Moral judgments about Jewish-Arab intergroup exclusion: the role of cultural identity and contact.

Publisher: American Psychological Association Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 0260564 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1939-0599 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 00121649 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Dev Psychol Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: Washington DC : American Psychological Association
Original Publication: Richmond, Va., American Psychological Assn.

Culture* ; Interpersonal Relations* ; Morals* ; Social Identification*; Arabs/*psychology ; Jews/*psychology ; Judgment/*physiology; Adolescent ; Data Collection ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Prejudice ; Psychological Distance ; Psychological Tests ; Regression Analysis ; United States

Prejudice and discrimination as justifications for social exclusion are often viewed as violations of the moral principles of welfare, justice, and equality, but intergroup exclusion can also often be viewed as a necessary and legitimate means to maintain group identity and cohesion (Rutland, Killen, & Abrams, 2010). The current study was guided by the social reasoning developmental perspective (Killen & Rutland, 2011) to examine the moral judgments of social exclusion encounters, and the degree to which cultural identity and actual contact with members of other cultural groups is related to social evaluations. Surprisingly, no research has examined how intergroup contact bears on moral judgments about Jewish-Arab encounters in the United States. The current study surveyed 241 Jewish and 249 non-Arab/non-Jewish (comparison group) 14- and 17-year-olds to assess their cultural identification, intergroup contact, and moral judgments regarding intergroup peer social exclusion situations between Jewish and Arab youth in peer, home, and community contexts. Participants overwhelmingly rejected exclusion of an outgroup member explicitly because of their group membership. Context effects emerged, and exclusion was rated as most acceptable in the community context and least acceptable in the peer context. Three factors of identity (i.e., exploration, commitment, and concern for relationships) were explored. Generally, higher identity commitment and lower identity concern for relationships were related to more inclusive evaluations. Interactions between the identity factors and intergroup contact and cultural group, however, differentially predicted evaluations of intergroup exclusion.
(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.)

Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):499-514. (PMID: 2270238)
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May;90(5):751-83. (PMID: 16737372)
Early Educ Dev. 2010 Nov 30;21(6):886-911. (PMID: 25741172)
Child Dev. 2001 Mar-Apr;72(2):506-17. (PMID: 11333081)
Am Psychol. 2005 Oct;60(7):697-711. (PMID: 16221003)
Br J Dev Psychol. 2008 Mar;26(1):51-70. (PMID: 25505355)
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):279-91. (PMID: 26162160)
Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):377-90. (PMID: 19466998)
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Dec;35(6):439. (PMID: 23164242)
Dev Psychol. 2003 Jan;39(1):71-84. (PMID: 12518810)
Child Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;82(2):520-32. (PMID: 21410925)
Child Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):224-43. (PMID: 19236403)
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2002;67(4):i-vii, 1-119. (PMID: 12557595)
Child Dev. 2011 May-Jun;82(3):812-29. (PMID: 21410914)

T32 HD007542 United States HD NICHD NIH HHS

Date Created: 20131106 Date Completed: 20140827 Latest Revision: 20211021

20240829

PMC4126678

10.1037/a0034702

24188040