Lachmann N, Terasaki PI. Human leukocyte antigen class II DQ alpha and beta epitopes identified from sera of kidney allograft recipients. Transplantation. 2008;86(3):452-459.
      Schawalder L, Hönger G, Kleiser M, et al. Development of an immunogenicity score for HLA-DQ eplets: a conceptual study. HLA. 2020;97:30-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/tan.14110.
      Snanoudj R, Kamar N, Cassuto E, et al. Epitope load identifies kidney transplant recipients at risk of allosensitization following minimization of immunosuppression. Kidney Int. 2019;95(6):1471-1485.
      McCaughan JA, Battle RK, Singh SKS, et al. Identification of risk epitope mismatches associated with de novo donor-specific HLA antibody development in cardiothoracic transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(12):2924-2933.
      Leeaphorn N, Pena JRA, Thamcharoen N, Khankin EV, Pavlakis M, Cardarelli F. HLA-DQ mismatching and kidney transplant outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(5):763-771.
      Everly MJ, Everly JJ, Arend LJ, et al. Reducing de novo donor-specific antibody levels during acute rejection diminishes renal allograft loss. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(5):1063-1071.
    • Grant Information:
      IN61314 This work was supported by the Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: HLA-mismatching; MICA-mismatching; antibody-mediated rejection; donor-specific antibodies; kidney transplantation
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Biomarkers)
      0 (HLA Antigens)
      0 (Histocompatibility Antigens Class I)
      0 (Isoantibodies)
      0 (MHC class I-related chain A)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210701 Date Completed: 20220119 Latest Revision: 20220119
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/nep.13921
    • Accession Number:
      34197005