Influence of an Implementation Support Intervention on Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of a Substance Use Prevention Program.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 100894724 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-6695 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 13894986 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Prev Sci Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: New York, NY : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, c2000-
    • Subject Terms:
      Cooperative Behavior*; Adolescent Health Services/*organization & administration ; Health Promotion/*organization & administration ; Substance-Related Disorders/*prevention & control; Adolescent ; Capacity Building/organization & administration ; Child ; Community-Based Participatory Research ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Organizational Innovation ; Primary Prevention ; Process Assessment, Health Care ; Program Evaluation ; United States
    • Abstract:
      Implementation support interventions have helped organizations implement programs with quality and obtain intended outcomes. For example, a recent randomized controlled trial called Preparing to Run Effective Programs (PREP) showed that an implementation support intervention called Getting To Outcomes (GTO) improved implementation of an evidence-based substance use prevention program (CHOICE) run in community-based settings. However, more information is needed on how these interventions affect organizational barriers and facilitators of implementation. This paper aims to identify differences in implementation facilitators and barriers in sites conducting a substance use prevention program with and without GTO. PREP is a cluster-randomized controlled trial testing GTO, a two-year implementation support intervention, in Boys & Girls Clubs. The trial compares 15 Boys & Girls Club sites implementing CHOICE (control group), a five-session evidence-based alcohol and drug prevention program, with 14 Boys & Girls Club sites implementing CHOICE supported by GTO (intervention group). All sites received CHOICE training. Intervention sites also received GTO manuals, training, and onsite technical assistance to help practitioners complete implementation best practices specified by GTO (i.e., GTO steps). During the first year, technical assistance providers helped the intervention group adopt, plan, and deliver CHOICE, and then evaluate and make quality improvements to CHOICE implementation using feedback reports summarizing their data. Following the second year of CHOICE and GTO implementation, all sites participated in semi-structured interviews to identify barriers and facilitators to CHOICE implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). This paper assesses the extent to which these facilitators and barriers differed between intervention and control group. Intervention sites had significantly higher average ratings than control sites for two constructs from the CFIR process domain: planning and reflecting and evaluating. At the same time, intervention sites had significantly lower ratings on the culture and available resources constructs. Findings suggest that strong planning, evaluation, and reflection-likely improved with GTO support-can facilitate implementation even in the face of perceptions of a less desirable implementation climate. These findings highlight that implementation support, such as GTO, is likely to help low-resourced community-based organizations improve program delivery through a focus on implementation processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This project is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02135991 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02135991). The trial was first registered May 12, 2014.
    • References:
      Health Educ Res. 2002 Aug;17(4):461-70. (PMID: 12197591)
      Implement Sci. 2016 May 31;11(1):78. (PMID: 27245158)
      Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72. (PMID: 27189233)
      Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):233-241. (PMID: 27688249)
      Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Sep;163(9):789-98. (PMID: 19736331)
      Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Dec;21(4):592-8. (PMID: 18072844)
      J Prim Prev. 2008 Nov;29(6):479-88. (PMID: 19015989)
      Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5):395-402. (PMID: 17478265)
      Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67. (PMID: 19840381)
      Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):206-24. (PMID: 18278551)
      Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 07;8:87. (PMID: 23924279)
      Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50. (PMID: 19664226)
      Prev Sci. 2018 May;19(4):437-448. (PMID: 28971273)
      Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. (PMID: 18322790)
      Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):356-65. (PMID: 20528063)
      Prev Sci. 2003 Mar;4(1):1-14. (PMID: 12611415)
      Prev Sci. 2009 Mar;10(1):33-40. (PMID: 19002583)
      Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Mar;29(3):474-83. (PMID: 15770124)
      Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):131. (PMID: 30348227)
      Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 23;6:110. (PMID: 29740572)
      Implement Sci. 2013 May 10;8:51. (PMID: 23663819)
      Prev Sci. 2013 Dec;14(6):581-92. (PMID: 23404662)
      J Community Psychol. 2015 Apr;43(4):484-501. (PMID: 26668443)
      Prev Sci. 2012 Aug;13(4):415-25. (PMID: 22311178)
      Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81. (PMID: 22594758)
    • Grant Information:
      R01 AA022353 United States AA NIAAA NIH HHS; RO1AA022353-01 United States AA NIAAA NIH HHS
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: CFIR; Community-based,; Evidence-based program; Fidelity; GTO; Implementation support
    • Molecular Sequence:
      ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02135991
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190902 Date Completed: 20200727 Latest Revision: 20201101
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6883157
    • Accession Number:
      10.1007/s11121-019-01037-x
    • Accession Number:
      31473932