Relationship between burden of infection in ungulate populations and wildlife/livestock interfaces.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Cambridge University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8703737 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1469-4409 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09502688 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Epidemiol Infect Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Original Publication: Cambridge Eng : Cambridge University Press
    • Subject Terms:
    • Abstract:
      In southern African transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs), people, livestock and wildlife share space and resources in semi-arid landscapes. One consequence of the coexistence of wild and domestic herbivores is the risk of pathogen transmission. This risk threatens local livelihoods relying on animal production, public health in the case of zoonoses, national economies in the context of transboundary animal diseases, and the success of integrated conservation and development initiatives. The level of interaction between sympatric wild and domestic hosts, defining different wildlife/livestock interfaces, characterizes opportunities of pathogen transmission between host populations. Exploring the relationship between infection burden and different types of wildlife/domestic interfaces is therefore necessary to manage the sanitary risk in animal populations through control options adapted to these multi-host systems. Here, we assessed the infection burdens of sympatric domestic cattle (Bos taurus/Bos indicus) and African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) at an unfenced interface and compared the infection burdens of cattle populations at different wildlife/livestock interfaces in the Great Limpopo TFCA. Patterns of infection in ungulate populations varied between wild and domestic hosts and between cattle populations at different wildlife/livestock interfaces. Foot-and-mouth disease, Rift Valley fever and theileriosis infections were detected in buffalo and cattle at unfenced interfaces; bovine tuberculosis was only present in buffalo; and brucellosis and lumpy skin disease only in cattle. At unfenced interfaces, cattle populations presented significantly higher Theileria parva and brucellosis prevalence. We hypothesize that cattle populations at wildlife/livestock interfaces face an increased risk of infection compared to those isolated from wildlife, and that the type of interface could influence the diversity and quantity of pathogens shared. Additional host behavioural and molecular epidemiological studies need to be conducted to support this hypothesis. If it is confirmed, the management of wildlife/livestock interfaces will need to be considered through the prism of livestock and public health.
    • References:
      Vet Microbiol. 2000 Mar 15;72(3-4):217-27. (PMID: 10727832)
      Parasitology. 2008 Jun;135(7):795-806. (PMID: 18371236)
      Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Jul 29;356(1411):991-9. (PMID: 11516377)
      Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;36(3):321-32. (PMID: 23219685)
      Rev Sci Tech. 2006 Dec;25(3):897-912. (PMID: 17361759)
      Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2002 Sep;69(3):221-7. (PMID: 12356169)
      Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 May;16(5):884-5. (PMID: 20409396)
      J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1990 Sep;61(3):110-1. (PMID: 2286995)
      S Afr Med J. 2011 Apr;101(4):263-6. (PMID: 21786732)
      Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Oct;969:275-9. (PMID: 12381605)
      Am J Vet Res. 2010 May;71(5):522-6. (PMID: 20433377)
      Prev Vet Med. 2006 Jul 17;75(1-2):63-80. (PMID: 16551482)
      Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Dec;23(3):783-90. (PMID: 15861873)
      Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2005 Jun;72(2):145-51. (PMID: 16137132)
      Infect Genet Evol. 2010 Oct;10(7):976-83. (PMID: 20601171)
      Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Feb;11(2):283-90. (PMID: 15752448)
      PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36527. (PMID: 22570722)
      Epidemiol Infect. 2001 Apr;126(2):317-21. (PMID: 11349983)
      PLoS One. 2010 Aug 17;5(8):e12205. (PMID: 20808913)
      Epidemiol Infect. 2007 May;135(4):529-40. (PMID: 16959052)
      Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Oct;969:236-44. (PMID: 12381598)
      Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2001 Sep;68(3):197-201. (PMID: 11769351)
      Virus Res. 2003 Jan;91(1):145-61. (PMID: 12527441)
      Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90. (PMID: 9595617)
      Prev Vet Med. 2003 Mar 20;57(3):167-72. (PMID: 12581599)
      Rev Sci Tech. 2002 Apr;21(1):53-65. (PMID: 11974630)
      Vet Rec. 1975 Apr 12;96(15):338-41. (PMID: 47752)
      Trop Med Int Health. 1999 Sep;4(9):A12-20. (PMID: 10540307)
      Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1985;8(3-4):259-65. (PMID: 3004803)
      Rev Sci Tech. 2002 Dec;21(3):751-64. (PMID: 12523712)
      J Wildl Dis. 2010 Oct;46(4):1063-9. (PMID: 20966257)
      Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012 Jan;44(1):77-85. (PMID: 21643664)
      Rev Sci Tech. 2002 Aug;21(2):317-34. (PMID: 11974618)
      J Wildl Dis. 2001 Apr;37(2):258-64. (PMID: 11310876)
      Vet Microbiol. 2006 Feb 25;112(2-4):91-100. (PMID: 16343819)
      Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1999 Sep;66(3):185-90. (PMID: 10631708)
      Vet Parasitol. 2008 Aug 1;155(1-2):37-48. (PMID: 18514421)
      Prev Vet Med. 2000 Mar 29;44(1-2):43-60. (PMID: 10727743)
      Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2012 Dec 07;79(1):E1-5. (PMID: 23327325)
      Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983;6(3):209-13. (PMID: 6627909)
      J Hyg (Lond). 1982 Feb;88(1):95-102. (PMID: 7057030)
      Prev Vet Med. 2007 Mar 17;78(3-4):296-316. (PMID: 17123651)
      Epidemiol Infect. 1998 Oct;121(2):441-9. (PMID: 9825798)
      Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2009 Jul;103(5):401-11. (PMID: 19583911)
      Trop Anim Health Prod. 2006 Apr;38(3):195-206. (PMID: 16986767)
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20130228 Date Completed: 20130805 Latest Revision: 20220716
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC9151594
    • Accession Number:
      10.1017/S0950268813000204
    • Accession Number:
      23442901