Modeling brain, symptom, and behavior in the winds of change.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8904907 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1740-634X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0893133X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Neuropsychopharmacology Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2003- : London : Nature Publishing Group
      Original Publication: [New York, NY] : Elsevier, [c1987-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Neuropsychopharmacology addresses pressing questions in the study of three intertwined complex systems: the brain, human behavior, and symptoms of illness. The field seeks to understand the perturbations that impinge upon those systems, either driving greater health or illness. In the pursuit of this aim, investigators often perform analyses that make certain assumptions about the nature of the systems that are being perturbed. Those assumptions can be encoded in powerful computational models that serve to bridge the wide gulf between a descriptive analysis and a formal theory of a system's response. Here we review a set of three such models along a continuum of complexity, moving from a local treatment to a network treatment: one commonly applied form of the general linear model, impulse response models, and network control models. For each, we describe the model's basic form, review its use in the field, and provide a frank assessment of its relative strengths and weaknesses. The discussion naturally motivates future efforts to interlink data analysis, computational modeling, and formal theory. Our goal is to inspire practitioners to consider the assumptions implicit in their analytical approach, align those assumptions to the complexity of the systems under study, and take advantage of exciting recent advances in modeling the relations between perturbations and system function.
    • References:
      Betzel RF, Bassett DS. Multi-scale brain networks. Neuroimage. 2017;160:73–83.
      Bassett DS, Zurn P, Gold JI. On the nature and use of models in network neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018;19:566–78.
      Avena-Koenigsberger A, Misic B, Sporns O. Communication dynamics in complex brain networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;19:17–33.
      Palmigiano A, Geisel T, Wolf F, Battaglia D. Flexible information routing by transient synchrony. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1014–22.
      Srivastava P, Nozari E, Kim JZ, Ju H, Zhou D, Becker C, et al. Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook. Netw Neurosci. 2020. Advance publication. https://doi.org/10.1162/netn_a_00158 .
      Schafer WR. The worm connectome: back to the future. Trends Neurosci. 2018;41:763–5.
      Butt AM, Fern RF, Matute C. Neurotransmitter signaling in white matter. Glia. 2014;62:1762–79.
      Johansen-Berg H. Human connectomics—what will the future demand? Neuroimage. 2013;80:541–4.
      Le Bihan D, Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function. Neuroimage. 2012;61:324–41.
      Bassett DS, Bullmore E. Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:512–23.
      Mitchell M. Complexity: a guided tour. Oxford University Press; 2011.
      van den Heuvel MP, Bullmore ET, Sporns O. Comparative connectomics. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016;20:345–61.
      Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:159–72.
      Braun U, Schaefer A, Betzel RF, Tost H, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Bassett DS. From maps to multi-dimensional network mechanisms of mental disorders. Neuron. 2018;97:14–31.
      Douw L, van Dellen E, Gouw AA, Griffa A, de Haan W, van den Heuvel M, et al. Stam. The road ahead in clinical network neuroscience. Netw Neurosci. 2019;3:969–93.
      Purves D, Fitzpatrick D, Katz LC, Lamantia AS, McNamara JO, Williams SM, et al. Neuroscience. Sinauer Associates; 2000.
      Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1905–17.
      Koen N, Stein DJ. Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: a critical review. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011;13:423.
      Stein DJ, Ipser JC, Seedat S, Sager C, Amos T. Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;1. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002795.pub2 .
      Buchanan RW, Kreyenbuhl J, Kelly DL, Noel JM, Boggs DL, Fischer BA, et al. The 2009 schizophrenia port psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophrenia Bull. 2010;36:71–93.
      Nusbaum MP, Beenhakker MP. A small-systems approach to motor pattern generation. Nature. 2002;417:343–50.
      Avery MC, Krichmar JL. Neuromodulatory systems and their interactions: a review of models, theories, and experiments. Front Neural Circuits. 2017;11:108.
      Turk E, Scholtens LH, van den Heuvel MP. Cortical chemoarchitecture shapes macroscale effective functional connectivity patterns in macaque cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016;37:1856–65.
      Shine JM, van den Brink RL, Hernaus D, Nieuwenhuis S, Poldrack. RA. Catecholaminergic manipulation alters dynamic network topology across cognitive states. Netw Neurosci. 2018;2:381–96.
      Braun U, Schafer A, Walter H, Erk S, Romanczuk-Seiferth N, Haddad L, et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:11678–83.
