National newspaper portrayal of U.S. nursing homes: periodic treatment of topic and tone.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
Read Online Read More Add to Saved list
  • Additional Information
    • Source:
      Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8607003 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1468-0009 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 0887378X NLM ISO Abbreviation: Milbank Q Subsets: MEDLINE
    • Publication Information:
      Publication: Malden, MA : New York, NY : Blackwell Publishers ; Milbank Memorial Fund
      Original Publication: New York, NY : Published for the Milbank Memorial Fund by Cambridge University Press, c1986-
    • Subject Terms:
      Nursing Homes* ; Public Opinion*; Information Dissemination/*methods ; Mass Media/*statistics & numerical data ; Newspapers as Topic/*statistics & numerical data ; Periodicals as Topic/*statistics & numerical data; Bibliometrics ; Humans ; Journalism/statistics & numerical data ; Marketing of Health Services ; United States
    • Abstract:
      Context: Although observers have long highlighted the relationship of public distrust, government regulation, and media depictions of nursing-home scandals, no study has systematically analyzed the way in which nursing homes have been portrayed in the national media. This study examines how nursing homes were depicted in four leading national newspapers-the New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, and Los Angeles Times-from 1999 to 2008.
      Methods: We used keyword searches of the LexisNexis database to identify 1,704 articles pertaining to nursing homes. We then analyzed the content of each article and assessed its tone, themes, prominence, and central actor. We used basic frequencies and descriptive statistics to examine the articles' content, both cross-sectionally and over time.
      Findings: Approximately one-third of the articles were published in 1999/2000, and a comparatively high percentage (12.4%) appeared in 2005. Most were news stories (89.8%), and about one-quarter were on the front page of the newspaper or section. Most focused on government (42.3%) or industry (39.2%) interests, with very few on residents/family (13.3%) and community (5.3%) concerns. Most were negative (45.1%) or neutral (37.0%) in tone, and very few were positive (9.6%) or mixed (8.3%). Common themes were quality (57.0%), financing (33.4%), and negligence/fraud (28.1%). Both tone and themes varied across newspapers and years.
      Conclusions: Overall, our findings highlight the longitudinal variation in the four widely read newspapers' framing of nursing-home coverage, regarding not only tone but also shifts in media attention from one aspect of this complex policy area to another. The predominantly negative media reports contribute to the poor public opinion of nursing homes and, in turn, of the people who live and work in them. These reports also place nursing homes at a competitive disadvantage and may pose challenges to health delivery reform, including care integration across settings.
      (© 2012 Milbank Memorial Fund.)
    • References:
      Gerontologist. 2001 Feb;41(1):24-33. (PMID: 11220811)
      Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 1):1317-36. (PMID: 16899009)
      J Gerontol Soc Work. 2010 Apr;53(3):270-82. (PMID: 20336573)
      Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(4):725-46. (PMID: 22053531)
      Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Aug;67(4 Suppl):126S-40S. (PMID: 20643824)
      J Elder Abuse Negl. 2008;20(3):265-75. (PMID: 18928054)
      Soc Sci Med. 2007 Aug;65(3):405-17. (PMID: 17482736)
      Gerontologist. 2008 Apr;48(2):142-8. (PMID: 18483426)
      N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 31;364(13):1243-50. (PMID: 21449787)
      Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1713-31. (PMID: 15533183)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):219-29. (PMID: 12674425)
      Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):137-44. (PMID: 11387534)
      Gerontologist. 2010 Apr;50(2):238-52. (PMID: 19597057)
      J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Mar;8(3):142-9. (PMID: 17349942)
      Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(5):655-75. (PMID: 17899530)
      Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2160-7. (PMID: 19833981)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jul;30(7):1358-65. (PMID: 21734211)
      J Aging Soc Policy. 2012;24(2):118-35. (PMID: 22497354)
      J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Apr;33(2):249-79. (PMID: 18325900)
      Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2296-315. (PMID: 22578039)
      Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Aug;67(4 Suppl):141S-50S. (PMID: 20643825)
      Am J Public Health. 2008 Apr;98(4):604-10. (PMID: 18309133)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):35-43. (PMID: 20048358)
      Gerontologist. 2010 Aug;50(4):426-42. (PMID: 20631035)
      Health Care Women Int. 2002 Sep-Nov;23(6-7):729-41. (PMID: 12418992)
      Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1718-27. (PMID: 21900663)
      EBRI Issue Brief. 2010 Mar;(340):1-43. (PMID: 20369455)
      Gerontologist. 2011 Apr;51(2):145-55. (PMID: 21208997)
      Health Educ Q. 1996 Aug;23(3):293-317. (PMID: 8841816)
    • Grant Information:
      P01 AG027296 United States AG NIA NIH HHS
    • Publication Date:
      Date Created: 20121211 Date Completed: 20130212 Latest Revision: 20211021
    • Publication Date:
      20231215
    • Accession Number:
      PMC3530740
    • Accession Number:
      10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00681.x
    • Accession Number:
      23216429