Enteropathogen co-infection in UK cats with diarrhoea.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101249759 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1746-6148 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17466148 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Vet Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, 2005-
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      Background: Individual enteropathogen infections in healthy and clinically ill cats are well described, but prevalence and patterns of enteropathogen co-infection have only been reported on a limited basis. We studied enteropathogen co-infection in diarrhoeic UK cats using results of a real time PCR assay for 8 enteropathogenic species; feline coronavirus (Co), feline panleukopenia virus (Pa), Clostridium perfringens (Cl), Salmonella enterica (Sa), Giardia spp. (Gi), Tritrichomonas foetus (Tr), Cryptosporidium spp. (Cr), and Toxoplasma gondii (To). Age, gender, breed and history were recorded. PCR panels from 1088 diarrhoeic cats were available for analysis.
      Results: Overall enteropathogen prevalence was 56.9% (Co), 22.1% (Pa), 56.6% (Cl), 0.8% (Sa), 20.6% (Gi), 18.8% (Tr), 24.4% (Cr) and 1.0% (To). Prevalence of Co, Gi and Tr was higher in pedigree cats compared to non-pedigree cats (DSH) and prevalence decreased with increasing age for Co, Pa, Gi, Cr and Tr. Co-infection was common: ≥2 enteropathogens were detected in 62.5% of cats, and 13.3% of cats had ≥4 enteropathogens. Mean ( x¯) enteropathogen co-infection 2.01 (±1.3 SD), was significantly higher in pedigree cats ( x¯ =2.51) compared to DSH ( x¯ =1.68) and decreased with age ( x¯ =2.64 <6 months, x¯ =1.68 for >1 yr). More cats were negative for all 8 enteropathogens tested (12.7%) than expected. When exact combinations of co-infection were examined, Tr tended to be found in combinations with Co, Cl, and Gi.
      Conclusions: Multiple infections should be considered the most likely result of faecal testing in cats, and case management needs to take this into account. In contrast, the relatively high percentage of cats negative for all 8 enteropathogens tested could indicate an innate resistance to infection. Alternatively it could indicate a lack of exposure to these 8 enteropathogens or the presence of other enteropathogens not assessed by this assay.
    • References:
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999 May 1;214(9):1336-41. (PMID: 10319174)
      J Gen Virol. 2003 Oct;84(Pt 10):2735-2744. (PMID: 13679608)
      Vet Rec. 1993 Dec 4;133(23):576-7. (PMID: 8303809)
      Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1921-6. (PMID: 17901334)
      Vet Parasitol. 2008 Apr 15;152(3-4):242-8. (PMID: 18261855)
      Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2006 Jun;35(2):291-314, viii. (PMID: 16880067)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999 Oct 1;215(7):948-51. (PMID: 10511857)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 May 1;210(9):1307-12. (PMID: 9143535)
      Vet Parasitol. 2010 Oct 11;173(1-2):32-8. (PMID: 20637546)
      Am J Pathol. 2006 Jan;168(1):3-5. (PMID: 16400003)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 May 1;210(9):1313-8. (PMID: 9143536)
      Vet Parasitol. 2009 Dec 3;166(1-2):32-7. (PMID: 19713046)
      Parasite. 2008 Sep;15(3):261-5. (PMID: 18814692)
      J Virol. 1996 Dec;70(12):8977-83. (PMID: 8971027)
      Vet Parasitol. 2003 Jan 2;110(3-4):197-205. (PMID: 12482648)
      Am J Vet Res. 2003 Aug;64(8):1027-9. (PMID: 12926597)
      J Vet Intern Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):959-65. (PMID: 17939549)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2009 Aug;11(8):655-62. (PMID: 19249233)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Jul;10(3):247-51. (PMID: 18243743)
      Am J Vet Res. 2001 Nov;62(11):1690-7. (PMID: 11703009)
      Am J Vet Res. 1979 Oct;40(10):1487-92. (PMID: 230758)
      J Vet Intern Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;15(1):33-8. (PMID: 11215908)
      J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jun;42(6):2707-10. (PMID: 15184456)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Dec;10(6):529-41. (PMID: 18538604)
      Vet Parasitol. 2009 Mar 9;160(1-2):13-7. (PMID: 19070434)
      Vet Rec. 2001 May 26;148(21):649-53. (PMID: 11400984)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012 Aug 1;241(3):331-7. (PMID: 22812469)
      Vet Microbiol. 2012 May 25;157(1-2):78-85. (PMID: 22257775)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2011 Apr;13(4):251-8. (PMID: 21288749)
      J Vet Intern Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):54-60. (PMID: 22182203)
      J Vet Intern Med. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):1195-208. (PMID: 22092607)
      N Z Vet J. 2010 Feb;58(1):6-10. (PMID: 20200569)
      Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Oct;141(10):2111-21. (PMID: 23211606)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2000 Mar 1;216(5):687-92. (PMID: 10707683)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007 Feb 1;230(3):359-63. (PMID: 17269866)
      J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Nov;40(11):4126-30. (PMID: 12409385)
      J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Apr 1;220(7):994-1002. (PMID: 12420776)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2009 Oct;11(10):803-7. (PMID: 19285895)
      Vet Rec. 1992 Feb 15;130(7):133-7. (PMID: 1313617)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2007 Jun;9(3):214-8. (PMID: 17446107)
      Vet Microbiol. 2007 Jan 31;119(2-4):121-31. (PMID: 17046178)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2010 Dec;12(12):889-98. (PMID: 20817588)
      Mol Cell Probes. 2004 Oct;18(5):293-8. (PMID: 15294316)
      J Parasitol. 1957 Aug;43(4):488-90. (PMID: 13463700)
      Microbes Infect. 1999 Aug;1(10):807-16. (PMID: 10816086)
      J Feline Med Surg. 2006 Oct;8(5):292-301. (PMID: 16678461)
      Vet J. 2000 Jan;159(1):8-9. (PMID: 10640407)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20140114 Date Completed: 20140922 Latest Revision: 20220331
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC3896830
    • Accession Number:
      10.1186/1746-6148-10-13
    • Accession Number:
      24410914