Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Failure to suppress low-frequency neuronal oscillatory activity underlies the reduced effectiveness of random patterns of deep brain stimulation.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- Additional Information
- Source:
Publisher: American Physiological Society Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0375404 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1522-1598 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00223077 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Neurophysiol Subsets: MEDLINE
- Publication Information:
Publication: Bethesda Md : American Physiological Society
Original Publication: Washington [etc.]
- Subject Terms:
- Abstract:
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the mechanisms of action of DBS are unknown. Random temporal patterns of DBS are less effective than regular DBS, but the neuronal basis for this dependence on temporal pattern of stimulation is unclear. Using a rat model of PD, we quantified the changes in behavior and single-unit activity in globus pallidus externa and substantia nigra pars reticulata during high-frequency STN DBS with different degrees of irregularity. Although all stimulus trains had the same average rate, 130-Hz regular DBS more effectively reversed motor symptoms, including circling and akinesia, than 130-Hz irregular DBS. A mixture of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal responses was present during all stimulation patterns, and mean firing rate did not change during DBS. Low-frequency (7-10 Hz) oscillations of single-unit firing times present in hemiparkinsonian rats were suppressed by regular DBS, and neuronal firing patterns were entrained to 130 Hz. Irregular patterns of DBS less effectively suppressed 7- to 10-Hz oscillations and did not regularize firing patterns. Random DBS resulted in a larger proportion of neuron pairs with increased coherence at 7-10 Hz compared with regular 130-Hz DBS, which suggested that long pauses (interpulse interval >50 ms) during random DBS facilitated abnormal low-frequency oscillations in the basal ganglia. These results suggest that the efficacy of high-frequency DBS stems from its ability to regularize patterns of neuronal firing and thereby suppress abnormal oscillatory neural activity within the basal ganglia.
(Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.)
- References:
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;85(4):1351-6. (PMID: 11287459)
Neuroreport. 2004 May 19;15(7):1137-40. (PMID: 15129161)
Neuron. 2011 Oct 20;72(2):370-84. (PMID: 22017994)
Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Aug;18(4):951-6. (PMID: 12925021)
Exp Neurol. 2011 Jun;229(2):517-21. (PMID: 21303674)
J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 18;24(33):7410-9. (PMID: 15317866)
J Neurosci. 2008 Jun 11;28(24):6165-73. (PMID: 18550758)
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013 Aug;13(8):371. (PMID: 23812894)
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Sep;20(5):626-35. (PMID: 22692937)
Neuroscience. 2002;115(4):1109-17. (PMID: 12453483)
Exp Neurol. 2010 Nov;226(1):120-7. (PMID: 20713047)
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1569-80. (PMID: 16738214)
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):364-83. (PMID: 21994263)
J Physiol. 2011 Sep 1;589(17):4189-207. (PMID: 21690190)
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2549-63. (PMID: 18768645)
Exp Neurol. 2008 May;211(1):243-51. (PMID: 18355810)
Exp Neurol. 2013 Sep;247:296-302. (PMID: 23399890)
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1941-60. (PMID: 19164104)
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jun;172(2):193-207. (PMID: 16369786)
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Aug;114(2):825-34. (PMID: 26084905)
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Nov;100(5):2807-18. (PMID: 18784271)
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 May;82(5):569-73. (PMID: 20935326)
J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 29;23(30):9929-36. (PMID: 14586023)
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1457-69. (PMID: 14668299)
Brain Res. 1970 Dec 18;24(3):485-93. (PMID: 5494536)
J Neurosci. 2003 Mar 1;23(5):1916-23. (PMID: 12629196)
Arch Neurol. 2004 Jan;61(1):89-96. (PMID: 14732625)
Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Jul;36(2):2240-51. (PMID: 22805068)
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Aug;104(2):911-21. (PMID: 20505125)
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):3662-9. (PMID: 16148275)
Mov Disord. 2010 Apr 15;25(5):578-86. (PMID: 20213817)
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 May;11(3):167-71. (PMID: 15823481)
Exp Neurol. 2009 Jan;215(1):20-8. (PMID: 18929561)
Neuropharmacology. 1986 Mar;25(3):323-5. (PMID: 3084991)
Front Syst Neurosci. 2011 Apr 26;5:21. (PMID: 21559345)
Brain. 2005 Oct;128(Pt 10):2372-82. (PMID: 16123144)
Neuroscience. 2000;99(2):289-95. (PMID: 10938434)
J Neurosci. 2008 Nov 12;28(46):11916-24. (PMID: 19005057)
Neuroreport. 2008 Mar 26;19(5):599-602. (PMID: 18388746)
J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 7;32(45):15657-68. (PMID: 23136407)
J Comput Neurosci. 2012 Jun;32(3):499-519. (PMID: 21984318)
Synapse. 2006 Jun 1;59(7):445-57. (PMID: 16521122)
- Grant Information:
R01 NS040894 United States NS NINDS NIH HHS; R37 NS040894 United States NS NINDS NIH HHS
- Contributed Indexing:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; deep brain stimulation; globus pallidus externa; substantia nigra pars reticulata; subthalamic nucleus
- Accession Number:
0 (Central Nervous System Stimulants)
0 (Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists)
44RAL3456C (Methamphetamine)
8HW4YBZ748 (Oxidopamine)
J6292F8L3D (Haloperidol)
- Publication Date:
Date Created: 20160311 Date Completed: 20170821 Latest Revision: 20181113
- Publication Date:
20231215
- Accession Number:
PMC4922603
- Accession Number:
10.1152/jn.00822.2015
- Accession Number:
26961105
No Comments.