The Diagnostic Process for the Evaluation of Acute Abdominal Pain by Resident Trainees in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Japanese Society of Internal Medicine Country of Publication: Japan NLM ID: 9204241 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1349-7235 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09182918 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Intern Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Tokyo, Japan : Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, [1992-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective Acute abdominal pain (AAP) of diverse etiology is a common chief complaint of patients who present to the emergency department (ED). AAP may pose a diagnostic challenge to physicians in training. We aimed to evaluate whether or not resident trainee doctors examine patients presenting with AAP in a Japanese acute-care hospital following Kendall's diagnostic algorithm. Methods We conducted a retrospective medical chart review from January 2015 to December 2016. Patients Patients ≥50 years old who presented to the ED within 7 days of the onset of AAP who were evaluated by residents at the ED of an acute care hospital were enrolled in this study. Patients transported by ambulance and referred from other hospitals and classified as level 1 or 2 according to the Japanese version of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale were excluded. Data, including the clinical history, location and character of pain, and age and gender of patients as well as the level of experience of residents, were abstracted from charts. We evaluated the concordance rate between the actual diagnostic process followed by residents and Kendall's diagnostic algorithm for AAP. Results We analyzed 466 patients (mean age 67.6 years) in the study who were evaluated and diagnosed by 123 residents. The concordance rate between the diagnostic procedures performed by residents and those suggested by Kendall's diagnostic algorithm was 61.2%. A low concordance rate was observed among patients with peritoneal signs, shock or toxic appearance (25.0%), suggested acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (55.1%), epigastric or right upper-quadrant pain (52.8%), and left upper-quadrant pain (55.6%). Abdominal ultrasonography is one of the recommended examinations for patients with signs of peritoneal irritation, shock or toxic appearance, right lower-quadrant pain, and left upper- or lower-quadrant pain, but the rates were relatively low at 25.0%, 34.4%, 31.8%, and 26.7%, respectively. Conclusion Abdominal ultrasonography required by Kendall's diagnostic algorithm was not performed appropriately in patients with symptoms and signs of peritonitis, shock or toxic appearance, right lower-quadrant pain, and left upper- or lower-quadrant pain or in female patients by resident trainees. Our findings underscore the importance of providing resident doctors with focused training concerning ultrasonography by attending physicians.
    • References:
      AACN Adv Crit Care. 2014 Jul-Sep;25(3):266-78. (PMID: 25054532)
      Int Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jul;22(3):153-8. (PMID: 24210955)
      J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Sep;6(3):532-5. (PMID: 26279781)
      CJEM. 2017 Jul;19(S2):S18-S27. (PMID: 28756800)
      J Vasc Surg. 2003 May;37(5):1106-17. (PMID: 12756363)
      BMJ. 2009 Jun 26;338:b2431. (PMID: 19561056)
      Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8. (PMID: 23208313)
      Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7269. (PMID: 28640133)
      Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Mar;22(3):579-82. (PMID: 8442548)
      Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;58(5):452-62.e3. (PMID: 21835499)
      Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011 Spring;16(1):11-5. (PMID: 21523201)
      Eye (Lond). 2015 May;29(5):619-24. (PMID: 25697458)
      Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;29(7):711-6. (PMID: 20825873)
      Can J Surg. 2003 Apr;46(2):111-6. (PMID: 12691347)
      Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Aug;26(2):179-83. (PMID: 12917835)
      J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Mar;11(3):316-22. (PMID: 24485592)
      Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Mar;18(1):24-30. (PMID: 25814200)
      J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016 Jan;23(1):3-36. (PMID: 26692573)
      J Hosp Med. 2012 Feb;7(2):85-90. (PMID: 22095750)
      JAMA. 2010 Sep 15;304(11):1198-203. (PMID: 20841533)
      Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 May;25(5):822-7. (PMID: 12049375)
      Circulation. 2008 Dec 16;118(25):2702-9. (PMID: 19106393)
      Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):e82-292. (PMID: 15339869)
      Am Fam Physician. 2011 Jan 15;83(2):159-65. (PMID: 21243991)
      BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Nov 25;2015:. (PMID: 26607191)
      J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Nov;8(11):772-5. (PMID: 22051460)
      World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(2):124-9. (PMID: 27313807)
      J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):214-20, quiz 220-1. (PMID: 18722744)
      Dig Surg. 2015;32(1):23-31. (PMID: 25659265)
      J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 16;60(16):1581-98. (PMID: 22958960)
      Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12):1069-75. (PMID: 17122471)
      PLoS One. 2015 May 06;10(5):e0126036. (PMID: 25946125)
      Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012;3(3):97-9. (PMID: 22288057)
      Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 27;160(6):833-6. (PMID: 10737283)
      Am Fam Physician. 2015 Apr 1;91(7):452-9. (PMID: 25884745)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: abdominal pain; concordance rate; diagnostic algorithm; physical examination; resident
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200519 Date Completed: 20200616 Latest Revision: 20200624
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7303460
    • Accession Number:
      10.2169/internalmedicine.3526-19
    • Accession Number:
      32418953