How states tighten control: a field theory perspective on journalism in contemporary Crimea.

Publisher: published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0373126 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-4446 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00071315 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Br J Sociol Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: London : published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science
Original Publication: London, Published by Routledge & Kegan Paul for London, London School of Economics and Political Science.

Government* ; Mass Media* ; Social Change*; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Politics ; Professional Autonomy ; Russia

This article contributes to denationalizing Bourdieu's field theory by analysing the relationship between a regional news media field, the state and transnational influences. The article seeks to answer the question of how a state can impose limits on the autonomy of the news media field during political transition. Field theory is applied to changes that have taken place in Crimean news media since Russia's annexation of the peninsula in 2014. Drawing on narrative interviews with journalists who worked in Crimea in 2012-17, expert interviews, and secondary sources, I demonstrate how Crimea's news media field went from being dominated by varied Ukrainian private news media owners to becoming dominated by the Russian state. I show that states can employ direct measures such as anti-press violence and ownership appropriation of news media outlets in order to increase concentration of state media ownership. In addition, states can reallocate capital in the news media field, disenfranchising some journalists and outlets while favouring others. The adaptive strategies of individual journalists, who, upon losing capital, can sometimes relocate or leave their jobs, also changes the composition of news media fields. Departing from a common view of social spaces as bounded within nation-states, I examine how the news media field of Crimea has been shaped by both transnational influences, and by the direct imposition of Russian state power through a reconstitution of national borders.
(© London School of Economics and Political Science 2018.)