      Shine JM, Bissett PG, Bell PT, Koyejo O, Balsters JH, Gorgolewski KJ, et al. The dynamics of functional brain networks: integrated network states during cognitive task performance. Neuron. 2016;92:544–54.
      Shine JM, Breakspear M, Bell PT, Martens KAE, Shine R, Koyejo O, et al. Human cognition involves the dynamic integration of neural activity and neuromodulatory systems. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:289–96.
      Beard C, Millner AJ, Forgeard MJC, Fried EI, Hsu KJ, Treadway MT, et al. Network analysis of depression and anxiety symptom relationships in a psychiatric sample. Psychol Med. 2016;46:3359–69.
      Castillo RJ, Carlat DJ, Millon T, Millon CM, Meagher S, Grossman S, et al. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press; 2007.
      Borsboom D. A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:5–13.
      Nuijten MB, Deserno MK, Cramer A, Borsboom D, et al. Mental disorders as complex networks: an introduction and overview of a network approach to psychopathology. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2016;13:5.
      Bringmann LF, Vissers N, Wichers M, Geschwind N, Kuppens P, Peeters F, et al. A network approach to psychopathology: new insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e60188.
      Schmittmann VD, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Epskamp S, Kievit RA, Borsboom D. Deconstructing the construct: a network perspective on psychological phenomena. N. Ideas Psychol. 2013;31:43–53.
      Bujarski S, Roche DJO, Sheets ES, Krull JL, Guzman I, Ray. LA. Modeling naturalistic craving, withdrawal, and affect during early nicotine abstinence: a pilot ecological momentary assessment study. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23:81.
      Piper ME, Schlam TR, Cook JW, Sheffer MA, Smith SS, Loh W-Y, et al. Tobacco withdrawal components and their relations with cessation success. Psychopharmacology. 2011;216:569–78.
      Hirschfeld RMA, Mallinckrodt C, Lee TC, Detke MJ. Time course of depression-symptom improvement during treatment with duloxetine. Depress Anxiety. 2005;21:170–7.
      Conradi HJ, Ormel J, De Jonge P. Presence of individual (residual) symptoms during depressive episodes and periods of remission: a 3-year prospective study. Psychol Med. 2011;41:1165–74.
      Lydon-Staley DM, Cleveland HH, Huhn AS, Cleveland MJ, Harris J, Stankoski D, et al. Daily sleep quality affects drug craving, partially through indirect associations with positive affect, in patients in treatment for nonmedical use of prescription drugs. Addict Behav. 2017;65:275–82.
      Fisher AJ, Reeves JW, Lawyer G, Medaglia JD, Rubel JA. Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017;126:1044.
      Groen RN, Snippe E, Bringmann LF, Simons CJP, Hartmann JA, Bos EH, et al. Capturing the risk of persisting depressive symptoms: a dynamic network investigation of patients’ daily symptom experiences. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:640–8.
      Cramer AOJ, van Borkulo CD, Giltay EJ, van der Maas HLJ, Kendler KS, Scheffer M, et al. Major depression as a complex dynamic system. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167490.
      Surıs A, Holliday R, North CS. The evolution of the classification of psychiatric disorders. Behav Sci. 2016;6:5.
      Thornton MA, Tamir. DI. Mental models accurately predict emotion transitions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:5982–7.
      Bogacz R, Wagenmakers EJ, Forstmann BU, Nieuwenhuis S. The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:10–6.
      Heitz RP. The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:150.
      Schneider DW, Anderson JR. Asymmetric switch costs as sequential difficulty effects. Q J Exp Psychol. 2010;63:1873–94.
      Arbuthnott KD. Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Can J Exp Psychol. 2008;62:91–100.
      Samuel S, Roehr-Brackin K, Jelbert S, Clayton NS. Flexible egocentricity: asymmetric switch costs on a perspective-taking task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019;45:213–8.
      Verschooren S, Liefooghe B, Brass M, Pourtois G. Attentional flexibility is imbalanced: asymmetric cost for switches between external and internal attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019;45:1399–414.
      Baltes PB, Lindenberger U, Staudinger UM. Life span theory in developmental psychology. In W. Damon (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 1029–1143), 2007. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
      Ford DH, Lerner RM. Developmental systems theory: an integrative approach. Sage Publications, Inc.; 1992.
