Extrapancreatic Inflammation on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Early Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8608542 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1536-4828 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 08853177 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Pancreas Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Hagerstown, MD : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      Original Publication: [New York, N.Y.] : Raven Press, [c1986-
    • Subject Terms:
      Inflammation/*diagnostic imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/*methods ; Pancreatitis/*diagnosis ; Pancreatitis/*diagnostic imaging; Acute Disease ; Adult ; Aged ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation/complications ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatitis/complications ; Predictive Value of Tests ; ROC Curve ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
    • Abstract:
      Objectives: This work aimed to study the early predictive value of extrapancreatic inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging (EPIM) for acute pancreatitis (AP) severity.
      Methods: The EPIM score, magnetic resonance severity index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, bedside index of severity in AP, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were evaluated for 337 AP patients. The extrapancreatic inflammation on computed tomography (EPIC) was also assessed for 86 patients undergoing computed tomography. The predictive values of these scores for severe AP and organ failure were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.
      Results: Of the 337 AP patients, 55 (16.3%) had organ failure and 17 (5.0%) had severe AP. The EPIM showed a strong correlation with the EPIC (r = 0.794, P < 0.001) and had a higher correlation with the APACHE II and hospital stay compared with the EPIC. The accuracy of the EPIM in predicting severe AP and organ failure (areas under the curve, 0.844 and 0.817) was consistent with that of the APACHE II and bedside index of severity in AP, and higher than that of the magnetic resonance severity index.
      Conclusion: The EPIM is more helpful in assessing AP severity than the EPIC and can indicate the occurrence of severe AP and organ failure early.
    • References:
      Lankisch PG, Apte M, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2015;386:85–96.
      Bhatia M, Wong FL, Cao Y, et al. Pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2005;5:132–144.
      Zaheer A, Singh VK, Qureshi RO, et al. The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: updates in imaging terminology and guidelines. Abdom Imaging. 2013;38:125–136.
      Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–111.
      Cho JH, Kim TN, Chung HH, et al. Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2387–2394.
      Talukdar R, Vege SS. Acute pancreatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31:374–379.
      Thandassery RB, Yadav TD, Dutta U, et al. Dynamic nature of organ failure in severe acute pancreatitis: the impact of persistent and deteriorating organ failure. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:523–528.
      He WH, Zhu Y, Zhu Y, et al. Comparison of multifactor scoring systems and single serum markers for the early prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:1895–1901.
      Khanna AK, Meher S, Prakash S, et al. Comparison of Ranson, Glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE-II, CTSI scores, IL-6, CRP, and procalcitonin in predicting severity, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, and mortality in acute pancreatitis. HPB Surg. 2013;2013:367581.
      Vasudevan S, Goswami P, Sonika U, et al. Comparison of various scoring systems and biochemical markers in predicting the outcome in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2017;47:65–71.
      Fei Y, Gao K, Tu J, et al. Predicting and evaluation the severity in acute pancreatitis using a new modeling built on body mass index and intra-abdominal pressure. Am J Surg. 2018;216:304–309.
      Gravito-Soares M, Gravito-Soares E, Gomes D, et al. Red cell distribution width and red cell distribution width to total serum calcium ratio as major predictors of severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18:108.
      Karpavicius A, Dambrauskas Z, Gradauskas A, et al. The clinical value of adipokines in predicting the severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:99–106.
      Harshit Kumar A, Singh Griwan M. A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta classification. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018;6:127–131.
      Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, et al. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut. 2008;57:1698–1703.
      Pezzilli R, Zerbi A, Di Carlo V, et al. Practical guidelines for acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2010;10:523–535.
      Banday IA, Gattoo I, Khan AM, et al. Modified computed tomography severity index for evaluation of acute pancreatitis and its correlation with clinical outcome: a tertiary care hospital based observational study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:C1–C5.
      Alhajeri A, Erwin S. Acute pancreatitis: value and impact of CT severity index. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:18–20.
      Chen C, Huang Z, Li H, et al. Evaluation of extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of organ failure in acute pancreatitis as defined by the revised Atlanta classification. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e6517.
      De Waele JJ, Delrue L, Hoste EA, et al. Extrapancreatic inflammation on abdominal computed tomography as an early predictor of disease severity in acute pancreatitis: evaluation of a new scoring system. Pancreas. 2007;34:185–190.
      Manikkavasakar S, AlObaidy M, Busireddy KK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatitis: an update. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:14760–14777.
      Tang W, Zhang XM, Xiao B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus Acute Physiology and Chronic Healthy Evaluation II score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:637–642.
      Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, et al. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990;174:331–336.
      Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.
      Sharma V, Rana SS, Sharma RK, et al. A study of radiological scoring system evaluating extrapancreatic inflammation with conventional radiological and clinical scores in predicting outcomes in acute pancreatitis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28:399–404.
      Liu J, Cao F, Dong XM, et al. Early prediction of organ failure under the revised Atlanta classification. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28:46–52.
      Jin T, Lin ZQ, Xue P, et al. [The value of different scoring systems for computed tomography in predicting pancreatic pseudocyst in severe acute pancreatitis]. [Article in Chinese]. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2013;44:970–973.
      Shyu JY, Sainani NI, Sahni VA, et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: diagnosis, imaging, and intervention. Radiographics. 2014;34:1218–1239.
      Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:612–619.
      Forsmark CE, Vege SS, Wilcox CM. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1972–1981.
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20191220 Date Completed: 20201228 Latest Revision: 20210212
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1097/MPA.0000000000001425
    • Accession Number:
      31856079