The safety attitudes questionnaire in Chinese: psychometric properties and benchmarking data of the safety culture in Beijing hospitals.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: In China, increasing attention has been devoted to the patient safety culture within health administrative departments and healthcare organizations. However, no official version of a patient safety culture assessment tool has been published or is widely used, and little is known about the status of the safety culture in Chinese hospitals. The aims of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire in Chinese and to establish benchmark data on the safety culture in Beijing.
      Methods: Across-sectional survey on patient safety culture was conducted from August to October 2014 using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire in Chinese. Using a stratified random sampling method, we investigated departments from five integrative teaching hospitals in Beijing; frontline healthcare workers in each unit participated in the survey on a voluntary basis. The internal consistency and reliability were tested via Cronbach's alpha, and the structural validity of the questionnaire was tested using a correlation analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The patient safety culture in the five hospitals was assessed and analyzed.
      Results: A total of 1663 valid questionnaires were returned, for a response rate of 87.9%. Cronbach's alpha of the total scale was 0.945, and Cronbach's alpha for the six dimensions ranged from 0.785 to 0.899. The goodness-of-fit indices in the confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable but not ideal model fit. The safety attitude score of healthcare workers in the five hospitals was 69.72, and the positive response rate was 38.57% overall. The positive response rates of the six dimensions were between 20.80% and 59.31%.
      Conclusions: The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire in Chinese has good internal consistency, and the structural validity and reliability are acceptable. This questionnaire can be used to assess the safety culture in Beijing hospitals, but some items require further refinement. The patient safety culture in Beijing hospitals must be improved in certain key areas.
    • References:
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:234. (PMID: 20698965)
      Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Jun;22(3):151-61. (PMID: 20382662)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jul 08;10:199. (PMID: 20615247)
      J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):156-65. (PMID: 20618600)
      BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1154-7. (PMID: 9552960)
      Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec;43(6):2050-66. (PMID: 18671751)
      BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):847-56. (PMID: 24736029)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 03;6:44. (PMID: 16584553)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):1-5. (PMID: 17351834)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2:ii17-23. (PMID: 14645891)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:191. (PMID: 18808693)
      BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):745-9. (PMID: 10720356)
      JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8. (PMID: 3045356)
      J Pers Assess. 2003 Feb;80(1):99-103. (PMID: 12584072)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):826-32. (PMID: 20386996)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):547-54. (PMID: 21127113)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr 11;5(1):28. (PMID: 15823204)
      Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):369-74. (PMID: 23460092)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):346-50. (PMID: 20693223)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):417-21. (PMID: 16326787)
      Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;204(3):216.e1-6. (PMID: 21376160)
      BMJ. 2011 Feb 03;342:d195. (PMID: 21292719)
      BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jul 31;6:302. (PMID: 23902850)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):572-7. (PMID: 20671082)
      J Evid Based Med. 2013 Feb;6(1):43-9. (PMID: 23557527)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):112-8. (PMID: 12679507)
      J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):135-42. (PMID: 24583952)
      Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;44(2 Pt 1):399-421. (PMID: 19178583)
      J Interprof Care. 2006 Oct;20(5):461-70. (PMID: 17000472)
      Am J Crit Care. 2013 Mar;22(2):93-102. (PMID: 23455858)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 24;15:284. (PMID: 26204957)
      BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Apr 11;10:8. (PMID: 20380741)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6. (PMID: 16195571)
      BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):11-8. (PMID: 22849965)
      J Patient Saf. 2010 Dec;6(4):226-32. (PMID: 21099551)
      Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):311-20. (PMID: 22687703)
      Am J Med Qual. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):311-8. (PMID: 17804390)
      Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5. (PMID: 3640358)
      BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 19;13:104. (PMID: 23506044)
    • Contributed Indexing:
      Keywords: Cross-sectional survey; Patient safety; Reliability; Safety attitudes questionnaire; Safety culture; Validity
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20170824 Date Completed: 20180402 Latest Revision: 20181202
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC5568263
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/s12913-017-2543-2
    • Accession Number:
      28830416