Frontal-temporal synchronization of EEG signals quantified by order patterns cross recurrence analysis during propofol anesthesia.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Author(s): Shalbaf R; Behnam H; Sleigh JW; Steyn-Ross DA; Steyn-Ross ML
  • Source:
    IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society [IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng] 2015 May; Vol. 23 (3), pp. 468-74. Date of Electronic Publication: 2014 Aug 22.
  • Publication Type:
    Journal Article
  • Language:
    English
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: IEEE Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101097023 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1558-0210 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15344320 NLM ISO Abbreviation: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Piscataway, NJ : IEEE, c2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Characterizing brain dynamics during anesthesia is a main current challenge in anesthesia study. Several single channel electroencephalogram (EEG)-based commercial monitors like the Bispectral index (BIS) have suggested to examine EEG signal. But, the BIS index has obtained numerous critiques. In this study, we evaluate the concentration-dependent effect of the propofol on long-range frontal-temporal synchronization of EEG signals collected from eight subjects during a controlled induction and recovery design. We used order patterns cross recurrence plot and provide an index named order pattern laminarity (OPL) to assess changes in neuronal synchronization as the mechanism forming the foundation of conscious perception. The prediction probability of 0.9 and 0.84 for OPL and BIS specified that the OPL index correlated more strongly with effect-site propofol concentration. Also, our new index makes faster reaction to transients in EEG recordings based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model parameters and demonstrates less variability at the point of loss of consciousness (standard deviation of 0.04 for OPL compared with 0.09 for BIS index). The result show that the OPL index can estimate anesthetic state of patient more efficiently than the BIS index in lightly sedated state with more tolerant of artifacts.
    • Accession Number:
      0 (Anesthetics, Intravenous)
      YI7VU623SF (Propofol)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20140828 Date Completed: 20160209 Latest Revision: 20150513
    • Publication Date:
      20221213
    • Accession Number:
      10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2350537
    • Accession Number:
      25163065