Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.

Publisher: American Society for Microbiology Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7605801 Publication Model: Electronic-Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1098-5336 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00992240 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Appl Environ Microbiol Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: Washington, American Society for Microbiology.

Bathing Beaches* ; Water Microbiology*; Enterococcus/*isolation & purification ; Fresh Water/*microbiology ; Seawater/*microbiology ; Water Pollution/*analysis; Enterococcus/classification ; Enterococcus/genetics ; Environmental Monitoring/methods ; Estuaries ; Feces/microbiology ; Geologic Sediments/microbiology ; Maine ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics ; Water Quality

Fecal pollution at coastal beaches requires management efforts to address public health and economic concerns. Feces-borne bacterial concentrations are influenced by different fecal sources, environmental conditions, and ecosystem reservoirs, making their public health significance convoluted. In this study, we sought to delineate the influences of these factors on enterococcal concentrations in southern Maine coastal recreational waters. Weekly water samples and water quality measurements were conducted at freshwater, estuarine, and marine beach sites from June through September 2016. The samples were analyzed for total and particle-associated enterococcal concentrations, total suspended solids, and microbial source tracking markers (PCR: Bac32, HF183, CF128, DF475, and Gull2; quantitative PCR [qPCR]: AllBac, HF183, and GFD). Water, soil, sediment, and marine sediment samples were also subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing and SourceTracker analysis to determine the influence from these environmental reservoirs on water sample microbial communities. Enterococcal and particle-associated enterococcal concentrations were elevated in freshwater, but the concentrations of suspended solids were relatively similar. Mammal fecal contamination was significantly elevated in the estuary, with human and bird fecal contaminant levels similar between sites. A partial least-squares regression model indicated particle-associated enterococcal and mammal marker concentrations had the most significant positive relationships with enterococcal concentrations across marine, estuary, and freshwater environments. Freshwater microbial communities were significantly influenced by underlying sediment, while estuarine/marine beach communities were influenced by freshwater, high tide height, and estuarine sediment. Elevated enterococcal levels were reflective of a combination of increased fecal source input, environmental sources, and environmental conditions, highlighting the need for encompassing microbial source tracking (MST) approaches for managing water quality issues. IMPORTANCE Enterococci have long been the federal standard in determining water quality at estuarine and marine environments. Although enterococci are highly abundant in the intestines of many animals, they are not exclusive to that environment and can persist and grow outside fecal tracts. This presents a management problem for areas that are largely impaired by nonpoint source contamination, as fecal sources might not be the root cause of contamination. This study employed different microbial source tracking methods for delineating the influences from fecal source input, environmental sources, and environmental conditions to determine which combination of variables are influencing enterococcal concentrations in recreational waters at a historically impaired coastal town. The results showed that fecal source input, environmental sources, and conditions all play roles in influencing enterococcal concentrations. This highlights the need to include an encompassing microbial source tracking approach to assess the effects of all important variables on enterococcal concentrations.
(Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.)

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jul;74(13):3969-76. (PMID: 18469128)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72. (PMID: 16820507)
J Water Health. 2010 Jun;8(2):374-86. (PMID: 20154400)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3041-8. (PMID: 15933000)
J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(3):598-608. (PMID: 16108802)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1165-72. (PMID: 11872464)
J Appl Microbiol. 1998 Dec;85 Suppl 1:83S-89S. (PMID: 21182696)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Aug;81(15):4904-13. (PMID: 25979888)
Water Res. 2010 Feb;44(4):1182-92. (PMID: 19084252)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3179-83. (PMID: 15933019)
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4828-37. (PMID: 19631958)
Syst Appl Microbiol. 2010 Oct;33(6):348-57. (PMID: 20655680)
Environ Microbiol. 2010 May;12(5):1271-81. (PMID: 20192964)
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4838-49. (PMID: 19604534)
Microb Ecol. 2016 May;71(4):814-24. (PMID: 26879939)
Water Res. 2014 Dec 1;66:254-264. (PMID: 25222329)
Water Environ Res. 2017 Feb 1;89(2):127-143. (PMID: 28160781)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):4214-24. (PMID: 16751534)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Sep;76(17):5802-14. (PMID: 20639358)
Can J Public Health. 1984 Jan-Feb;75(1):49-56. (PMID: 6367923)
Epidemiology. 2007 Jan;18(1):27-35. (PMID: 17149140)
Water Res. 2005 May;39(9):1773-82. (PMID: 15899275)
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20. (PMID: 24695404)
ISME J. 2012 Aug;6(8):1621-4. (PMID: 22402401)
Water Res. 2011 Jan;45(2):872-8. (PMID: 20950837)
Nat Methods. 2011 Jul 17;8(9):761-3. (PMID: 21765408)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;78(8):2569-77. (PMID: 22327586)
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4908-17. (PMID: 19818987)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Sep;73(18):5840-7. (PMID: 17644647)
J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(4):557-65. (PMID: 12234338)
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6. (PMID: 20383131)
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 15;114:470-5. (PMID: 23186726)
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 1;44(21):8175-81. (PMID: 20925349)
Water Res. 2017 Jan 1;108:330-338. (PMID: 27847149)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Oct;66(10):4571-4. (PMID: 11010920)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Apr;66(4):1587-94. (PMID: 10742246)
Microb Ecol. 2013 May;65(4):1011-23. (PMID: 23475306)
Water Res. 2009 Nov;43(19):4812-9. (PMID: 19595426)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jan;78(2):503-10. (PMID: 22081573)
Water Res. 2009 Mar;43(4):1137-49. (PMID: 19118856)
Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;9(8):2038-49. (PMID: 17635548)
Water Res. 2010 Sep;44(16):4674-91. (PMID: 20656314)
Water Res. 2011 Aug;45(14):4081-91. (PMID: 21689838)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Aug;81(15):5134-43. (PMID: 26002900)
Water Res. 2014 Dec 15;67:105-17. (PMID: 25262555)
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014 Jan;38(1):1-40. (PMID: 23815638)
Environ Int. 2018 Aug;117:243-249. (PMID: 29772486)
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6883-96. (PMID: 23916157)
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6839-48. (PMID: 23911226)
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012 Dec;76(4):685-706. (PMID: 23204362)
Water Res. 2016 Jan 1;88:613-622. (PMID: 26562798)
Microbes Environ. 2012;27(2):164-70. (PMID: 22791049)
Water Res. 2013 Nov 15;47(18):6909-20. (PMID: 23916711)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22. (PMID: 20534432)
J Environ Qual. 2005 Mar-Apr;34(2):581-9. (PMID: 15758111)
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Aug;72(8):5537-46. (PMID: 16885307)

Keywords: coastal ecosystem; enterococci; fecal pollution; microbial source tracking

0 (RNA, Ribosomal, 16S)

Date Created: 20180715 Date Completed: 20190930 Latest Revision: 20190930

20221213

PMC6102982

10.1128/AEM.01038-18

30006393