Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
The unexpected discovery of Brucella abortus Buck 19 vaccine in goats from Ecuador underlines the importance of biosecurity measures.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 1277355 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1573-7438 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00494747 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Trop Anim Health Prod Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Publication: 2005- : Heidelberg : Springer
Original Publication: Edinburgh, Livingstone.
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Very few, mostly old, and only preliminary serological studies of brucellosis in goats exist in Ecuador. In order to assess the current epidemiological situation, we performed a cross-sectional serological study in the goat populations of Carchi (n = 160 animals), Pichincha (n = 224 animals), and Loja provinces (n = 2024 animals). Only two positive serological results (RB negative and SAT-EDTA ≥400 IU/ml) were obtained in lactating goats from the same farm in Quito (Pichincha province). Additionally, milk was sampled from 220 animals in Pichincha province. The present study indicates a low apparent prevalence in Pichincha province and absence in Carchi and Loja provinces. A total of 25 positive milk ring tests (MRT) were obtained in Pichincha province yielding a prevalence of MRT of 11.16%. Subsequent culture was performed on the positive MRT samples. All results were negative, apart from a single sample, obtained from a serologically positive goat in Quito, that was positive for Brucella abortus strain 19 (B19). Several hypotheses are forwarded concerning this unexpected result. The most likely hypothesis is the possible accidental use of a needle, previously used for vaccination of cattle with the said vaccine, for the administration of drug treatment to the goat. This hypothesis underlines the necessity of biosecurity measures to prevent this type of accidents.
- References:
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014 Apr;61(2):121-33. (PMID: 23046031)
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1640-2. (PMID: 7650203)
Am J Vet Res. 1983 Sep;44(9):1641-3. (PMID: 6414347)
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Apr;90(4):712-5. (PMID: 24591429)
Vet Microbiol. 2000 Jul 3;75(1):91-7. (PMID: 10865155)
Res Vet Sci. 1981 Nov;31(3):342-4. (PMID: 6805054)
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Nov;32(11):2660-6. (PMID: 7852552)
Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc. 1969;73:159-65. (PMID: 4993565)
Res Vet Sci. 1978 May;24(3):376-7. (PMID: 97740)
Braz J Microbiol. 2012 Apr;43(2):594-601. (PMID: 24031869)
Croat Med J. 2010 Aug;51(4):296-305. (PMID: 20718082)
- Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Biosecurity; Brucellosis; Ecuador; Goats; Vaccine
- Accession Number:
0 (Antibodies, Bacterial)
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20170205 Date Completed: 20170621 Latest Revision: 20201209
- Publication Date:
20240829
- Accession Number:
10.1007/s11250-017-1229-4
- Accession Number:
28160160
No Comments.