[Occupational health risk assessment of coal dust in coal industry chain].

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Han F;Han F; Chen YQ; Wu B; Kang N; Zhang SY
  • Source:
    Zhonghua lao dong wei sheng zhi ye bing za zhi = Zhonghua laodong weisheng zhiyebing zazhi = Chinese journal of industrial hygiene and occupational diseases [Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi] 2018 Apr 20; Vol. 36 (4), pp. 291-294.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    Chinese
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng yan jiu suo ; Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng huan jing yi xue hui Country of Publication: China NLM ID: 8410840 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1001-9391 (Print) Linking ISSN: 10019391 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: [Tientsin] : Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng yan jiu suo ; Tianjin shi lao dong wei sheng huan jing yi xue hui, [1983-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Objective: To grasp the present situation of occupational hazards of coal dust in our country, understand our country coal dust workers' occupational health risks, provide information based on evidence and analysis for the government and organize to effectively deal with the current status of high coal workers pneumoconiosis incidence in China, and protect coal dust workers' occupational health. Methods: The research object is the " mining-transportation-use" of coal industrial chain, referring to 33 units. Use field investigation to obtain the coal dust exposure, dust prevention measures and the occupational health data of study object. Use quantitative evaluation method of International council on mining and metals occupational health risk assessment model (ICMM method) and occupational hazard risk index method (index method) , with coal workers pneumoconiosis as health outcomes, to evaluate the coal dust occupational health risks of coal industrial chain. Results: The free silica content of partial coal dust in China is more than 10%, and even to 19.5%. coal dust concentration in workplaces, such as excavating system of dust coal mining (total dust: 22.1~46.5 mg/m(3), respiratory dust: 8.4~17.7 mg/m(3)) , dumper (total dust: 25.2 mg/m(3), respiratory dust: 6.9 mg/m(3)) , transfer tower (total dust: 35.4 mg/m(3)) of coal transportation and belt coal plough device of coal use (total dust: 36.3 mg/m(3), respiratory dust: 14.0 mg/m(3)) , are much higher than those in other workplaces, and coal dust concentration of workers in these places (2.6~9.3 mg/m(3)) are much higher than those in other places, which are statistically significant. ICMM method evaluation results show that the risk value of excavating system is between 504~1 089, and the risk value of comprehensive mining system is between 347~2 040, which are far statistically significant higher than that of other systems. Index method evaluation results (excavating system risk value between 3.1~9.7, fully mechanized system risk value between 3.7~9.3) , are basically identical with ICMM method (correlation coefficient r =0.857, P <0.01) . The new cases of coal worker pneumoconiosis are distributed in three post of coal mining, excavating and coal mine mixing. Conclusion: Coal-dust hazards are widely distributed in the coal "mining, transportation, and use" industrial chain, which of the underground coal mine is as serious as intolerable, meanwhile the risk of other industrial chain is basically can tolerable. The high coal dust concentration and the high risk of coal dust occupational hazard are concentrated in the excavating system and the comprehensive mining system. It is recommended to start the study on risk assessment and risk response of coal dust health hazard at the national level, and the occupational exposure limit of coal dust should be established according to the content of free silica.
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Coal dust; Coal industry chain; Occupational health; Risk assessment.
      Local Abstract: [Publisher, Chinese] 目的: 掌握我国煤尘的职业危害现状,了解我国煤尘作业人员的煤尘职业健康风险,为有效地应对煤工尘肺发病现状提供信息。 方法: 2015年4月,以煤炭"开采-运输-使用"产业链共33家企业为研究对象,通过现场调查其煤尘暴露水平、防尘措施和职业健康监护等资料,应用国际采矿与金属委员会(International council on mining and metals,ICMM)职业健康风险评估模型中的定量评估(简称ICMM法)和职业危害风险指数法(简称指数法),以煤工尘肺为健康结局,评估煤炭产业链的煤尘职业健康风险。 结果: 本次研究显示煤尘中游离二氧化硅含量在部分煤种中超过10%,最高可达19.5%。煤炭开采环节的掘进系统(总尘22.1~46.5 mg/m(3),呼尘8.4~17.7 mg/m(3))、煤炭运输环节的翻车机(总尘25.2 mg/m(3),呼尘6.9 mg/m(3))、转接塔(总尘35.4 mg/m(3))和煤炭使用环节的皮带犁煤器(总尘36.3 mg/m(3),呼尘14.0 mg/m(3))等工作场所空气中煤尘浓度远高于其他工作场所,且这些场所煤尘作业人员岗位呼尘浓度(2.6~9.3 mg/m(3))也远高于其他系统的岗位,差异有统计学意义( P <0.01)。ICMM法评估结果显示,掘进系统风险值504~1 089,综采系统风险值347~2 040,远高于其他系统,差异有统计学意义,与指数法的风险评估结果(掘进系统风险值3.1~9.7,综采系统风险值3.7~9.3),基本一致(相关系数 r =0.857, P <0.01)。煤工尘肺新发病例均分布在综采和掘进系统的采煤工、掘进工和煤矿混合工3个工种。 结论: 煤尘危害广泛分布于在煤炭"开采-运输-使用"产业链中,煤矿井下作业职业危害严重。煤尘浓度和煤尘职业健康风险较高的环节均集中于煤炭开采的掘进系统和综采系统。建议加强煤尘健康职业危害风险评估及风险应对研究。.
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Coal)
      0 (Dust)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20180712 Date Completed: 20181018 Latest Revision: 20181023
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2018.04.015
    • Accession Number:
      29996254