Dyadic invariance of the Adult Self-Report and Adult Behavior Checklist: Evidence from young adult romantic couples.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8915253 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1939-134X (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10403590 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Psychol Assess Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Arlington, VA : American Psychological Association, [c1989-
    • Subject Terms:
      Interpersonal Relations* ; Self Report* ; Surveys and Questionnaires*; Problem Behavior/*psychology ; Sexual Partners/*psychology; Adolescent ; Adult ; Checklist ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Psychometrics ; Young Adult
    • Abstract:
      The current paper investigated the invariance of the behavior problem scales of two measures from the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, the Adult Self Report (ASR) and the Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL), across members of young adult romantic couples. Data were derived from three studies examining romantic relationships in young adulthood (total N = 672). Using a series of confirmatory factor analysis models, we tested levels of invariance of the behavior problem subscales of the ASR/ABCL across self- and partner-reports. All behavior problem subscales demonstrated invariant factor structures across self- and partner-reports. However, only the attention problems, aggressive behavior, and rule-breaking subscales achieved full metric invariance for both men and women. The intrusiveness (for men) and somatic complaints (for women) subscales also met full metric invariance. The remaining subscales only met partial metric invariance for both men (withdrawn, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints) and women (withdrawn, anxious/depressed, intrusiveness). All subscales only met partial scalar invariance. The current study extends the literature on cross-informant assessments by moving beyond studies of mean differences or correlations between informant reports. Moreover, our findings indicate that understanding agreement between informants should include multiple levels of measurement, such as factor structure, factor loadings, and item means. We recommend careful consideration of these issues when using the ASR/ABCL in a cross-informant framework. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20181026 Date Completed: 20190403 Latest Revision: 20201210
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      10.1037/pas0000658
    • Accession Number:
      30359049