      Magnusson D, Cairns, RB. Developmental science: toward a unified framework. In RB Cairns, GH Elder, EJ Costello (Eds), Developmental science (pp. 7–30). 1996. Cambridge University Press.
      Berman GJ, Bialek W, Shaevitz JW. Predictability and hierarchy in Drosophila behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:11943–8.
      Berman GJ, Choi DM, Bialek W, Shaevitz JW. Mapping the stereotyped behavior of freely moving fruit flies. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11:20140672.
      Baum WM. Multiscale behavior analysis and molar behaviorism: an overview. J Exp Anal Behav. 2018;110:302–22.
      Maitland C, Stratton G, Foster S, Braham R, Rosenberg M. A place for play? The influence of the home physical environment on children’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:99.
      Brown TM, Fee E. Social movements in health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:385–98.
      Allan J, Querstret D, Banas K, de Bruin M. Environmental interventions for altering eating behaviours of employees in the workplace: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2017;18:214–26.
      Tang SX, Seelaus KH, Moore TM, Taylor J, Moog C, O’Connor D, Burkholder M, et al. Theatre improvisation training to promote social cognition: a novel recovery-oriented intervention for youths at clinical risk for psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020;14:163–71.
      Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press; 1979.
      Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline J-P, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;2:189–210.
      Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
      Vuilleumier P, Armony JL, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron. 2001;30:829–41.
      Anticevic A, Cole MW, Murray JD, Corlett PR, Wang X-J, Krystal JH. The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16:584–92.
      Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle. ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9673–8.
      Spreng RN, Mar RA, Kim. ASN. The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21:489–510.
      Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager. TD. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods. 2011;8:665.
      Barch DM, Burgess GC, Harms MP, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL, Corbetta M, et al. Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior. Neuroimage. 2013;80:169–89.
      Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Ruparel K, Loughead J, Prabhakaran K, Calkins ME, et al. Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. Neuroimage. 2014;86:544–53.
      Murphy AC, Bertolero MA, Papadopoulos L, Lydon-Staley DM, Bassett DS. Multimodal network dynamics underpinning working memory. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3035.
      Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Erus G, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Gennatas ED, et al. Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence. J Neurosci. 2013;33:16249–61.
      Lamichhane B, Westbrook A, Cole MW, Braver T. Exploring brain-behavior relationships in the n-back task. NeuroImage. 2020;212:116683.
      Edel M-A, Blackwell B, Schaub M, Emons B, Fox T, Tornau F, et al. Antidepressive response of inpatients with major depression to adjuvant occupational therapy: a case–control study. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017;16:1.
      West R, Baker CL, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG. Effect of varenicline and bupropion SR on craving, nicotine withdrawal symptoms, and rewarding effects of smoking during a quit attempt. Psychopharmacology. 2008;197:371–7.
      Tschanz JT, Pfister R, Wanzek J, Corcoran C, Smith K, Tschanz BT, et al. Stressful life events and cognitive decline in late life: moderation by education and age. The Cache County Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28:821–30.
      Alexander DM, Jurica P, Trengove C, Nikolaev AR, Gepshtein S, Zvyagintsev M, et al. Traveling waves and trial averaging: the nature of single-trial and averaged brain responses in large-scale cortical signals. Neuroimage. 2013;73:95–112.
      Steffener J, Tabert M, Reuben A, Stern Y. Investigating hemodynamic response variability at the group level using basis functions. Neuroimage. 2010;49:2113–22.
      Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D’esposito M. The variability of human, bold hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage. 1998;8:360–9.
      Handwerker DA, Ollinger JM, D’Esposito M. Variation of bold hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses. Neuroimage. 2004;21:1639–51.
      Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:7900–5.
      Kessler D, Angstadt M, Sripada CS. Reevaluating “cluster failure” in fMRI using nonparametric control of the false discovery rate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E3372–E3373.
      Fox MD, Greicius M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010;4:19.
      Simon HA. The organization of complex systems. In: Models of discovery, Vol. 54. Dordrecht: Springer; 1977.
      Grellmann C, Bitzer S, Neumann J, Westlye LT, Andreassen OA, Villringer A, et al. Comparison of variants of canonical correlation analysis and partial least squares for combined analysis of MRI and genetic data. Neuroimage. 2015;107:289–310.
