Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women's and men's perceptions.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101170481 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1478-4505 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14784505 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Health Res Policy Syst Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2003-

Science* ; Sexism* ; Women's Rights*; Men/*psychology ; Women/*psychology; Attitude ; Career Mobility ; Communication ; England ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Perception ; Research Support as Topic ; Salaries and Fringe Benefits

Background: While in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Australia, higher education and research institutions are widely engaged with the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science to advance gender equality, empirical research on this process and its impact is rare. This study combined two data sets (free- text comments from a survey and qualitative interviews) to explore the range of experiences and perceptions of participation in Athena SWAN in medical science departments of a research-intensive university in Oxford, United Kingdom.
Methods: The study is based on the secondary analysis of data from two projects: 59 respondents to an anonymous online survey (42 women, 17 men) provided relevant free-text comments and, separately, 37 women participated in face-to-face narrative interviews. Free-text survey comments and narrative interviews were analysed thematically using constant comparison.
Results: Both women and men said that participation in Athena SWAN had brought about important structural and cultural changes, including increased support for women's careers, greater appreciation of caring responsibilities, and efforts to challenge discrimination and bias. Many said that these positive changes would not have happened without linkage of Athena SWAN to government research funding, while others thought there were unintended consequences. Concerns about the programme design and implementation included a perception that Athena SWAN has limited ability to address longstanding and entrenched power and pay imbalances, persisting lack of work-life balance in academic medicine, questions about the sustainability of positive changes, belief that achieving the award could become an end in itself, resentment about perceived positive discrimination, and perceptions that further structural and cultural changes were needed in the university and wider society.
Conclusions: The findings from this study suggest that Athena SWAN has a positive impact in advancing gender equality, but there may be limits to how much it can improve gender equality without wider institutional and societal changes. To address the fundamental causes of gender inequality would require cultural change and welfare state policies incentivising men to increase their participation in unpaid work in the family, which is beyond the scope of higher education and research policy.

Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov;17(11):550-1. (PMID: 24176517)
Acad Med. 2009 Jan;84(1):67-79. (PMID: 19116480)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 25;111(12):4403-8. (PMID: 24616490)
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 08;6(9):e012090. (PMID: 27609850)
Nurse Res. 1997 May 1;4(3):17-30. (PMID: 27285771)
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 16;5(11):e009384. (PMID: 26576814)
J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):39-47. (PMID: 11224943)
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jul 19;14 (1):50. (PMID: 27432056)
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2948-2958. (PMID: 27105721)
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Jan 6;15(1):2. (PMID: 28061790)
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 27;5(3):e005845. (PMID: 25818268)
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 07;6(1):e009022. (PMID: 26743702)
Chemistry. 2016 Mar 7;22(11):3535-6. (PMID: 26865282)
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66. (PMID: 24411650)

Keywords: Athena SWAN; Gender equality; Health research; Science policy

Date Created: 20170223 Date Completed: 20170606 Latest Revision: 20181113

20221213

PMC5320775

10.1186/s12961-017-0177-9

28222735