Changes in Tinnitus by Cochlear Implantation: A Parametric Study of the Effect of Single-Electrode Stimulation.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Karger Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 9606930 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1421-9700 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14203030 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Audiol Neurootol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Basel ; New York : Karger, c1996-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Introduction: While cochlear implantation may have a positive effect on tinnitus, it is not effective in reducing tinnitus in all patients. This may be due to different patients requiring different strategies of electrical stimulation in order to obtain a positive effect on tinnitus. It is, therefore, important to identify the most effective stimulation strategies to reduce tinnitus. The simplest possible strategy is stimulation by only one electrode. In this study, we investigated tinnitus suppression by electrical stimulation via a single electrode of the cochlear implant.
      Methods: We performed a listening experiment in 19 adult participants, who had received a unilateral cochlear implant (CI) because of severe bilateral hearing loss. All of these patients had indicated that they suffered from tinnitus. During a 300-s interval, patients listened to blocks of single-electrode stimulation and rated the loudness of the stimulus and any effects on their tinnitus. The 300-s interval included a block of single-electrode stimulation (duration 120 s). In consecutive intervals, the stimulus differed in its cochlear location (basal or apical), its pulse rate (720 or 725 Hz, 1,200 Hz, and 2,400 or 2,320 Hz), and amplitude (just above threshold or equivalent to moderate loudness). Thus, 2 × 3 × 2 = 12 stimulus conditions were tested in each participant, and each condition was presented only once. During the experiment, the participants promptly rated the loudness of the stimuli and the loudness of their tinnitus on a Visual Analogue Scale (10-point VAS).
      Results: Significantly more tinnitus reduction was observed with stimuli at a moderate intensity level (30%) compared to stimuli at near-threshold level (18%) (χ2 [1, N = 222] = 14.115, p < 0.01). No significant differences in tinnitus levels resulted from the different pulse rates and stimulation sites. Eight participants reported an increase of tinnitus loudness under at least one stimulus condition. Changes in tinnitus loudness were generally minor, and never exceeded 3 points on the VAS. The overall effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus, that is, the effect with full-array stimulation, was not correlated with the effectiveness of the single-electrode stimulation on tinnitus.
      Conclusion: In conclusion, the effect of single-electrode stimulation on tinnitus is relatively insignificant in comparison to the effect of full-array stimulation. However, in some individual cases, sustained single-electrode stimulation may be beneficial for tinnitus management.
      (© 2020 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)
    • References:
      Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009 Apr;36(2):210-2. (PMID: 18614307)
      Br J Audiol. 1993 Feb;27(1):7-17. (PMID: 8339063)
      Otol Neurotol. 2003 May;24(3):478-85. (PMID: 12806303)
      Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(3):161-8. (PMID: 22237032)
      Int J Audiol. 2002 Dec;41(8):527-34. (PMID: 12477173)
      Ciba Found Symp. 1981;85:217-31. (PMID: 6976888)
      Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 Mar 29;6:19. (PMID: 22479238)
      J Am Audiol Soc. 1977 Jan-Feb;2(4):124-31. (PMID: 845067)
      Ear Nose Throat J. 2016 Apr-May;95(4-5):E9-E15. (PMID: 27140029)
      Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;20(5):398-403. (PMID: 22931903)
      Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):125-35. (PMID: 25090456)
      Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Oct;264(10):1145-9. (PMID: 17558507)
      Hear Res. 2013 Jan;295:24-9. (PMID: 23418635)
      Am J Audiol. 2009 Dec;18(2):144-51. (PMID: 19949236)
      Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2003 Apr;36(2):307-20, vii. (PMID: 12856299)
      Hear Res. 2011 Jul;277(1-2):61-6. (PMID: 21447376)
      Cochlear Implants Int. 2018 Sep;19(5):292-296. (PMID: 29772954)
      Br J Audiol. 1977 May;11(2):59-62. (PMID: 922226)
      Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(5):294-313. (PMID: 26227468)
      Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Feb;128(2):159-63. (PMID: 17851950)
      Am J Otol. 1987 Nov;8(6):479-84. (PMID: 3324768)
      Am J Otol. 1994 Jul;15(4):523-31. (PMID: 8588608)
      Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011 Feb;38(1):14-20. (PMID: 20580171)
      Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1995 Aug;98(8):1310-7. (PMID: 7472770)
      Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008 Sep;117(9):645-52. (PMID: 18834065)
      Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Oct;95(3 Pt 1):319-23. (PMID: 3108780)
      Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1993;501:54-8. (PMID: 8447227)
      Acta Otolaryngol. 1979 Mar-Apr;87(3-4):294-9. (PMID: 312586)
      Res Nurs Health. 1990 Aug;13(4):227-36. (PMID: 2197679)
      Auris Nasus Larynx. 2001 Jan;28(1):35-40. (PMID: 11137361)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Cochlear implantation; Electrical stimulation; Tinnitus
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200907 Date Completed: 20210722 Latest Revision: 20210722
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      PMC8117255
    • Accession Number:
      10.1159/000509202
    • Accession Number:
      32894830