Chronic polytherapy after myocardial infarction: the trade-off between hospital and community-based providers in determining adherence to medication.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968539 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2261 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712261 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: The benefits of chronic polytherapy in reducing readmissions and death after myocardial infarction (MI) have been clearly shown. However, real-world evidence shows poor medication adherence and large geographic variation, suggesting critical issues in access to optimal care. Our objectives were to measure adherence to polytherapy, to compare the amount of variation attributable to hospitals of discharge and to community-based providers, and to identify determinants of adherence to medications.
      Methods: This is a population-based study. Data were obtained from the information systems of the Lazio and Tuscany Regions, Italy (9.5 million inhabitants). Patients hospitalized with incident MI in 2010-2014 were analyzed. The outcome measure was medication adherence, defined as a Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) ≥ 0.75 for at least 3 of the following drugs: antiplatelets, β-blockers, ACEI/ARBs, statins. A 2-year cohort-study was performed. Cross-classified multilevel models were applied to analyze geographic variation. The variance components attributable to hospitals of discharge and community-based providers were expressed as Median Odds Ratio (MOR).
      Results: A total of 32,962 patients were enrolled. About 63% of patients in the Lazio cohort and 59% of the Tuscan cohort were adherent to chronic polytherapy. Women and patients aged 85 years and over were most at risk of non-adherence. In both regions, adherence was higher for patients discharged from cardiology wards (Lazio: OR = 1.58, p < 0.001, Tuscany: OR = 1.59, p < 0.001) and for patients with a percutaneous coronary intervention during the index admission. Relevant variation between community-based providers was observed, though when the hospital of discharge was included as a cross-classified level, in both Lazio and Tuscany regions the variation attributable to hospitals of discharge was the only significant component (Lazio: MOR = 1.30, p = 0.001; Tuscany: MOR = 1.31, p = 0.001).
      Conclusion: Adherence to best practice treatments after MI is not consistent with clinical guidelines, and varies between patient groups as well as within and between regions. The variation attributable to providers is affected by the hospital of discharge, up to two years from the acute episode. This variation is likely to be attributable to hospital discharge processes, and could be reduced through appropriate policy levers.
    • References:
      Med Care. 2014 Mar;52 Suppl 3:S37-44. (PMID: 24561757)
      Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Jan;110(1):7-9. (PMID: 30720011)
      BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 10;5(6):e007866. (PMID: 26063569)
      Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 23;167(8):847-52. (PMID: 17452550)
      Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Sep;44(9):1410-21. (PMID: 20702755)
      Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jul;26(4):187-192. (PMID: 31338165)
      COPD. 2017 Feb;14(1):86-94. (PMID: 27419396)
      Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(3):145-9. (PMID: 17356927)
      Eur Heart J. 2006 May;27(10):1153-8. (PMID: 16399775)
      Syst Rev. 2019 May 10;8(1):112. (PMID: 31077247)
      Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):649-57. (PMID: 23529919)
      Circulation. 2011 Nov 29;124(22):2458-73. (PMID: 22052934)
      Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1108-15. (PMID: 18035083)
      Aging Med (Milton). 2018 Dec;1(3):254-266. (PMID: 31410389)
      Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jan 1;161(1):81-8. (PMID: 15615918)
      JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):627-33. (PMID: 10029124)
      Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Sep 14;9:1303-14. (PMID: 26396502)
      JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):147-55. (PMID: 27437885)
      Circulation. 2004 Feb 17;109(6):745-9. (PMID: 14970110)
      Int J Integr Care. 2016 May 24;16(2):9. (PMID: 29042842)
      J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Feb;37(1):37-44. (PMID: 21294760)
      BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 04;6(4):e010926. (PMID: 27044584)
      Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259. (PMID: 22696318)
      BMJ. 2009 Jan 26;338:b36. (PMID: 19171564)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 07;13:393. (PMID: 24099264)
      Circulation. 2006 Jan 17;113(2):203-12. (PMID: 16401776)
      Mayo Clin Proc. 2011 Apr;86(4):304-14. (PMID: 21389250)
    • Grant Information:
      GR-2011-02350559 Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Ministero della Salute Dipartimento di Epidemiologia
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Adherence to chronic poly-therapy; Community-based healthcare providers; Geographic variation; Hospital of discharge; Myocardial infarction
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Adrenergic beta-Antagonists)
      0 (Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists)
      0 (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors)
      0 (Cardiovascular Agents)
      0 (Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors)
      0 (Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20210415 Date Completed: 20211005 Latest Revision: 20211005
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC8048349
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12872-021-01969-9
    • Accession Number:
      33853534