Mixing Languages during Learning? Testing the One Subject-One Language Rule.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101285081 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1932-6203 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 19326203 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLoS One Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: San Francisco, CA : Public Library of Science
    • Subject Terms:
      Language* ; Learning* ; Multilingualism*; Adult ; Child ; Child Language ; Concept Formation ; Female ; Humans ; Language Development ; Male ; Memory ; Models, Theoretical ; Reaction Time ; Spain ; Young Adult
    • Abstract:
      In bilingual communities, mixing languages is avoided in formal schooling: even if two languages are used on a daily basis for teaching, only one language is used to teach each given academic subject. This tenet known as the one subject-one language rule avoids mixing languages in formal schooling because it may hinder learning. The aim of this study was to test the scientific ground of this assumption by investigating the consequences of acquiring new concepts using a method in which two languages are mixed as compared to a purely monolingual method. Native balanced bilingual speakers of Basque and Spanish-adults (Experiment 1) and children (Experiment 2)-learnt new concepts by associating two different features to novel objects. Half of the participants completed the learning process in a multilingual context (one feature was described in Basque and the other one in Spanish); while the other half completed the learning phase in a purely monolingual context (both features were described in Spanish). Different measures of learning were taken, as well as direct and indirect indicators of concept consolidation. We found no evidence in favor of the non-mixing method when comparing the results of two groups in either experiment, and thus failed to give scientific support for the educational premise of the one subject-one language rule.
    • References:
      Neuropsychologia. 2014 Apr;56:204-18. (PMID: 24480035)
      Mem Cognit. 2011 Feb;39(2):260-75. (PMID: 21264599)
      J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Nov;38(6):1720-30. (PMID: 22642236)
      J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1281-92. (PMID: 16393047)
      Biling (Camb Engl). 2012 Jul;15(3):594-615. (PMID: 25364296)
      Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):963-72. (PMID: 23483527)
      Brain Res. 2008 Dec 30;1246:123-35. (PMID: 18948089)
      Cogn Psychol. 2013 Mar;66(2):232-58. (PMID: 23370226)
      Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:142-54. (PMID: 20804744)
      J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Nov;23(11):3181-96. (PMID: 21452941)
      Appl Psycholinguist. 2014 Nov;35(6):1189-1211. (PMID: 29527076)
      Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009 Dec;10(3):89-129. (PMID: 26168404)
      Cogn Psychol. 1989 Jan;21(1):60-99. (PMID: 2920538)
      Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):418-25. (PMID: 23999407)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 24;104(30):12530-5. (PMID: 17630288)
      Psychophysiology. 2014 Apr;51(4):364-73. (PMID: 24660886)
      Learn Mem. 2009 Aug 25;16(9):509-13. (PMID: 19706833)
      Dev Sci. 2014 Jul;17(4):564-83. (PMID: 24576079)
      J Appl Psychol. 1967 Jun;51(3):300-4. (PMID: 6045637)
      J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 2;30(22):7646-51. (PMID: 20519539)
      J Child Lang. 1992 Oct;19(3):633-58. (PMID: 1429952)
      Exp Psychol. 2010;57(2):98-107. (PMID: 20178959)
      J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2973-87. (PMID: 10573909)
      Dev Sci. 2004 Jun;7(3):325-39. (PMID: 15595373)
      Biling (Camb Engl). 2008 Jul 1;11(2):203-223. (PMID: 19823598)
      Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3468-73. (PMID: 22155033)
      J Sch Psychol. 2012 Dec;50(6):737-58. (PMID: 23245498)
      J Child Lang. 2001 Jun;28(2):453-96. (PMID: 11449947)
      Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 15;2:188. (PMID: 21886634)
      Biling (Camb Engl). 2010 Jul 1;13(3):373-381. (PMID: 20676387)
      Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):705-10. (PMID: 19648456)
      Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):226-31. (PMID: 25058411)
      J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):640-65. (PMID: 19379041)
      Exp Psychol. 2014;61(3):234-51. (PMID: 24217139)
      Psychol Rev. 2003 Oct;110(4):762-84. (PMID: 14599242)
      Front Psychol. 2014 May 07;5:398. (PMID: 24847298)
      J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3125-34. (PMID: 7759652)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20150625 Date Completed: 20160405 Latest Revision: 20200306
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      PMC4479465
    • Accession Number:
      10.1371/journal.pone.0130069
    • Accession Number:
      26107624