      Wang H-T, Smallwood J, Mourao-Miranda J, Xia CH, Satterthwaite TD, Bassett DS, et al. Finding the needle in a high-dimensional haystack: canonical correlation analysis for neuroscientists. Neuroimage. 2020;216:116745.
      Newman, MEJ. Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press; 2010.
      Fried EI, Epskamp S, Nesse RM, Tuerlinckx F, Borsboom D. What are ‘good’ depression symptoms? Comparing the centrality of DSM and non-DSM symptoms of depression in a network analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;189:314–20.
      Hasmi L, Drukker M, Guloksuz S, Menne-Lothmann C, Decoster J, van Winkel R, et al. Network approach to understanding emotion dynamics in relation to childhood trauma and genetic liability to psychopathology: replication of a prospective experience sampling analysis. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1908.
      Lydon-Staley DM, Xia M, Mak HW, Fosco GM. Adolescent emotion network dynamics in daily life and implications for depression. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019;47:717–29.
      Pe ML, Kircanski K, Thompson RJ, Bringmann LF, Tuerlinckx F, Mestdagh M, et al. Emotion-network density in major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol Sci. 2015;3:292–300.
      Borsboom D, Cramer AOJ. Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:91–121.
      Bringmann LF, Elmer T, Epskamp S, Krause RW, Schoch D, Wichers M, et al. What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? J Abnorm Psychol. 2019;128:892.
      Lutkepohl H. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer Science & Business Media; 2005.
      Blaauw FJ, van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Aiello M, de Jonge P. Personalized advice for enhancing well-being using automated impulse response analysis—AIRA. 2017. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09268 .
      Bos FM, Blaauw FJ, Snippe E, Van der Krieke L, De Jonge P, Wichers M. Exploring the emotional dynamics of subclinically depressed individuals with and without anhedonia: an experience sampling study. J Affect Disord. 2018;228:186–93.
      Yang X, Ram N, Lougheed JP, Molenaar P, Hollenstein T. Adolescents’ emotion system dynamics: network-based analysis of physiological and emotional experience. Dev Psychol. 2019;55:1982.
      Lydon-Staley DM, Leventhal AM, Piper M, Schnoll RA, Bassett DS. More than the sum of its parts: a network perspective on tobacco withdrawal. 2019. Preprint at https://psyarxiv.com/t2a9q .
      Yang X, Ram N, Gest SD, Lydon-Staley DM, Conroy DE, Pincus AL, et al. Socioemotional dynamics of emotion regulation and depressive symptoms: a person-specific network approach. Complexity 2018;2018:5094179.
      Allen JJB, Chambers AS, Towers DN. The many metrics of cardiac chronotropy: a pragmatic primer and a brief comparison of metrics. Biol Psychol. 2007;74:243–62.
      Dooren Mvan, Janssen JH, et al. Emotional sweating across the body: comparing 16 different skin conductance measurement locations. Physiol Behav. 2012;106:298–304.
      Hollenstein T, Lanteigne D. Models and methods of emotional concordance. Biol Psychol. 2014;98:1–5.
      Helion C, Krueger SM, Ochsner KN. Emotion regulation across the life span. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;163:257–80.
      de Zwart JA, Silva AC, van Gelderen P, Kellman P, Fukunaga M, Chu R, et al. Temporal dynamics of the bold fMRI impulse response. Neuroimage. 2005;24:667–77.
      Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ. Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human v1. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4207–21.
      Cole MW, Ito T, Bassett DS, Schultz. DH. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1718.
      Ito T, Kulkarni KR, Schultz DH, Mill RD, Chen RH, Solomyak LI, et al. Cognitive task information is transferred between brain regions via resting-state network topology. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–14.
      Karrer TM, Kim JZ, Stiso J, Kahn AE, Pasqualetti F, Habel U, et al. A practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks. J Neural Eng. 2020;17:026031.
      Gu S, Pasqualetti F, Cieslak M, Telesford QK, Alfred BY, Kahn AE, et al. Controllability of structural brain networks. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–10.
      Tang E, Giusti C, Baum GL, Gu S, Pollock E, Kahn AE, et al. Developmental increases in white matter network controllability support a growing diversity of brain dynamics. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1252.
      Cornblath EJ, Tang E, Baum GL, Moore TM, Adebimpe A, Roalf DR, et al. Sex differences in network controllability as a predictor of executive function in youth. Neuroimage. 2019;188:122–34.
