Occupational stress, mental health, and self-efficacy among community mental health workers: A cross-sectional study during COVID-19 pandemic.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Sage Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0374726 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1741-2854 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00207640 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Soc Psychiatry Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: <2002->: London : Sage Publications
      Original Publication: London Avenue Publishing Co
    • Subject Terms:
      COVID-19* ; Occupational Stress*/epidemiology; Anxiety ; China/epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Depression/epidemiology ; Humans ; Mental Health ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Self Efficacy ; Surveys and Questionnaires
    • Abstract:
      Background: During the COVID-19, community mental health care workers (CMHWs) faced much heavier workloads, which make them vulnerable to mental problems.
      Aim: This study aims to investigate coronavirus disease-related occupational stress and its single and cumulative effect on mental health and self-efficacy among CMHWs.
      Methods: A quick-response online cross-sectional survey WA conducted during the coronavirus disease outbreak. A total of 536 CMHWs were recruited in March 2020, in China. Demographics, occupational stress, depression, anxiety, positive and negative emotions, and self-efficacy were collected. Logistic regression analysis was employed to test the single and cumulative effect of occupational stress on mental health and self-efficacy.
      Results: CMHWs did not show high level of depression or anxiety in this study. Those who provided service for suspected people who were quarantined reported higher risk of depression and anxiety. Staying out for more than 3 days was a risk factor of depression while cleaning/sterilising streets or communities was a protective factor of depression. Those who received psychiatric training showed higher positive emotion and self-efficacy, and providing psychological assistance online increased the self-efficacy. CMHWs with two different types of work had 0.996 times more risk of depression than those with only one type of work.
      Conclusion: The potential cumulative effect of occupation stress suggested that reasonable job assignment and organisational support are necessary safeguards for CMHWs.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Coronavirus; anxiety; community networks; depression; emotions
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20201112 Date Completed: 20220207 Latest Revision: 20220207
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1177/0020764020972131
    • Accession Number:
      33176527