A narrative analysis of anti-abortion testimony and legislative debate related to Georgia's fetal "heartbeat" abortion ban.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Taylor & Francis Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101743493 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2641-0397 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 26410397 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sex Reprod Health Matters Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: [London, United Kingdom] : Taylor & Francis, [2019]-
    • Subject Terms:
      Beginning of Human Life* ; Government Regulation* ; Personhood*; Abortion, Induced/*legislation & jurisprudence ; Human Rights/*legislation & jurisprudence; Female ; Fetal Viability ; Georgia ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Pregnant Women
    • Abstract:
      Fetal "heartbeat" bills have become the anti-abortion legislative measure of choice in the US war on sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). In 2019, Georgia House Bill 481 (HB 481) passed by a narrow margin banning abortions upon detection of embryonic cardiac activity, as early as six weeks gestation. The purpose of this study was to distinguish and characterise the arguments and tactics used by legislators and community members in support of Georgia's early abortion ban. Our data included testimony and debate from House Health and Human Services and the Senate Science and Technology Committees; data were transcribed verbatim and coded in MAXQDA 18 using a constant comparison method. Major themes included: the use of the "heartbeat" as an indicator of life and therefore personhood; an attempt to create a new class of persons - fetuses in utero - entitled to legal protection; and arguments to expand state protections for fetuses as a matter of state sovereignty and rights. Arguments were furthered through appropriation by misrepresenting medical science and co-opting the legal successes of progressive movements. Our analysis provides an initial understanding of evolving early abortion ban strategy and its tactics for challenging established legal standards and precedent. As the battle over SRHR wages on, opponents of abortion bans should attempt to understand, deconstruct, and analyse anti-abortion messaging to effectively combat it. These data may inform their tactical strategies to advance sexual and reproductive health, rights, and justice both in the US context and beyond.
    • References:
      Pediatrics. 2016 May;137(5):. (PMID: 27244834)
      U S Rep U S Supreme Court. 1973;410:179-223. (PMID: 12038362)
      Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e187-e199. (PMID: 28937572)
      Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):e197-e207. (PMID: 30157093)
      BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):76. (PMID: 31200696)
      U S Rep U S Supreme Court. 1973;410:113-78. (PMID: 12038376)
      Am J Law Med. 2013;39(4):573-616. (PMID: 24494444)
      Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):330-4. (PMID: 1876359)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: abortion; anti-abortion; anti-choice; law; legislation; policy; pro-life
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20200102 Date Completed: 20200408 Latest Revision: 20240331
    • Publication Date:
      20240331
    • Accession Number:
      PMC7887961
    • Accession Number:
      10.1080/26410397.2019.1686201
    • Accession Number:
      31892281