      Jeganathan J, Perry A, Bassett DS, Roberts G, Mitchell PB, Breakspear M. Fronto-limbic dysconnectivity leads to impaired brain network controllability in young people with bipolar disorder and those at high genetic risk. NeuroImage Clin. 2018;19:71–81.
      Gollo LL, Roberts JA, Cocchi L. Mapping how local perturbations influence systems level brain dynamics. Neuroimage. 2017;160:97–112.
      Papadopoulos L, Lynn CW, Battaglia D, Bassett DS. Relations between large scale brain connectivity and effects of regional stimulation depend on collective dynamical state. 2020. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00094 .
      Breakspear M. Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:340.
      Muldoon SF, Pasqualetti F, Gu S, Cieslak M, Grafton ST, Vettel JM. et al. Stimulation-based control of dynamic brain networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1005076.
      Lutz W, Schwartz B, Hofmann SG, Fisher AJ, Husen K, Rubel. JA. Using network analysis for the prediction of treatment dropout in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: a methodological proof-of-concept study. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–9.
      Bringmann LF, Ferrer E, Hamaker EL, Borsboom D, Tuerlinckx F. Modeling nonstationary emotion dynamics in dyads using a time-varying vector-autoregressive model. Multivar Behav Res. 2018;53:293–314.
      Fried EI. The 52 symptoms of major depression: lack of content overlap among seven common depression scales. J Affect Disord. 2017;208:191–7.
      Kim JZ, Bassett DS. Linear dynamics and control of brain networks. In: He B, editor. Neural engineering. Springer Nature; 2019.
      Tang E, Bassett DS. Control of dynamics in brain networks. Rev Mod Phys 2018;90:031003.
      Betzel RF, Gu S, Medaglia JD, Pasqualetti F, Bassett DS. Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30770.
      Gu S, Betzel RF, Mattar MG, Cieslak M, Delio PR, Grafton ST, et al. Optimal trajectories of brain state transitions. Neuroimage. 2017;148:305–17.
      Stiso J, Khambhati AN, Menara T, Kahn AE, Stein JM, Das SR, et al. White matter network architecture guides direct electrical stimulation through optimal state transitions. Cell Rep. 2019;28:2554–66.
      Cornblath EJ, Ashourvan A, Kim JZ, Betzel RF, Ciric R, Adebimpe A, et al. Temporal sequences of brain activity at rest are constrained by white matter structure and modulated by cognitive demands. Commun Biol. 2020;3:261.
      Yan G, Vertes PE, Towlson EK, Chew YL, Walker DS, Schafer WR, et al. Network control principles predict neuron function in the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome. Nature. 2017;550:519–23.
      Ju H, Kim JZ, Bassett DS. Network structure of cascading neural systems predicts stimulus propagation and recovery. 2018. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.09361.pdf .
      Kim JZ, Soffer JM, Kahn AE, Vettel JM, Pasqualetti F, Bassett DS. Role of graph architecture in controlling dynamical networks with applications to neural systems. Nat Phys. 2018;14:91.
      Towlson EK, Vertes PE, Yan G, Chew YL, Walker DS, Schafer WR, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans and the network control framework-FAQs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373:1758.
      Sigaud O, Stulp F. Policy search in continuous action domains: an overview. Neural Netw. 2019;113:28–40.
      Becker CO, Bassett DS, Preciado VM. Large-scale dynamic modeling of task-fMRI signals via subspace system identification. J Neural Eng. 2018;15:066016.
      Ashourvan A, Pequito S, Bertolero M, Kim JZ, Bassett DS, Litt B. A dynamical systems framework to uncover the drivers of large-scale cortical activity. 2019. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/638718v1 .
      Sani OG, Yang Y, Lee MB, Dawes HE, Chang EF, Shanechi MM. Mood variations decoded from multi-site intracranial human brain activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:954–61.
      Anumanchipalli GK, Chartier J, Chang EF. Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature. 2019;568:493–8.
      Braun U, Harneit A, Pergola G, Menara T, Schaefer A, Betzel RF, et al. Brain state stability during working memory is explained by network control theory, modulated by dopamine d1/d2 receptor function, and diminished in schizophrenia. 2019. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.09290 .
      Zoller D, Sandini C, Schaer M, Eliez S, Bassett DS, Van De Ville D. Structural control energy of resting-state functional brain states reveals inefficient brain dynamics in psychosis vulnerability. 2019. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/703561v1 .
