Targeted puncture of left branch of intrahepatic portal vein in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt to reduce hepatic encephalopathy.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Baishideng Publishing Group Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 100883448 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2219-2840 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10079327 NLM ISO Abbreviation: World J Gastroenterol Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2014- : Pleasanton, CA : Baishideng Publishing Group
      Original Publication: Beijing : WJG Press, c1998-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is currently used for the treatment of complications of portal hypertension. The incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains a problem in TIPS placement. It has been reported that the right branch mainly receives superior mesenteric venous blood while the left branch mainly receives blood from the splenic vein. We hypothesized that targeted puncture of the left portal vein would divert the non-nutritive blood from the splenic vein into the TIPS shunt; therefore, targeted puncture of the left branch of the intrahepatic portal vein during TIPS may reduce the risk of HE.
      Aim: To evaluate the influence of targeted puncture of left branch of portal vein in TIPS on HE.
      Methods: A retrospective analysis of 1244 patients with portal-hypertension-related complications of refractory ascites or variceal bleeding who underwent TIPS from January 2000 to January 2013 was performed. Patients were divided into group A (targeting left branch of portal vein, n = 937) and group B (targeting right branch of portal vein, n = 307). TIPS-related HE and clinical outcomes were analyzed.
      Results: The symptoms of ascites and variceal bleeding disappeared within a short time. By the endpoint of follow-up, recurrent bleeding and ascites did not differ significantly between groups A and B ( P = 0.278, P = 0.561, respectively). Incidence of HE differed significantly between groups A and B at 1 mo (14.94% vs 36.80%, χ 2 = 4.839, P = 0.028), 3 mo (12.48% vs 34.20%, χ 2 = 5.054, P = 0.025), 6 mo (10.03% vs 32.24%, χ 2 = 6.560, P = 0.010), 9 mo (9.17% vs 31.27%, χ 2 = 5.357, P = 0.021), and 12 mo (8.21% vs 28.01, χ 2 = 3.848, P = 0.051). There were no significant differences between groups A and B at 3 years (6.61% vs 7.16%, χ 2 = 1.204, P = 0.272) and 5 years (5.01% vs 6.18%, χ 2 = 0.072, P = 0.562). The total survival rate did not differ between groups A and B ( χ 2 = 0.226, P = 0.634, log-rank test).
      Conclusion: Targeted puncture of the left branch of the intrahepatic portal vein during TIPS may reduce the risk of HE but has no direct influence on prognosis of portal-hypertension-related complications.
      Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.
    • References:
      Surg Radiol Anat. 2000;22(5-6):239-42. (PMID: 11236316)
      Hepatology. 2002 Nov;36(5):1163-71. (PMID: 12395326)
      Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2002 Dec;10(6):437-40. (PMID: 12502447)
      Anat Histol Embryol. 2007 Apr;36(2):83-7. (PMID: 17371378)
      J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Feb;20(2):180-5. (PMID: 19097918)
      Liver Int. 2009 Aug;29(7):1101-9. (PMID: 19386025)
      N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24;362(25):2370-9. (PMID: 20573925)
      J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun;25(6):1111-6. (PMID: 20594227)
      Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Sep;96(3):508-15. (PMID: 22836032)
      J Hepatol. 2013 Nov;59(5):1081-93. (PMID: 23811307)
      Hepatology. 2014 Feb;59(2):622-9. (PMID: 24620380)
      Anat Histol Embryol. 2015 Jun;44(3):212-24. (PMID: 25090952)
      Anat Histol Embryol. 2015 Dec;44(6):460-7. (PMID: 25376527)
      J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1257-65; quiz 1265. (PMID: 25990133)
      Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Feb;39(2):170-82. (PMID: 26285910)
      Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;111(4):523-8. (PMID: 26925879)
      Liver Transpl. 2016 Jun;22(6):732-42. (PMID: 27028317)
      Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 1;162:147-50. (PMID: 27080082)
      World J Hepatol. 2016 Apr 18;8(11):520-9. (PMID: 27099653)
      Springerplus. 2016 Jun 22;5(1):835. (PMID: 27386284)
      Neurochem Res. 2017 Jun;42(6):1683-1696. (PMID: 27822667)
      J Hepatol. 2017 Feb;66(2):442-450. (PMID: 27984174)
      Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):281-288. (PMID: 28121521)
      Radiol Med. 2017 Sep;122(9):713-721. (PMID: 28510807)
      Br J Radiol. 2017 Jul;90(1075):20160875. (PMID: 28511589)
      World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 14;23(26):4779-4787. (PMID: 28765699)
      AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Nov;209(5):1128-1135. (PMID: 28813200)
      J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018 Aug;102(4):853-860. (PMID: 29671905)
      Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 May 24;11:193-215. (PMID: 29872332)
      J Hepatol. 2018 Oct;69(4):905-915. (PMID: 29981428)
      J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;34(1):31-39. (PMID: 30070387)
      Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018 Aug;35(3):206-214. (PMID: 30087525)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Hepatic encephalopathy; Portal hypertension; Portal vein branch; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20190314 Date Completed: 20190416 Latest Revision: 20200225
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC6406189
    • Accession Number:
      10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1088
    • Accession Number:
      30862997