Group Virtue: The Importance of Morality (vs. Competence and Sociability) in the Positive Evaluation of In-Groups.

SMALL group research; SOCIAL sciences & ethics; SOCIAL values; VIRTUES; SOCIAL groups; CULTURAL competence; SOCIABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY

Although previous research has focused on competence and sociability as the characteristics most important to positive group evaluation, the authors suggest that morality is more important. Studies with preexisting and experimentally created in groups showed that a set of positive traits constituted distinct factors of morality, competence, and sociability. When asked directly, Study 1 participants reported that their in-group's morality was more important than its competence or sociability, An unobtrusive factor analytic method also showed morality to be a more important explanation of positive in group evaluation than competence or sociability, Experimental manipulations of morality and competence (Study 4) and morality and sociability (Study 5) showed that only in-group morality affected aspects of the group-level self-concept related to positive evaluation (i.e., pride in. or distancing from, the in-group). Consistent with this finding, identification with experimentally created (Study 2b) and preexisting (Studies 4 and 5) in-groups predicted the ascription of morality, but not competence or sociability, to the in-group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Personality & Social Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)