      Cornblath EJ, Lydon-Staley DM, Bassett DS. Harnessing networks and machine learning in neuropsychiatric care. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019;55:32–39.
      Fisher AJ, Boswell JF. Enhancing the personalization of psychotherapy with dynamic assessment and modeling. Assessment. 2016;23:496–506.
      Kroeze R, van der Veen DC, Servaas MN, Bastiaansen JA, Voshaar RO, Borsboom D, Riese H. Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: a proof-of-principle study. J Pers Oriented Res. 2017;3:1–11.
      Beck ED, Jackson JJ. Consistency and change in idiographic personality: a longitudinal ESM network study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019;118:1080–100.
      Henry T, Robinaugh D, Fried E. On the control of psychological networks. 2020. Preprint at https://psyarxiv.com/7vpz2/ .
      Chang J-Y, Pigorini A, Massimini M, Tononi G, Nobili L, Van Veen BD. Multivariate autoregressive models with exogenous inputs for intracerebral responses to direct electrical stimulation of the human brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:317.
      Yang Y, Sani OG, Chang EF, Shanechi MM. Dynamic network modeling and dimensionality reduction for human ecog activity. J Neural Eng. 2019;16:056014.
      Xia CH, Ma Z, Ciric R, Gu S, Betzel RF, Kaczkurkin AN, et al. Linked dimensions of psychopathology and connectivity in functional brain networks. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3003.
      Smith SM, Nichols TE, Vidaurre D, Winkler AM, Behrens TE, Glasser MF, et al. A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1565–7.
      Bianconi G. Multilayer networks: structure and function. Oxford University Press; 2018.
      Menichetti G, Dall’Asta L, Bianconi G. Control of multilayer networks. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20706.
      Gagnier JJ, Moher D, Boon H, Beyene J, Bombardier C. Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:111.
      Vu M-AT, Adalı T, Ba D, Buzsaki G, Carlson D, Heller K, et al. A shared vision for machine learning in neuroscience. J Neurosci. 2018;38:1601–7.
      Ertekin S, Rudin C. A Bayesian approach to learning scoring systems. Big Data. 2015;3:267–76.
      Platt JR. Strong inference. Science. 1964;146:347–53.
      Bertolero MA, Bassett DS. On the nature of explanations offered by network science: a perspective from and for practicing neuroscientists. Top Cogn Sci. 2020. Advanced publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12504 .
      Ross LN. Causal selection and the pathway concept. Philos Sci. 2018;85:551–72.
      Ross LN. Causal concepts in biology: how pathways differ from mechanisms and why it matters. Br J Philos Sci. 2018;0:1–30.
      Dworkin JD, Linn KA, Teich EG, Zurn P, Shinohara RT, Bassett DS. The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:918-26.
      Maliniak D, Powers R, Walter BF. The gender citation gap in international relations. Int Organ. 2013;67:889–922.
      Caplar N, Tacchella S, Birrer S. Quantitative evaluation of gender bias in astronomical publications from citation counts. Nat Astron. 2017;1:0141.
      Chakravartty P, Kuo R, Grubbs V, McIlwain. C. #CommunicationSoWhite. J Commun. 2018;68:254–66.
      Thiem Y, Sealey KF, Ferrer AE, Trott AM, Kennison R. Just Ideas? The status and future of publication ethics in philosophy: a white paper. Technical report. 2018. https://publication-ethics.org/white-paper/ .
      Dion ML, Sumner JL, Mitchell SM. Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Anal. 2018;26:312–27.
      Zhou D, Cornblath EJ, Stiso J, Teich EG, Dworkin JD, Blevins AS, et al. Gender diversity statement and code notebook v1.0. 2020.  https://github.com/dalejn/cleanBib .
    • Grant Information:
      R01 MH107235 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; F30 MH118871 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; R01-MH112847 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; R01 GM116920 United States GM NIGMS NIH HHS; R21-M MH-106799 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; 2-R01-DC-009209-11 United States MH NIMH NIH HHS; K01 DA047417 United States DA NIDA NIH HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200830 Date Completed: 20210623 Latest Revision: 20240523
    • Publication Date:
      20240524
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7689481
    • Accession Number:
      10.1038/s41386-020-00805-6
    • Accession Number:
      32859996