Bagdikian, B.H. 1980 ‘Conglomeration, Concentration, and the Media’, Journal of Communication 30(2): 59-64.
Benson, R. 1999 ‘Field Theory in Comparative Context: A New Paradigm for Media Studies’, Theory and Society 28(3): 463-98.
Benson, R. 2006 ‘News Media as a “Journalistic Field”: What Bourdieu Adds to New Institutionalism, and Vice Versa’, Political Communication 23(2): 187-202.
Benson, R. 2009 ‘What Makes News More Multiperspectival? A Field Analysis’, Poetics 37(5-6): 402-18.
Benson, R. 2013 Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Benson, R. and Neveu, E. 2005 Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benson, R. and Saguy, A. 2005 ‘Constructing Social Problems in an Age of Globalization: A French-American Comparison’, American Sociological Review 70(2): 233-59.
Biersack, J. and O’Lear, S. 2014 ‘The Geopolitics of Russia’s Annexation of Crimea: Narratives, Identity, Silences, and Energy’, Eurasian Geography and Economics 55(3): 247-69.
Bourdieu, P. 1995 Sociology in Question, London: SAGE Publications [first published Les Éditions de Minuit, 1984].
Bourdieu, P. 1998 On Television and Journalism, London: Pluto Press [first published Liber-Raisons d’agir, 1996].
Bourdieu, P. 2014 On the State, Cambridge: Polity Press [first published Éditions Raisons d’Agir/Editions du Seuil, 2012].
Bourdieu, P. 1996 The State Nobility, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press [first published Les Éditions de Minuit, 1989].
Bourdieu, P. 1999 Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [first published Librairie Droz S.A., 1972].
Buchholz, L. 2016 ‘What Is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields beyond the Nation-state’, Sociological Review Monographs 64(2): 31-60.
Bühlmann, F., David, T. and Mach, A. 2013 ‘Cosmopolitan Capital and the Internationalization of the Field of Business Elites: Evidence from the Swiss Case’, Cultural Sociology 7(2): 211-29.
Champagne, P. 2005 ‘The “Double Dependency”: The Journalistic Field between Politics and Markets’, in R.Benson and E.Neveu (eds.) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Couldry, N. 2007 ‘Bourdieu and the Media: The Promise and Limits of Field Theory’, Theory and Society 36(2): 209-13.
Couldry, N. 2003 ‘Media, Symbolic Power and the Limits of Bourdieu’s Field Theory’, Media@LSE electronic working papers, 2. Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaWorkingPapers/pdf/EWP02.pdf [Accessed on 10 June 2018].
Davis, A. and Seymour, E. 2010 ‘Generating Forms of Media Capital Inside and Outside a Field: The Strange Case of David Cameron in the UK Political Field’, Media, Culture & Society 32(5): 739-59.
Dezalay, G. 2002 Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Fligstein, N. 2008 Euroclash, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Granina, V. 2007 ‘Politicheskiy media resurs. Chast' 1, Partiya regionov’, Vovremya.info. Available at: https://vovremya.info/art/1189609950.html [Accessed on 23 January 2017].
Ishkanian, A. 2016 ‘Challenging the Gospel of Neoliberalism? Civil Society Opposition to Mining in Armenia’, in T. Davies, H.E. Ryan and A.M. Peña (eds) Protest, Social Movements, and Global Democracy since 2011: New Perspectives, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Marlière, P. 1998 ‘The Rules of the Journalistic Field: Pierre Bourdieu’s Contribution to the Sociology of the Media’, European Journal of Communication 13(2): 219-34.
McChesney, R. 2015 Rich Media, Poor Democracy, New York: The New Press.
Medialogiya 2017 ‘Medialogiya regional media rating’. Available at: https://www.mlg.ru/ratings/regional_media/4481/39/2016/3/ [Accessed on 23 January 2017].
Migdal, J. 2009 State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitzen, J. 2006 ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 341-70.
Murdock, G. 1994 ‘The New Mogul Empires: Media Concentration and Control in the Age of Divergence’, Media Development 61(4): 3-6.
Nazarov, M.M. 2018 Massovaya kommunikatsiiya i obshchestvo: Vvedenie v teoriyu i issledovianiya, Moskva: URSS.
Phillips, S.D. 2008 Women’s Social Activism in the New Ukraine: Development and the Politics of Differentiation, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Regional programme 'Obshchestvennoe mnenie 2012 ‘Media Monitoring’, 17-23 September 2012: 64-65.
Richeri, G. 2011 ‘The Media amid Enterprises, the Public, and the State: New Challenges for Research’, in J.Watsko, G.Murdock and H.Sousa (eds) The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Russell, A. 2007 ‘Digital Communication Networks and the Journalistic Field: The 2005 French Riots’, Critical Studies in Media Communication 24(4): 285-302.
Savage, M. and Silva, E.B. 2013 ‘Field Analysis in Cultural Sociology’, Cultural Sociology 7(2): 111-26.
Schinkel, W. 2015 ‘The Sociologist and the State: An Assessment of Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 66(2): 215-35.
Skibo, D. (2017) ‘Five Years of Russia’s Foreign Agent Law’, OpendDemocracy, Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/daria-skibo/five-years-of-russia-s-foreign-agent-law [Accessed on 1 June 2018].
Sklair, L. 2001 The Transnational Capitalist Class, New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Suslov, M.D. 2015 ‘Crimea Is Ours! Russian Popular Geopolitics in the New Media Age’, Eurasian Geography and Economics 55(6): 588-609.
Teper, Y. 2015 ‘Official Russian Identity Discourse in Light of the Annexation of Crimea: National or Imperial?’, Post-Soviet Affairs 32(4): 1-19.
Tuathail, G.O. 2008 ‘Understanding Critical Geopolitics: Geopolitics and Risk Society’, Journal of Strategic Studies 22(1-3): 107-24.
Zvereva, V.V. 2012 ‘Nastoyashchaya zhizn’ v televizore: Issledovaniya sovremennoi mediakultury, Moskva: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet.

National Research University Higher School of Economics; Newnham College, University of Cambridge; University of Cambridge

Keywords: Russia; Sociology of journalism; Ukraine; field theory; media; news media

Date Created: 20181027 Date Completed: 20200309 Latest Revision: 20200309

20231215

10.1111/1468-4446.12615

30362113