Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: evidence from a remote culture.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101125678 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1931-1516 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15283542 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Emotion Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, c2001-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      It is widely believed that certain emotions are universally recognized in facial expressions. Recent evidence indicates that Western perceptions (e.g., scowls as anger) depend on cues to U.S. emotion concepts embedded in experiments. Because such cues are standard features in methods used in cross-cultural experiments, we hypothesized that evidence of universality depends on this conceptual context. In our study, participants from the United States and the Himba ethnic group from the Keunene region of northwestern Namibia sorted images of posed facial expressions into piles by emotion type. Without cues to emotion concepts, Himba participants did not show the presumed "universal" pattern, whereas U.S. participants produced a pattern with presumed universal features. With cues to emotion concepts, participants in both cultures produced sorts that were closer to the presumed "universal" pattern, although substantial cultural variation persisted. Our findings indicate that perceptions of emotion are not universal, but depend on cultural and conceptual contexts.
    • References:
      Nature. 2010 May 27;465(7297):412-5. (PMID: 20505706)
      Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Jun;23(3):361-72. (PMID: 23352202)
      Emotion. 2012 Jun;12(3):413-29. (PMID: 22642358)
      Brain Cogn. 2009 Aug;70(3):247-52. (PMID: 19339096)
      Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):763-84. (PMID: 16187859)
      Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):394-421. (PMID: 20371374)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7241-4. (PMID: 22509011)
      Psychol Bull. 2002 Mar;128(2):203-35. (PMID: 11931516)
      Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1222-6. (PMID: 19251631)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 9;107(6):2408-12. (PMID: 20133790)
      Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;1(1):28-58. (PMID: 26151184)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971 Feb;17(2):124-9. (PMID: 5542557)
      Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. (PMID: 26162106)
      Cogn Psychol. 2010 Jun;60(4):267-90. (PMID: 20156620)
      J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Apr;90(4):543-55. (PMID: 16649854)
      Emotion. 2012 Apr;12(2):314-25. (PMID: 22309717)
      J Neurosci Methods. 2002 Apr 15;115(2):137-43. (PMID: 11992665)
      Emotion. 2010 Oct;10(5):651-61. (PMID: 21038948)
      Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Nov;16(11):533-40. (PMID: 23036719)
      Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Jun;35(3):121-43. (PMID: 22617651)
      Cognition. 1999 May 3;71(1):1-42. (PMID: 10394708)
      Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jul;11(7):843-50. (PMID: 18552843)
      Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):125-38. (PMID: 16637756)
      Mem Cognit. 2007 Oct;35(7):1814-29. (PMID: 18062556)
      Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):3050-9. (PMID: 22019857)
      Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):1105-1127. (PMID: 21192959)
      J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8481-8. (PMID: 20573895)
      Psychol Bull. 1994 Mar;115(2):288-99. (PMID: 8165273)
      PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26337. (PMID: 22046275)
      Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jul;4(4):326-39. (PMID: 19844601)
      Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):898-906. (PMID: 21824027)
    • Grant Information:
      DP1 OD003312 United States OD NIH HHS; DP1OD003312 United States OD NIH HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20140409 Date Completed: 20140730 Latest Revision: 20211021
    • Publication Date:
      20240829
    • Accession Number:
      PMC4752367
    • Accession Number:
      10.1037/a0036052
    • Accession Number:
      24708506