Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Piaget No 'Remedy' for Kuhn, But the Two Should be Read Together: Comment on Tsou's 'Piaget vs. Kuhn on Scientific Progress'.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
In arguing that the philosophical works of Jean Piaget could be used as a 'remedy' for the flaws in those of Thomas Kuhn, Tsou overlooked some crucial aspects of the problem: the early history between them, the biological foundation supporting Piaget's method, and a preexisting suggestion regarding the intended future extension of his work. There was also no mention of the existence of a 'lost' manuscript by Kuhn, which supposedly presents the mature articulation of his theory. This comment therefore proposes some 'friendly amendments' to Tsou's exposition, with a view to helping achieve his synthetic vision once the 'lost' work has finally been published. Yet the basic message, in anticipation of this future endeavor, is also exceedingly simple: the implicit direction of Piaget's (and Kuhn's) epistemological constructivism can be characterized as evolutionary-developmental 'progress from,' rather than vitalist-teleological 'progress toward.' [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Abstract:
Copyright of Theory & Psychology is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.