Is more better? Examining whether enhanced consultation/coaching improves implementation.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0400640 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1939-0025 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00029432 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Am J Orthopsychiatry Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: 2014- : Washington, DC : American Psychological Association
      Original Publication: Menasha, Wis., American Orthopsychiatric Assn.
    • Subject Terms:
      Adolescent Health Services*/standards ; Ambulatory Care*/standards ; Child Health Services*/standards ; Education, Nonprofessional*/standards ; Evidence-Based Practice*/standards ; Foster Home Care*/standards ; Group Homes*/standards ; Mental Health Services*/standards ; Referral and Consultation*/standards; Health Personnel/*education; Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Southeastern United States
    • Abstract:
      It is extremely challenging to implement evidence-based interventions in community-based agencies with sufficient quality, fidelity, and intensity to produce desired changes in practice and outcomes. This is particularly difficult to do within the confines of existing service providers' time, personnel, and resource constraints. Over the past 15 years, Together Facing the Challenge (TFTC) has been developed, tested, and disseminated in an effort to address this set of issues to improve treatment foster care (TFC). Data from the initial randomized trial showed improved practice and outcomes in TFTC compared to usual TFC. These initial results came from study-led training and follow-up consultation. Subsequent dissemination activities suggested potential need for more intensive support for TFTC supervisors to produce more consistent and sustained implementation of the model. The current randomized trial extends this work by comparing the previously tested standard consultation versus enhanced consultation that incorporated more of a coaching approach. Initial results suggest that enhanced coaching/consultation was associated with improvements in the small- to medium-effect size range. Results are promising, but require additional work to more fully understand how and whether to enhance supports as agencies implement new evidence-based approaches. (PsycINFO Database Record
      ((c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).)
    • Grant Information:
      Duke Endowment
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20180123 Date Completed: 20190201 Latest Revision: 20190201
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1037/ort0000296
    • Accession Number:
      29355361